What Company Developed The A-10 Warthog, And How Many Are Still Flying?







One type of aircraft used by the U.S. in its 2026 war with Iran is the A-10 Thunderbolt II, which is impressive given that the plane first deployed in March 1976, half a century earlier. Affectionately nicknamed the Warthog, the roots of the A-10 actually go further back another decade, when the U.S. Air Force considered building a dedicated Close Air Support (CAS) plane to support the war in Vietnam, particularly one that was all-weather-capable and which had enough firepower to take out Soviet tanks.

Four years later, the U.S.A.F. put a call out for proposals for the new A-X (Attack Experimental) plane, and six defense contractors responded. In early 1973, Fairchild’s prototype won the contract. The company, which Sherman Mills Fairchild founded in 1920 to make and sell aerial photographic equipment, had previously produced the C-119 Flying Boxcar, a cargo and troop transport plane that played a big role in the Korean War. To win the contract, Fairchild’s CAS prototype faced off against another from Northrop and even needed to prove its worth in a fly-off with the A-7D Corsair II before full production could begin.

That production ran for eight years, with the last Warthog being constructed in 1984. All told, 713 units were built. Not adjusting for inflation, the original cost of each A-10 is estimated to be around $18 million, which is closer to $70 million in 2026 dollars. On top of that, millions more have been spent upgrading each of the surviving planes with newer wings, weapons, and defensive capabilities, which is a big reason why between 260 and 280 planes are still flying over 40 years later.

A different company built the A-10’s cannon

A design aspect that was very important to the Air Force during the A-10’s development was that it needed to effectively carry a very big gun. After all, the aircraft was specifically designed for CAS, and serious firepower was needed to take on Soviet tanks on the ground. The Department of Defense issued a separate request for proposal (RFP) for a 30-mm rotary cannon in 1970, which meant that different companies could (and would) be selected to build the cannon and the plane that would carry it.

General Electric ended up winning the contract and building the GAU-8/A Avenger Gatling gun. That means the monster gun, which can fire a whopping 65 rounds per second, had the same GE branding as many Americans’ microwaves. The Air Force specifically required that the Avenger be versatile enough to attack light, medium, and heavy tanks, as well as armored personnel carriers, bunkers, and fixed or mobile artillery.

As part of the contract, four types of ammunition were also developed for the 7-barrel Avenger: armor-piercing incendiary, high-explosive incendiary, semi-armor-piercing high explosive, and target practice rounds. On average, the cannon could carry 1,150 rounds in its drum. In the 1990s, GE divested its aerospace armaments division, and General Dynamics — which has no relation to the similarly-named General Electric — is now the manufacturer of the GAU-8/A Avenger.

How long will the A-10 Warthog remain in service?

Reports vary about how many Warthogs are still in service today, but the range is somewhere between 260 and 280. That’s not bad for an aircraft that’s been in service for 50 years. The A-10 played a crucial role in the first Gulf War, flying 8,100 sorties and launching 90% of the AGM-65 Maverick missiles fired during the conflict. When Operation Desert Storm concluded, the Warthog boasted a mission-capable rate of nearly 96%. A few years later, it was heavily used during NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia at the height of the Kosovo War.

Since then, the U.S. Air Force has repeatedly requested to phase out the aging plane, but Congress has not deemed it cost-effective, given how useful the Warthog continues to be. As the military modernizes for 21st-century combat, it seemed the retirement of the A-10 was still inevitable, at least until the U.S. started a war with Iran. The Warthog suddenly found itself back in action, being used to target small, fast-moving boats and other coastal threats in the Middle East.

The aircraft briefly made headlines when one was shot down near the Strait of Hormuz — fortunately, the pilot was quickly rescued. There won’t be a replacement for the downed plane, though, as no new Warthogs will ever be made. As for what aircraft could succeed the A-10 Warthog, there may not be a definitive answer, especially as there’s nothing in the works and the military has focused its resources more on multirole aircraft, such as the F-35 Lightning II and F-15EX Eagle II. These planes, as well as a fleet of uncrewed combat aerial vehicles (UCAVs), may collectively fill the hole the A-10 leaves when the final Warthog is eventually retired.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link