Why Netgear just got the first FCC router ban exemption in the US


Detail of Orbi home WiFi mesh network system, on pink background.

MacFormat / Contributor / Getty Images

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Netgear has gotten FCC approval to sell new routers in the US.
  • The FCC ban restricts foreign-made routers from import or sale in the US.
  • Existing Netgear routers will also continue to get updates.

Buying a new router in the US has become a tricky situation thanks to a new government ban on foreign-made routers. Now, one major manufacturer has been cleared for sales in the US, at least for the time being.

Exempted until 2027

Netgear is the first router company to score an exemption from the FCC ban, which was announced late last month. With this exemption in effect, the company now has conditional approval to sell its routers in the US, at least until Oct.1, 2027. The approval covers new consumer router models, including Netgear Nighthawk and Orbi products.

Also: Your router may be vulnerable to Russian hackers, FBI warns: 5 steps to take now

“We’re pleased to share that Netgear is the first retail consumer router company to receive conditional approval from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as a trusted consumer router company,” Netgear said in a letter sent to customers. “We hope this recognition gives you added peace of mind — knowing that the network powering your home meets rigorous standards.”

Ban restrictions

The ban itself restricts new foreign-made routers from being imported or sold in the US unless they receive approval. Existing models already being sold in stores or that are in your home are unaffected. That’s because such routers have already received prior FCC approval.

The FCC made this move following a review by a White House-convened interagency body, which determined that routers produced in foreign countries pose “unacceptable risks to the national security of the United States and to the safety and security of US persons.” Noting that most routers sold in the US are made in other countries, this “body” expressed concerns over such routers being compromised.

Also: A $30 router with a built-in VPN? I had to try it – and haven’t had any regrets

Beyond restricting the sale of new routers, the ban also calls into question the ability of existing routers to receive software and firmware updates. An FCC waiver allows all current routers to continue to get these updates, but only until March 1, 2027. The agency has so far been unclear as to what could happen after that date. In its own FAQ, Netgear said that with its approval status, the company is not subject to this deadline for software updates.

In addition to affecting routers, the overall ban covers telecom equipment and services in general. The ban is also clearly aimed more at certain countries. Among the FCC’s covered list of prohibited items are those from companies such as Huawei, ZTE, China Telecom, and China Mobile.

All of those firms have their roots in China, which has long been in the crosshairs of the US government over fears that their products spy on US citizens on behalf of Beijing. The FCC has also banned future router models from Asus and TP-Link, both of which operate in China as well.

US allies

Netgear manufactures its consumer routers in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand, nations that are considered allies by the US. In its FAQ, Netgear made sure to point out that “we no longer procure internet-connected components from manufacturers in China, or entities owned or controlled by China (or any other country deemed to be a foreign adversary).”

Also: Traditional Wi-Fi router vs. mesh: How to decide between the 2 popular networking options

Certain routers have also come under fire for being vulnerable to hackers, who can infect them with malware or trick them into joining a botnet. Typically, these are older models that have reached end of life and are no longer supported or receive firmware updates.

Though Netgear has received clearance to sell new routers in the US, the status of other manufacturers is still a question mark. That may give Netgear a virtual monopoly in the US, at least until other companies are exempted from the ban.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link