15 Of The Greatest Cars To Come Out Of Automotive’s Golden Age






Various factors drove the golden age of cars during the ’60s — the U.S. economy boomed after the Second World War, giving many Americans the ability to purchase vehicles. This increase in automotive sales allowed car companies to invest in design and technologies, allowing them to build models that caught the attention of the buying public. The 1956 National Interstate and Defense Highways Act also saw the establishment of the national interstate highway system, making it easier and more comfortable to drive across the nation.

The same thing happened in Western Europe when it came to cars. Even though the region was just coming out of the shambles of war by the mid-1940s, it was on the way to recovery by the 1950s, with car ownership rising again by 1959. The combinations of all these factors helped drive car adoption on both sides of the Atlantic, which is why many consider this period to be the golden age of cars.

We’re listing some of the greatest vehicles to come out of these years. Many of these models launched during the ’60s, but we’re also including a couple of vehicles before and after this decade that still have an impact on motoring today.

1938 Volkswagen Beetle

If we’re talking about one of the most iconic vehicles of all time, we certainly cannot forget about the Volkswagen Beetle. It had a somewhat dark beginning, having been born from Nazi Germany’s push to appear prosperous and build a “people’s car” (Volkswagen in German) that would be easily affordable for the average citizen. The Second World War disrupted the Volkswagen’s production, but it was soon restarted after the end of the war to provide transportation for the occupying forces.

It was first brought Stateside in 1949 but failed to garner interest because of the anti-German sentiment of the 1940s. Nevertheless, it slowly gained traction in 1950 when a vehicle importer expedited dealers’ orders for sports cars like the Porsche 356 if they bought the little Beetle. It turned out that this cheap car was easy to sell, and, by the 1960s, became a cultural icon among many young Americans.

Another thing that made it legendary is that its look barely changed from when it was first publicly revealed in 1938 all the way until the last model rolled off the factory line in Puebla, Mexico, in 2003. This marked nearly 60 years of continuous production, with more than 21 million units built, and although its physical appearance didn’t age a day since 1938, it did receive technological improvements over the years.

1955 Mercedes-Benz 300SL

The W198 Mercedes-Benz 300SL is known for its iconic gullwing doors and lightweight construction, which itself was based on the company’s W194 300SL race car. While many would expect a road-going version of a racing model would be heavier and slower, the W198 300SL was, in fact, still light, with its spaceframe weighing just 181 pounds and a more powerful 3.0-liter straight-six direct-injection gasoline engine that produced 219 horsepower. This might not seem much today, but these are excellent numbers for the 1950s.

But what really made the car so iconic is its gullwing doors, which is a rare feature even today. These doors weren’t actually built as a design feature — instead, the engineers who created the W194 had to use doors that ended at the mid-level of the car and opened upward because cutting into the spaceframe meant compromising the vehicle’s strength. Mercedes-Benz also only built a small number of these roadsters, producing 1,400 examples from 1954 to 1957. This meant that it’s hard to come by a good example of a W198 300SL today, with one unit sold at auction for an astounding $1,375,000.

1961 Jaguar E-Type

Long before Jaguar lost the plot and rebranded itself into something unrecognizable, it built a timeless sports car that still looks beautiful and graceful today, with the Jaguar E-Type. This vehicle was unveiled in March 1961 at Geneva and was available in both roadster and coupe forms. More than 60 years later, and the company offered it for sale as a Jaguar Classic, powered by a “restored and refined” 3.8-liter straight-six XK engine putting out 265 bhp. Again, this might not sound much today, with the latest Honda Civic Type-R producing more power, but it was pretty quick during its time.

While it started as a road car, it eventually entered racing when the FIA created the GT category for production sports cars. It had some success in British racing leagues, and the company even prepared it with a lighter all-aluminum body to compete internationally. Unfortunately, it never made the podium outside of the British Isles. Even then, it remained a popular sports car, and it still has a following to this day.

1961 International Harvester Scout

While many disagree on which car is the first modern SUV, we can say that the International Harvester Scout is one of the models being considered for the top spot. It was built to compete against the Jeep CJ but had a longer wheelbase for better practicality and is available in more configurations, making it quite the adaptive 4×4. Its old ads even claim that it’s a “quick-change artist,” telling buyers, “It’s a station wagon, a convertible, a light-duty hauler, a runabout … like having four vehicles for the price of one!”

This has got more adventurous car shoppers interested in its capabilities, especially those who want to occasionally explore the wilderness during the weekends but still want something practical for the weekdays. Other car brands soon followed suit, with the Ford Bronco and Chevy Blazer arriving on showroom floors just a few years later. Unfortunately, it was discontinued by 1980, with the brand disappearing altogether by 1984.

1962 Ferrari 250 GTO

We have to have a Ferrari in our list if we’re talking about some of the greatest cars to come out of the golden age of cars, and there is no better example of this than the Ferrari 250 GTO. IT has gotten to the point that an Italian court ruled that this car model is a work of art and that “the customization of the car’s lines and its aesthetic elements have made the 250 GTO unique, a true automobile icon,” thus only Ferrari can produce this vehicle, in the past, present, and future.

The 1962 Ferrari 250 GTO was produced in only 36 units, making it quite rare. Because of this, you rarely see a 1962 Ferrari 250 GTO go on sale anywhere, and it makes the news whenever it gets on the auction block. One example sold for $48.4 million at an auction through RM Sotheby’s in 2018, making it one of the most expensive Ferraris ever sold. Even though it has been eight years since that sale, no other 250 GTO has been sold again, at least publicly.

1963 Aston Martin DB5

One of our considerations for the “greatest cars” is its impact on culture, and one must admit that James Bond has had a sizeable impact in the movies. While the British gentleman spy drove other vehicles before and after the Aston Martin DB5, it still remains one of the most iconic in 007’s fleet. The 1964 Goldfinger was a true blockbuster that propelled Sean Connery to stardom, and as he drove the DB5 in this film, it also gained a reputation as the first true Bond car with its various gadgets like machine guns behind the headlights, tire slashers, and ejecting seats.

The DB5 is actually the first Aston Martin to feature in a Bond film — one of the interesting facts you might not know about the car — and that it also appeared in several other installments, including the latest one, No Time to Die, where it was driven by Daniel Craig. This cemented Bond’s preference for Astons, even though he was contractually obligated to drive other brands like BMWs in several other films in the franchise.

1963 Chevrolet Corvette

The first-generation Chevrolet Corvette arrived in 1953, and although it had a unique look, it was saddled with an underpowered engine and an anemic two-speed automatic transmission, making it one of the worst generations of the Corvette. However, Chevy rectified this when it released a second iteration of the quintessential American sports car in 1963 with the C2 Corvette Sting Ray. 

This model featured a more aggressive stance than the C1’s more rounded shape. More importantly, it also had a more potent 327 cubic-inch V8 that put out 340 horsepower, allowing it to go from zero to 60 in just 5.6 seconds and beat the quarter mile in 14.2.

This combination of iconic looks and good performance is what allowed the C2 Corvette, and every generation after it, to become one of the most legendary cars ever. While the first-generation was a dud, the 1963 Chevrolet Corvette (and every subsequent generation thereafter) more than made up for its shortcomings.

1964 Porsche 911

The Porsche 911 is arguably one of the most iconic cars you can buy today, and it traces its roots to the original 911 the company released in 1964. Even though it has continuously evolved over the past 60 years, you can’t deny that it has remained true to its core, with the car’s outline remaining the same (although it has certainly grown larger and heavier) throughout the decades.

The biggest change to the model line was the introduction of the type 996 in 1997, when Porsche replaced the air-cooled engine with a water-cooled one. The company received backlash from purists who considered this move sacrilege, but it was crucial for keeping the model alive as it faced the future. Today, the Porsche 911 (type 992) is available in 21 different trims and variants, from the base coupe and performance-oriented GT3 models, to Cabriolet and Targa top styles that let you enjoy the vehicle while the wind is blowing through your face.

1964 Ford GT40

Ford wanted to beat Ferrari at its own game at Le Mans in the 1960s, and it achieved this with the Ford GT40. Given that homologation rules demanded that the participants create road-going versions of their race cars and sell them to the “general” public, Ford built more than 105 GT40s (although it’s difficult to find the exact number). The limited production numbers and the fact that it took the top podium spot at Le Mans from 1966 to 1969 made this vehicle one of the most iconic American cars ever made.

We’ve now seen two more models based on this original Ford appear in the carmaker’s lineup — the first-generation Ford GT, made from 2005 to 2006, and the second-generation model, made from 2017 to 2022. These vehicles are legendary in their own right, with the Ford GT finishing in the top three spots of the 2016 24 Hours of Le Mans. However, would not exist without the legacy that the original Ford GT40 built.

1965 Ford Mustang

Of course, we cannot forget about the Ford Mustang when it comes to the greatest cars ever made. Although it might not have been the first pony car, it arguably popularized the concept single-handedly. The Mustang has been continuously on sale across seven generations, from its introduction in 1964 (as the 1965 model year) to today. During that time, it saw the many ups and downs of the automotive industry and even survived the challenges of the Malaise Era of the 1970s, the market crash of the mid-to-late 2000s, and the phase-out of sedans by American carmakers in the United States.

The Mustang might no longer be the affordable car that it once was, with the base EcoBoost Fastback model starting at $32,640. However, it’s still a quintessential part of the American car culture, and has even spawned an electric SUV under its name with the Mach-E. It also inspired competition from other brands like Chevrolet and Dodge, which is why we have iconic nameplates like the Camaro and the Charger.

1966 Lamborghini Miura

The Lamborghini Miura is often considered as the first supercar, with the vehicle offering a groundbreaking engine layout, where the 430-horsepower V12 motor is mounted transversely beneath and behind the cabin, while power is transmitted to the pavement via its rear wheels. It can hit a top speed of approximately 174 mph and a zero-to-60 time of about 6.7 seconds. This might not sound much today, with some pickup trucks capable of cutting that time nearly in half, but this was a marvel of engineering and a technical breakthrough during the ’60s.

Legend has it that Ferruccio Lamborghini complained to Enzo Ferrari himself about the poor quality of the clutches found in his vehicles, and he said something along the lines of “You may be able to drive a tractor, but you will never be able to handle a Ferrari properly,” which is why we have this iconic Ferrari rival today. While the truth of this exchange is debatable, the fact is that Lamborghini built one of the most iconic supercars with the Miura and continues to build legends today.

1966 Toyota Corolla

The Toyota Corolla isn’t something that many people would consider the greatest, especially given how common and ordinary it is. However, that is actually what makes it quite an iconic vehicle — its affordability and reliability made it the world’s most popular car, with over 50 million units sold. This is the only vehicle to achieve this feat, so far, and it has been produced continuously over 12 generations since it first arrived on the market in 1966.

Even after 60 years, Toyota has maintained the car’s reputation as a cheap vehicle that its buyers can rely on, unlike other legendary models like the Nissan Z and the Mustang, whose latest models are considerably more expensive compared to their first iterations. Although Toyota has released more affordable models compared to the Corolla in other parts of the world, it’s still the cheapest Toyota model that you can buy today in the United States, with a starting price of $23,125. This combination of price, features, and dependability makes it one of the go-to options for first-time buyers looking for a cheap, high-quality car.

1968 BMW 2002

When it comes to sports sedans, the BMW M3 is the first model that comes to mind for most people. What many do not know, however, is that the precursor of this daily driver that you can unashamedly take to track came from the 1968 BMW 2002. It actually began life as the 1600-2 and was powered by 1573cc engine that put out a measly 85 horsepower. 

However, it was said that some BMW workers hated the low output of this engine and replaced the motor with a two-liter engine on their own vehicles. They asked their company to make factory versions of their two-liter versions, and the company obliged, with the 2002 and more powerful 2002ti arriving in 1968.

The BMW 2002 was such a success that it changed the automotive landscape and created the compact sports sedan category. The German carmaker eventually released more powerful models, such as the 1972 2002tii and the 1973 2002 Turbo. This model had a few rivals in the Alfa Romeo GTV, Lancia Fulvia, and Datsun 510, but none of them had the impact that the Bavarian carmaker had on modern vehicles.

1970 Datsun 240Z

Nissan, then known as Datsun outside of Japan, introduced the Fairlady Z in its domestic market as a response to the Toyota 2000 GT sports car. It was renamed as the 240Z when it came to America and would eventually become one of Nissan’s most successful models. This was driven by its affordable $3,526 MSRP and excellent driving dynamics, which also made it one of the car company’s best sports cars ever

It has a 2.4-liter straight-six with a dual carburetor as its beating heart, putting out 150 hp to the rear wheels via a four-speed manual transmission. There’s also four-wheel independent suspension, and the total package weighed just 2,350 pounds — plus it looked sexy.

The Z has been continuously produced from then until today, except for a couple of breaks. The 300ZX ended production in 2000, and it wasn’t until 2002 that the world saw the 350Z, while Nissan retired the 370Z in 2020 and did not reveal the latest Z until 2021 for the 2022 model year. Unfortunately, the Nissan Z is no longer in the realm of affordable, with the base Sport trim starting at $42,970. It carries on the heritage of the original 240Z and maintains an outline similar to the original model from nearly 60 years ago.

1975 Volkswagen Golf

One of the things that makes a vehicle iconic is its ability to bring joy to enthusiasts without costing them an arm and a leg, and this is where the original Volkswagen Golf excelled. The GTI trim gave birth to the idea of the hot hatch, with its 100-horsepower 1.6-liter engine and improved suspension making for a dynamic driving experience. This was soon increased to 110 horsepower, allowing for a zero-to-60 time of 9.7 seconds and a top speed of 119 mph. This may not be supercar fast, but it’s good enough for its original MSRP of just $6,500.

The Golf has gone through multiple iterations over the 50 years it has been on the market, with the eighth-generation GTI still available starting at $34,590. Despite arriving nearly a decade later than the Corolla, it still boasts a sales figure of over 37 million units, making it one of the best-selling models in automotive history.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


  • Law establishes national prohibition against nonconsensual online publication of intimate images of individuals, both authentic and computer-generated.
  • First federal law regulating AI-generated content.
  • Creates requirement that covered platforms promptly remove depictions upon receiving notice of their existence and a valid takedown request.
  • For many online service providers, complying with the Take It Down Act’s notice-and-takedown requirement may warrant revising their existing DMCA takedown notice provisions and processes.
  • Another carve-out to CDA immunity? More like a dichotomy of sorts…. 

On May 19, 2025, President Trump signed the bipartisan-supported Take it Down Act into law. The law prohibits any person from using an “interactive computer service” to publish, or threaten to publish, nonconsensual intimate imagery (NCII), including AI-generated NCII (colloquially known as revenge pornography or deepfake revenge pornography). Additionally, the law requires that, within one year of enactment, social media companies and other covered platforms implement a notice-and-takedown mechanism that allows victims to report NCII.  Platforms must then remove properly reported imagery (and any known identical copies) within 48 hours of receiving a compliant request.

Support for the Act and Concerns

The Take it Down Act attempts to fill a void in the policymaking space, as many states had not enacted legislation regulating sexual deepfakes when it was signed into law. The Act has been described as the first major federal law that addresses harm caused by AI. It passed the Senate in February of this year by unanimous consent and passed the House of Representatives in April by a vote of 409-2. It also drew the support of many leading technology companies.

Despite receiving almost unanimous support in Congress, some digital privacy advocates have expressed some concerns that the new notice-and-takedown mechanism could have some unintended consequences for digital privacy in general.  For example, some commentators have suggested that the statute’s takedown provision is written too broadly and lacks sufficient safeguards against frivolous requests, potentially leading to the removal of lawful content –especially given the short 48-hour time to act following a takedown request.  [Note: In 2023, we similarly wrote about abuses of the takedown provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act]. In addition, some have argued that the law could undermine end-to-end encryption by possibly forcing such companies to “break” encryption to comply with the removal process.  Supporters of the law have countered that private encrypted messages would likely not be considered “published” under the text of the statute (which uses the term “publish” as opposed to “distribute”).

Criminalization of NCII Publication for Individuals

The Act makes it unlawful for any person “to use an interactive computer service to knowingly publish an intimate visual depiction of an identifiable individual” under certain circumstances.[1] It also prohibits threats involving the publishing of NCII and establishes various criminal penalties. Notably, the Act does not distinguish between authentic and AI-generated NCII in its penalties section if the content has been published. Furthermore, the Act expressly states that a victim’s prior consent to the creation of the original image or its disclosure to another individual does not constitute consent for its publication.

New Notice-and-Takedown Requirement for “Covered Platforms”

Along with punishing individuals who publish NCII, the Take it Down Act requires covered platforms to create a notice-and-takedown process for NCII within one year of the law’s passage. Below are the main points for platforms to consider:

  • Covered Platforms. The Act defines a “covered platform” as a “website, online service, online application, or mobile application” that serves the public and either provides a forum for user-generated content (including messages, videos, images, games, and audio files) or regularly deals with NCII as part of its business.
  • Notice-and-Takedown Process. Covered platforms must create a process through which victims of NCII (or someone authorized to act on their behalf) can send notice to them about the existence of such material (including a statement indicating a “good faith belief” that the intimate visual depiction of the individual is nonconsensual, along with information to assist in locating the unlawful image) and can request its removal.
  • Notice to Users. Adding an additional compliance item to the checklist, the Act requires covered platforms to provide a “clear and conspicuous” notice of the Act’s notice and removal process, such as through a conspicuous link to another web page or disclosure.
  • Removal of NCII. Within 48 hours of receiving a valid removal request, covered platforms must remove the NCII and “make reasonable efforts to identify and remove any known identical copies.”
  • Enforcement. Compliance under this provision will be enforced by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
  • Safe Harbor. Under the law, covered platforms will not be held liable for “good faith” removal of content that is claimed to be NCII “based on facts or circumstances from which the unlawful publishing of an intimate visual depiction is apparent,” even if it is later determined that the removed content was lawfully published.

Compliance Note: For many online service providers, complying with the Take It Down Act’s notice-and-takedown requirement may warrant revising their existing DMCA takedown notice provisions and processes, especially if those processes have not been reviewed or updated for some time.  Many “covered platforms” may rely on automated processes (or a combination of automated efforts combined with targeted human oversight) to fulfill Take It Down Act requests and meet the related obligation to make “reasonable efforts” to identify and remove known identical copies.  This may involve using tools for processing notices, removing content and detecting duplicates. As a result, some providers should consider whether their existing takedown provisions should also be amended to address these new requirements and how they will implement these new compliance items on the backend using the infrastructure already in place for the DMCA.

What about CDA Section 230?

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (“CDA”), 47 U.S.C § 230, prohibits a “provider or user of an interactive computer service” from being held responsible “as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” Courts have construed the immunity provisions in Section 230 broadly in a variety of cases arising from the publication of user-generated content. 

Following enactment of the Take It Down Act, some important questions for platforms are: (1) whether Section 230 still protects platforms from actions related to the hosting or removal of NCII; and (2) whether FTC enforcement of the Take It Down Act’s platform notice-and-takedown process is blocked or limited by CDA immunity. 

On first blush, it might seem that the CDA would restrict enforcement against online providers in this area, as decisions regarding the hosting and removal of third party content would necessarily treat a covered platform as a “publisher or speaker” of third party content. However, a deeper examination of the text of the CDA suggests the answer is more nuanced.

It should be noted that the Good Samaritan provision of the CDA (47 U.S.C § 230(c)(2)) could be used by online providers as a shield from liability for actions taken to proactively filter or remove third party NCII content or remove NCII at the direction of a user’s notice under the Take It Down Act, as CDA immunity extends to good faith actions to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable.” Moreover, the Take It Down Act adds its own safe harbor for online providers for “good faith disabling of access to, or removal of, material claimed to be a nonconsensual intimate visual depiction based on facts or circumstances from which the unlawful publishing of an intimate visual depiction is apparent, regardless of whether the intimate visual depiction is ultimately determined to be unlawful or not.” 

Still, further questions about the reach of the CDA prove more intriguing. The Take It Down Act appears to create a dichotomy of sorts regarding CDA immunity in the context of NCII removal claims.  Under the text of the CDA, it appears that immunity would not limit FTC enforcement of the Take It Down Act’s notice-and-takedown provision affecting “covered platforms.” To explore this issue, it’s important to examine the CDA’s exceptions, specifically 47 U.S.C § 230(e)(1).   

Effect on other laws

(1) No effect on criminal law

Nothing in this section shall be construed to impair the enforcement of section 223 or 231 of this title [i.e., the Communications Act], chapter 71 (relating to obscenity) or 110 (relating to sexual exploitation of children) of title 18, or any other Federal criminal statute.

Under the text of the CDA’s exception, Congress carved out Section 223 and 231 of the Communications Act from the CDA’s scope of immunity.  Since the Take It Down Act states that it will be codified at Section 223 of the Communications Act of 1934 (i.e., 47 U.S.C. 223(h)), it appears that platforms would not enjoy CDA protection from FTC civil enforcement actions based on the agency’s authority to enforce the Act’s requirements that covered platforms “reasonably comply” with the new Take It Down Act notice-and-takedown obligations.

However, that is not the end of the analysis for platforms.  Interestingly, it would appear that platforms would generally still retain CDA protection (subject to any exceptions) from claims related to the hosting or publishing third party NCII that have not been the subject of a Take It Down Act notice, since the Act’s requirements for removal of NCII by platforms would not be implicated without a valid removal request.[2]  Similarly, a platform could make a strong argument that it retains CDA immunity from any claims brought by an individual (rather than the FTC) for failing to reasonably comply with a Take It Down Act notice.  That said, it is conceivable that litigants – or event state attorneys general – might attempt to frame such legal actions under consumer protection statutes, as the Take It Down Act states that a failure to reasonably comply with an NCII takedown request is an unfair or deceptive trade practice under the FTC Act.  Even in such a case, platforms would likely contend that such claims by these non-FTC parties are merely claims based on a platform’s role as publisher of third party content and are therefore barred by the CDA. 

Ultimately, most, if not all, platforms will likely make best efforts to reasonably comply with the Take It Down Act, thus avoiding the above contingencies.  Yet, for platforms using automated systems to process takedown requests, unintended errors may occur and it’s important to understand how and when the CDA would still protect platforms against any related claims.

Looking Ahead

It will be up to a year before the notice-and-takedown requirements become effective, so we will have to wait and see how well the process works in eradicating revenge pornography material and intimate AI deepfakes from platforms, how the Act potentially affects messaging platforms, how aggressively the Department of Justice will prosecute offenders, and how closely the FTC will be monitoring online platforms’ compliance with the new takedown requirements.

It also remains to be seen whether Congress has an appetite to pass more AI legislation. Less than two weeks before the Take it Down Act was signed into law, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation held a hearing on “Winning the AI Race” that featured the CEOs of many well-known AI companies. During the hearing, there was bipartisan agreement on the importance of sustaining America’s leadership in AI, expanding the AI supply chain and not burdening AI developers with a regulatory framework as strict as the EU AI Act. The senators listened to testimony from tech executives calling for enhanced educational initiatives and the improvement of infrastructure needed for advancing AI innovation, alongside discussing proposed bills regulating the industry, but it was not clear whether any of these potential policy solutions would receive enough support to be signed into law.

The authors would like to thank Aniket C. Mukherji, a Proskauer legal assistant, for his contributions to this post.


[1] The Act provides that the publication of the NCII of an adult is unlawful if (for authentic content) “the intimate visual depiction was obtained or created under circumstances in which the person knew or reasonably should have known the identifiable individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy,” if (for AI-generated content) “the digital forgery was published without the consent of the identifiable individual,” and if (for both authentic and AI-generated content) what is depicted “was not voluntarily exposed by the identifiable individual in a public or commercial setting,” “is not a matter of public concern,” and is intended to cause harm or does cause harm to the identifiable individual. The publication of NCII (whether authentic or AI-generated) of a minor is unlawful if it is published with intent to “abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade the minor” or “arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person.” The Act also lists some basic exceptions, such as publications of covered imagery for law enforcement investigations, legal proceedings, or educational purposes, among other things.

[2] Under the Act, “Upon receiving a valid removal request from an identifiable individual (or an authorized person acting on behalf of such individual) using the process described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii), a covered platform shall, as soon as possible, but not later than 48 hours after receiving such request—

(A) remove the intimate visual depiction; and

(B) make reasonable efforts to identify and remove any known identical copies of such depiction.



Source link