YouTube Premium’s price goes up to $15.99 in June – but you can save $32 with one change


I was overpaying for YouTube Premium for months without realizing it - check yours ASAP

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • YouTube is raising prices by $2 to $4 a month.
  • The increase applies to all monthly subscriptions and the annual plan.
  • This is just the latest move among streaming services to boost prices.

Do you subscribe to YouTube Premium? If so, you’ll soon be paying premium prices to watch your favorite videos.

Both new and existing subscribers are getting socked by higher price tags due to go into effect with the June billing cycle. The sign-up page for YouTube Premium reveals the gory details. But here are the increases for each plan:

  • Lite plan: $8.99 per month, up from $7.99.
  • Student plan: $8.99 per month, up from $7.99.
  • Individual plan: $15.99 per month, up from $13.99.
  • Family plan: $26.99 per month, up from $22.99.

Also: I was overpaying for YouTube Premium for months without realizing it – check yours ASAP

One way to save money on an individual plan is to opt for an annual subscription instead of a monthly one. But even here, YouTube is boosting the price to $159.99, up from $139.99. If you subscribe through Apple, the news is even worse. With Apple taking its usual 30% cut of the action, you’ll shell out 30% more than if you sign up for YouTube Premium at the website.

YouTube has been alerting current subscribers about the price increases via email. One person who has the individual plan through Apple shared the email on Reddit, which read in part: “To continue delivering great service and features, we’re increasing your price to $20.99/month. We don’t make these decisions lightly, but this update will allow us to continue to improve Premium and support the creators and artists you watch on YouTube.”

Save by signing up directly on YouTube

The email also told this person that they would save on their Premium subscription by signing up directly on the website, where the new rate would be $15.99/month.

Compared with free YouTube, a Premium plan offers several perks. You can watch videos ad-free, download and play them offline, and run videos in the background while doing something else. With all plans except Lite, you can listen to music ad-free in the YouTube Music app and enjoy other benefits.

Also: Why YouTube with ads just isn’t worth it for me anymore – even if it’s free

The last time YouTube bumped up the cost of its Premium subscriptions was in 2023. At that point, the price of an individual plan rose to $13.99 a month from $11.99, while the cost of an annual plan increased to $139.99 from $119.99.

Over the past year, price increases have run rampant among video streamers. Last month, Netflix raised the cost of its standard plan with ads by $1 per month and the cost of its ad-free standard and premium plans by $2. Last October, the price tag for Hulu with Live TV jumped to $90 a month, up from $82. In September, Disney+ raised subscription prices across the board by $2 to $3 per month.

Time to review your subscriptions

The irony here is that streaming video services were initially touted as a cheaper alternative to a full cable TV subscription. While that’s still true individually, many of us pay for multiple streaming services, which means our monthly bills may be even more exorbitant.

With YouTube and other services all boosting their prices, now is as good a time as any to review all your streaming subscriptions and see which ones you can downgrade or cancel outright. Also consider free or inexpensive streaming services, such as Roku TV or Tubi TV, both of which offer a variety of movies and TV series to enjoy.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


A new class-action lawsuit, filed on Monday by three teenage girls and their guardians, alleges that Elon Musk’s xAI created and distributed child sexual abuse material featuring their faces and likenesses with its Grok AI tech.

“Their lives have been shattered by the devastating loss of privacy, dignity, and personal safety that the production and dissemination of this CSAM have caused,” the filing says. “xAI’s financial gain through the increased use of its image- and video-making product came at their expense and well-being.”

From December to early January, Grok allowed many AI and X social media users to create AI-generated nonconsensual intimate images, sometimes known as deepfake porn. Reports estimate that Grok users made 4.4 million “undressed” or “nudified” images, 41% of the total number of images created, over a period of nine days. 

X, xAI and its safety and child safety divisions did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The wave of “undressed” images stirred outrage around the world. The European Commission quickly launched an investigation, while Malaysia and Indonesia banned X within their borders. Some US government representatives called on Apple and Google to remove the app from their app stores for violating their policies, but no federal investigation into X or xAI has been opened. A similar, separate class-action lawsuit was filed (PDF) by a South Carolina woman in late January.

The dehumanizing trend highlighted just how capable modern AI image tools are at creating content that seems realistic. The new complaint compares Grok’s self-proclaimed “spicy AI” generation to the “dark arts” with its ease of subjecting children to “any pose, however sick, however fetishized, however unlawful.”

“To the viewer, the resulting video appears entirely real. For the child, her identifying features will now forever be attached to a video depicting her own child sexual abuse,” the complaint reads.

AI Atlas

The complaint says xAI is at fault because it did not employ industry-standard guardrails that would prevent abusers from making this content. It says xAI licensed use of its tech to third-party companies abroad, which sold subscriptions that led abusers to make child sexual abuse images featuring the faces and likenesses of the victims. The requests ran through xAI’s servers, which makes the company liable, the complaint argues.

The lawsuit was filed by three Jane Does, pseudonyms given to the teens to protect their identities. Jane Doe 1 was first alerted to the fact that abusive, AI-generated sexual material of her was circulating on the web by an anonymous Instagram message in early December. The filing says she was told about a Discord server by the anonymous Instagram user, where the material was shared. That led Jane Doe 1 and her family, and eventually law enforcement, to find and arrest one perpetrator.

Ongoing investigations led the families of Jane Does 2 and 3 to learn their children’s images had been transformed with xAI tech into abusive material.





Source link