Want An EV That Actually Holds Its Value? iSeeCars Says To Start With These






Imagine paying $50,000 for a brand new electric vehicle — you’re excited to lower your carbon footprint and ready to brag about not paying $4 or more for a gallon of gas. Your enthusiasm may dim a bit, however, when you watch almost half of the car’s value disappear within the first few years.

Surely we’re exaggerating, right? It depends on the car. Electric vehicles, or EVs, tend to depreciate faster than gasoline-powered vehicles because the technology is advancing so quickly and many buyers received heavy incentives when they purchased their new car. Those incentives don’t translate to the used market. Consumers also worry about battery life, and lesser-known brands and models are harder to sell than popular models like Tesla.

On average, an EV loses up 30% of its value in the first year, and up to 60% of its value after three years. Compared to a standard gasoline-powered vehicle, which typically loses about 16% of its value after one year and about 40% after three years, these numbers are a bit staggering. There’s a lot to consider when you buy a new car, but resale value should definitely be on the list. Whether you hold onto a car for five years or ten, you will eventually sell or trade it. Getting top dollar for it is what matters most. For now, no EV will hold up as well as a traditional car, but here are three electric vehicles that hold their value better than competitors, at least according to iSeeCars.

Tesla Model 3

To the surprise of absolutely no one, iSeeCars reports that the Tesla Model 3 depreciates more slowly than any other EV on the market, as of March 2026. Tesla continues to do well in terms of sales, and after five years of ownership, Model 3 owners can expect their car to be worth about 45.4% of its original value. With a base price of $36,990, a 2026 Model Y should be worth about $16,800 after those five years.

The Model 3 was the second bestselling electric vehicle in 2025, behind only Tesla’s own Model Y. It’s the most affordable model that Tesla sells, and it has an estimated driving range of 321 miles on a full charge. When it’s time to charge, drivers can add up to 170 miles in only 15 minutes of charging. Inside, the cabin is clean and uncluttered — there’s a 15.4-inch touchscreen that drivers use to control everything from climate controls to seat position. Buyers can add self-driving capabilities for an extra $99 per month. The Model 3 has a basic four-year/50,000-mile warranty, and the battery and drive unit are covered by an eight-year/100,000-mile warranty.

Porsche Taycan

If budget is not a concern, you may not be too worried about how quickly your car depreciates. That being said, the electric Porsche Taycan takes second place on iSeeCars’ list of EVs that depreciate more slowly. The Taycan, which starts at $105,800, will lose about 54.7% of its value in the first five years, or about $57,800. That’s a hefty chunk of change, especially for a vehicle that only has an estimated driving range of 274 miles. To get close to the Model 3’s driving range, buyers have to invest in the Taycan Black Edition, which has a starting price of $122,800 and a range of 318 miles.

You should consider the Taycan if you’re looking for a performance vehicle. It can go from zero to 60 mph in 4.5 seconds using launch control, and it has a top speed of 143 mph. With a DC fast charger, it can charge from 10% to 80% in only 18 minutes. The base model has rear-wheel drive, while other models offer all-wheel drive. All Turbo models now include electric sport sound, which changes how the car sounds based on your speed and acceleration.

Inside, the cabin is designed for a driver-oriented experience. Standard safety features include emergency braking, parking sensors and lane-change assistance with blind-spot monitoring. All models also boast a regenerative braking system. Some features that are more commonly standard on other luxury vehicles are optional on the Taycan, including adaptive cruise control.

Hyundai Kona (electric model)

The Hyundai Kona Electric, which the automaker launched in 2019, is a well-rated and affordable compact SUV. iSeeCars ranked the electric Kona as the third best buy when it comes to EV depreciation, with an expected loss of 56.5% in the first five years. It’s the most affordable option included on this list, but don’t expect to find any 2026 models at your local dealership. Hyundai paused production on the electric Kona and is skipping the 2026 model year, but don’t fear, the automaker reassured customers it will return in 2027.

EV sales took a hit after the federal government ended its tax rebate program, and Hyundai stated that it has enough stock of the 2025 Kona Electric to meet buyer demand. At time of writing, the electric Kona is not listed on Hyundai’s website, so you’ll have to check in with your local dealership for availability. The 2025 model had an MSRP of $32,975, meaning it has an estimated value of about $14,300 after five years.

The base model has an estimated driving range of 200 miles, which is paltry compared to the Tesla Model 3, which sells for only a few thousand more. Using a DC fast charger, the Kona Electric charges from 10% to 80% in 43 minutes. Inside, drivers will find a standard 12.3-inch touchscreen and wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. Standard safety features include adaptive cruise control, Highway Driving Assist and speed limit recognition.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






There are certain engine configurations that are known even to those whose interest in engines is minimal. For instance, most people will know what makes a V-engine a V-engine, and even the differences between an in-line and flat engine

One engine design trait that’s perhaps less well-known is also related to the engine block, but not to with how the cylinders are arranged in the engine, rather with how they’re supported and cooled. When looking at this aspect of engine design, there are really three main types of engine block to look at. At the extremes are closed-deck and open-deck engine blocks, with some modern engines taking a halfway house approach with a semi-closed design. 

Let’s start by defining what an engine deck is. Essentially, the engine deck is that part of the block that the head gasket sits on, and the engine head attaches to. This means that an inline engine with a single line of cylinders will have one deck, whereas a V-configuration with two banks of cylinders will have two decks. 

Now that we understand that, we can begin to discuss the differences between closed-deck and open-deck engine blocks. In an open-deck engine, there is open space around the top of the cylinders that allows the coolant to circulate more freely. In a closed-deck design, in case you haven’t guessed it by now, the deck features extra material that offers less in the way of cooling, but it does support the cylinders more rigidly. Let’s pop the cylinder head off and have a closer look at these engine block types and why they matter more than you may think. 

Open-deck engines are cool, but flawed

For engine makers, there are definite advantages to open-deck designs — they cost less to manufacture when compared to closed-deck engines, and keep the engine cooler by exposing more of the surface area of the cylinder to the cooling liquid. 

However, all this open space around the cylinders is all very well and good when looking at cooling and manufacturing complexity — but cracks start to appear (sometimes literally) when we look at other aspects of closed-deck engine blocks. While it’s unfair to call open-deck engines unreliable and leave it at that, there are trade-offs in the design, and these become more noticeable in high-performance situations.

Essentially, the lack of material at the top of the engine deck means the engine is less structurally rigid right at the point where it meets some of the most extreme forces engines have to cope with — the combustion point at the top of the cylinder.

If you removed the head from an open-deck design and look down at the deck, this structural weakness is visible. From this viewpoint, the cylinders look separate from the rest of the engine block, with the gap between the two being used for coolant, as some open-deck designs have limited support at either end of the cylinder bank. While this gives more space for coolant to move freely, the downside is that it also does the same for the cylinder. Over time, even the limited movements of cylinders can weaken the head gasket and bring all the associated troubles that follow such a failure. 

Why some engines use closed- and semi-closed deck designs

Open-deck engine blocks are optimized for cooling and manufacturing efficiency. However, incorporate such a configuration in a high-revving, turbocharged brute of an engine and, well, it could end very badly. This is why such engines will usually use a closed-deck configuration. 

In a closed-deck engine, the open spaces around the cylinders of an open deck are filled with additional material. Obviously, the removal of such space and the flexibility it gives to the cylinders substantially strengthens the engine block. This is why some people fill engine blocks with concrete — it removes the flexibility afforded by the presence of cooling chambers. This is especially important for high-performance engines, but to call it overkill for the family runabout is not overstating the case. 

However, and the more observant among you will be there by now, filling an engine’s cooling cavities with material may add strength — but at the expense of cooling efficiency. This is why many modern turbocharged engines or higher-performance engines use a halfway house design in the form of semi-closed decks. 

Semi-closed decks are a compromise design that offers more rigidity to the cylinders by adding more support points. These supports are usually at the top of the cylinder. For instance, while there are pros and cons to Subaru’s EJ20 engine, the company released a version with a semi-closed deck with four additional support points, which should make it less prone to bore distortion. Ultimately, open-deck and closed-deck engine blocks represent design decisions based on the demands the engine is expected to handle. 





Source link