Which Truck Offers More At Its Price Point?







Pickup trucks are getting expensive as the vehicle segment grows in popularity in the U.S. market. The Ford F-150 is one of the best-selling truck models in America, but it isn’t the only option out there. The Ram 1500 and Toyota Tundra are also pickup trucks available at around the same price, starting at an MSRP of $44,820 and $43,455 respectively. 

Let’s start with what’s under the hood. The Ram 1500 has three engine options in 2026: a mild hybrid V6, a back-after-popular-demand Hemi V8, or the twin-turbo Hurricane inline-six. With the newly-returned Hemi, you get 395 horsepower and can reach 60 miles per hour in 6 seconds. The turbocharged Hurricane — recommended in our review of the 1500 — makes 420 or 540 horsepower (if you go for the Limited 4×4 Crew Cab), which gets you to 60 mph in either 4.9 seconds or 4.2 seconds. The Ram 1500 also comes with both rear and four-wheel drive. 

Meanwhile, the Tundra has a 3.4-liter twin-turbo i-Force V6. The base model’s version has 348 hp and a 60 mph sprint of 6.5 seconds. Every other trim has 389 hp and can reach 60 mph in 6.1 seconds. The most powerful setup is the i-Force Max, a hybrid option that adds an electric motor and battery for a combined 437 hp. This can get you to that 60 mph in as little as 5.7 seconds. This makes the Ram 1500 the more powerful option of the two, but owning a pickup is about more than raw horsepower.

Ram 1500 vs. Toyota Tundra: Towing and payload capacity

This may be the most important comparison between the two pickup trucks — at least if you’re planning to put yours to work. The Ram 1500 has a maximum towing capacity of 11,610 pounds when equipped with the Hurricane I6, while the rear-wheel drive Tundra SR 5 raises that a bit with 12,000 pounds. While this is not much compared to other pickup trucks out there — the Ford F-150 can get up to 13,500 pounds with the right configuration — it’s enough to bring a small camper on a weekend trip or get your boat to and from the water. 

The Ram 1500’s total payload depends on its trim and cab configurations. At the top of the list, the 1500 Tradesman Quad Cab has a max payload of 2,370 pounds. This is far more than the top-rated Tundra SR 5, which has a maximum payload of just 1,940 pounds. This limitation could make the Ram 1500 a better choice if you need your pickup to put in some heavy hauling in the truck bed. However, the Tundra — which comes in a choice of 65.6, 77.6, and 96.5-inch bed lengths — offers a wider variety of options, whereas the Ram 1500 only comes in 67.4 and 76.3-inch sizes.

Ram 1500 vs. Toyota Tundra: Fuel efficiency and interior design

Now let’s go over the drive itself. A 2025 two-wheel drive Ram 1500 with the base 3.6-liter V6 has an EPA-rated fuel economy of 20 miles per gallon in the city and 25 mpg on the highway, for a combined 22 mpg. The 2025 Toyota Tundra’s fuel economy — for the 3.4-liter V6 rear wheel drive model — is 18 mpg in the city and 23 mpg on the highway, for a combined 20 mpg. 

The Ram 1500 has been praised for its spacious and comfortable interior that feels a bit luxurious for the price. Most trims even have heated and ventilated seats and a panoramic sunroof, making longer road trips a lot more enjoyable. The storage is especially noteworthy, with plenty of room in the cabin for more camping gear. In comparison the Tundra can feel a bit cheaper, but there’s plenty of legroom and storage. It’s more focused on function than fashion, offering extra storage options like a storage bin in the center console and an under-seat box. 

While it’s not flashy, the Tundra will likely last longer than the 1500, giving it the edge in the longevity department. However, the Ram 1500 delivers a bit more on engine power, speed, payload capacity, fuel efficiency, and interior comfort. In the end, it depends what you need in a pickup — the 1500 offers more workhorse capability but the Tundra is a trusty pickup for urban living. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A day before SpaceX’s initial public offering, which set stock market records, a giant inflatable figure of the company’s CEO, Elon Musk, appeared in Times Square in New York.

An unflattering caricature of a bare-chested Musk, with the words “SpaceX’s Grok makes AI child porn” on its chest and back, the inflatable was the centerpiece of a demonstration organized by the advocacy group Safe AI Now. The goal: tie the landmark financial offering to deepfake sexualized images of children generated by SpaceX’s AI platform, Grok.

The protest took place just outside Nasdaq’s global headquarters on West 42nd Street on Thursday.

A representative for SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

A spokesperson for SAIN said in an email that because SpaceX owns Grok, it makes child porn. “A company that enables child porn is inherently unstable and puts American investors and retirement funds at risk. SpaceX shareholders are on the hook for every Grok lawsuit, criminal investigation, and regulatory fine that is coming,” the spokesperson said.

The organization describes itself on its website as “a coalition of faith leaders, family advocates, child development experts, online safety organizations, legal professionals, technologists, and concerned citizens working to ensure that artificial intelligence advances human flourishing.” SAIN is effectively anonymous; it does not identity any of its leadership or any individuals associated with the group on the website.

The effigy, the spokesperson said, was chosen as a metaphor for Musk and the companies he owns or is associated with, including the social media platform X and the satellite broadband provider Starlink, which have been absorbed into SpaceX along with Grok and xAI. (Musk’s automaker, Tesla, is separate.)

“Much like Musk and his companies, it is inflated, full of hot air, and could pop at any minute — it served as a warning to investors eager to buy into Musk’s SpaceX IPO today,” the spokesperson said.

Grok’s history of deepfakes

CNET AI Atlas badge; click to see more

Ever since Musk introduced Grok in late 2023 and made it available to premium subscribers on X (formerly Twitter), the AI platform has had fewer guardrails than rivals such as ChatGPT and Claude.

It has a history of promoting antisemitism and hate speech while also allowing users, with its image-generation features, to do things such as undress photos of celebrities with AI-generated images or to create sexualized images of children. Those types of images have led to criminal investigations and lawsuits, and xAI made changes it said were meant to address Grok’s problems. 

But as Wired reported on Thursday, Grok continues to host sexualized deepfake images and videos of well-known women. 





Source link