Why Automakers Abandoned These Popular Windshields During The 1960s






The year was 1951. New York Yankees star Joe DiMaggio announced his retirement from baseball. Universal Automatic Computer (UNIVAC), the first commercial digital computer, entered service at the U.S. Census Bureau. And Harley Earl, the legendary head of automobile design at General Motors, created the concept for the 1951 GM Le Sabre, the vehicle credited with introducing the wraparound windshield. Earl was very familiar with concept car design, as he was the man who created the ahead-of-its-time Buick Y-Job concept in 1938.

Earl’s goal with the wraparound windshield was to reduce the driver’s blind spots while giving passengers a more panoramic view. He drew inspiration from the bulbous canopies of new-age jet fighters and was only able to implement the idea once technology made it possible. Still, in those early days, bending glass was a laborious and costly effort. It first had to be heated to a perfect state between a solid and a liquid, then carefully draped over a steel form, where gravity naturally curved the glass. The effort was worth it, though: it turned out well enough for GM to start offering it on its 1953 models, and several other automakers soon followed suit.

However, by the early 1960s, the wraparound fad had fizzled out, mainly due to problems with the “dog-leg” pillars used to fashion the wraparound effect. Not only did the slanted pillars make it more difficult for people to get in and out of the car, but the curved portions actually distorted the driver’s view. What’s more, the wide expanse of glass created unbearable heat inside the cabin, while the thinner pillars proved structurally unsafe and offered little protection in an accident.

Panoramic windshields were a fad

Harley Earl had become so renowned by the 1950s that, when he did something, the rest of the industry sat up and took notice. Earl is credited with everything from establishing industry standards still used today to creating the Corvette and putting tailfins on Cadillacs. Such was the case with his wraparound windshield, which fit in perfectly with the trend of automakers mimicking jet plane features and slapping them onto their vehicles.

Chrysler, however, went a different way, opting for a design that echoed that of the 1948-1954 Hudson. The automaker’s windshield retained the slant and panoramic view, but didn’t have the same safety issues as GM’s “dog-leg” pillars. The result, according to an issue of “Motor Life” magazine from 1954 (via Indie Auto), was a windshield that didn’t really look much like a traditional wraparound one from the outside, but still offered great visibility with much less distortion. The design was a hit with safety-minded folks, though, even if it still had some optical distortion.

Excessive heat remained a key issue with massive windshields of any sort, mainly because air conditioning hadn’t yet become widely adopted. While it had become a common option by the mid-1950s, uptake was slow: even in 1965, fewer than one-quarter of all new automobiles had the costly feature. On top of that, vehicle safety was becoming a growing concern by the late ’50s, and the thin, slanted “dog-leg” A-pillar wasn’t as strong as old-school versions. Ultimately, the wraparound panoramic windshield proved too problematic (and costly), forcing the industry to ditch the whole concept.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

A toolkit can go a long way toward helping you stock up on essentials. All of the major tool brands offer different kinds, including the longstanding power and hand tool favorite, Craftsman. Its products can be found in many online stores, and Amazon is currently holding a major sale. At the time of publication, a 262-piece Craftsman hand tool set is on a massive markdown of 40% off, saving you $100 at checkout.

The collection currently costs $149, which is still a lot of money, but is a big budgetary improvement over the $249 regular price. With the discount, you’re getting more for your dollar, and this kit includes 118 sockets, three ratchets to use them on, 24 wrenches, 44 hex keys, 66 specialty bits, and seven extra accessories. The set comes in a three-drawer, handled toolbox that’s part of the Craftsman VersaStack modular storage system. You’re also getting a full lifetime warranty.

While the price and quantity of tools may seem right, what is there to say about the quality of this Craftsman kit? According to most customers, it’s a worthwhile buy for any DIYer, even without a huge sale to sweeten the deal.

How online buyers feel about this Craftsman tool kit

On Amazon, the response to this specific Craftsman tool kit has been resoundingly positive. There are currently close to 300 reviews discussing this specific variant and over 10,000 for the overall product, and the vast majority gave it five stars. Most found the quality of the tools and sockets more than up to par, the VersaStack toolbox sturdy and great for organization and protection, and the price adequate. Still, it’s often said this is more of a beginner or around-the-house kind of kit, so if you want it for professional use, it’s not considered the strongest option on the market.

Elsewhere online, this kit has continued to garner largely positive press. On the Craftsman website itself, almost all of the 18 reviews gave it five stars. Some applauded the functionality of the VersaStack case and its ability to connect to other boxes in the line, while others praised the versatility of the tools within. Meanwhile, most of the 289 reviews on Lowe’s website are five-star and approve of the kit’s piece selection and durability.

There are a lot of great mechanic tool sets for anyone’s budget, and there could be a case to make that this Craftsman 262-piece set belongs alongside them. At its sale price or otherwise, it’s a hit across several retailers. Whether it’s the right set for you and your hand tool-related needs, though, is a question only you can answer. 





Source link