Five ’70s Muscle Cars That Never Got The Attention They Deserved






When you think of the muscle car, you probably aren’t thinking about the 1970s. After all, the 1970s represented an era when the V8 muscle car was on life support. With the oil crisis and the introduction of CAFE standards, muscle cars, V8s, big power, and cheap fuel all became difficult to come by. At one point, it even seemed like the muscle car had had its day, and that the 1970s were writing the last chapters in the muscle car book.

Thankfully, that did not come to fruition. The V8 evolved. It got catalytic converters, new HEI ignition systems, and engineers who took more care designing cars to use less fuel. The V8 truck also helped keep the V8 alive, since trucks weren’t subject to the same strict regulatory standards as smaller passenger cars. However, even in the 1970s — a time when being a muscle car was more difficult than ever — many cars stood out.

Everyone knows about the Chevrolet Chevelle SS 454, one of the highest horsepower 1970s muscle cars. Everyone also knows the Pontiac Firebird Trans Am. Most enthusiasts will also recognize the AMC Javelin. But the depth of underappreciated 1970s muscle cars goes a lot further than that. Here are five ’70s muscle cars that never got the attention they deserved.

1970 Buick GS 455 Stage 1

The 1970 Buick GS 455 Stage 1 was a missile when it first came out. In January 1970, a bone-stock example managed to cross the quarter mile mark running at 105.5 mph in just 13.38. The 426 Hemi Barracuda did it in 13.78. The Pontiac GTO did it in 13.40. Even so, the Buick GS never got the recognition it objectively deserved.

After all, Buick sold old man’s country club cars, they didn’t sell cars that outrun HEMIs and GTOs. Under the hood, the 455 features a dedicated cam profile, high compression pistons, overbored cylinders, an iron crankshaft, and forged connecting rods. The 455 Stage 1, featuring special ported heads with larger valves, got Buick’s rating of “just” 360 horsepower and 510-lb-ft of torque. The character of the engine allowed it to pull hard at low and mid RPMs, not at the top.

The GS 455 Stage 1 is also overshadowed today by its much rarer and sought after sibling, the GSX – Buick’s rarest 70s muscle car. The GSX was the top offering, the Grand Sport revolution was at the lower end, and the 455 was in the middle. Out on the collectors market, the GSX was always the one to get. Although the Stage 1 had the speed credentials, it never really caught on.

1970 Ford Ranchero GT 429

A muscle car’s physical traits are fairly easy to sum up. In most cases, it is a two-door mid-size car that has a coupe-like silhouette. Muscle cars with weird pickup beds, although they did exist, aren’t something that jumps to mind. The 1970/71 Ford Ranchero GT is one such car. Understandably, it didn’t sell all that well, and according to AutoEvolution, only 8,000 of these were built, and just 5% of them left the factory with a 429 engine.

In its own right, the early 70s Ranchero was a beast, especially since performance figures from this era were often underrated due to insurance reasons. What is even more impressive is that, according to MotorTrend, the manual 429 GT Ranchero’s production number was only 78. This makes the Ranchero GT 429 manual six times rarer than the 1969 Dodge Charger Daytona, and yet, the current estimated value of the GT 429 is between $35,000 and $75,000.

First of all, the Chevy El Camino overshadowed it, and so did the Ford Torino Cobra with which it shared its underpinnings. With 375 horsepower and 450 lb-ft of torque, the Ranchero GT 429 was more powerful than the 1970 Pontiac GTO. The best part, it did so with a truck bed included. Hardly anyone expected a pickup-based Ford to run with the quickest muscle cars of 1971, but the 429 GT did.

1970 Mercury Cougar Eliminator

The 1970 Mercury Cougar Eliminator is not a car that managed to earn a large cult following, not when it came out, and not after. Still, the Eliminator — as it is very strongly named — is one of those cars where the more you know about it, the more confusing its obscurity becomes. The Eliminator was designed by none other than the same guy who designed the Boss 302 Mustang — Larry Shinoda. When you consider that, you kinda start seeing the connection between the two.

First, you could get the 302 Boss engine with the Eliminator, and these two were constantly compared against each other. Yet, the Eliminator has nowhere near the same level of clout the 302 has. With only 2,267 examples built, the 1970 Eliminator is also rare. Of those, only 444 left the factory with the 428 Cobra Jet — Ford’s most serious big-block of the era. The 428 Cobra Jet was officially rated at 335 horsepower.

Still, as was the case with many muscle cars from this era, this figure was grossly underrated, with real output believed to be closer to 400 horsepower. The Eliminator came with competition suspension, dual exhaust, and front and rear spoilers straight from the factory. What it didn’t come with was a Mustang badge — and in 1970, that mattered a lot. Because of that, the Cougar Eliminator is widely regarded as the most underappreciated Mercury muscle car.

1970 Plymouth Duster 340

The very point of a muscle car was to give the average American access to V8 performance at a relatively affordable price. The very outset of the 1970 Plymouth Duster 340 was exactly that — make it cheap, make it V8. As such, the original purchase price of the Duster 340 was $2,547, even with front brakes. Under the hood, the 340 offered a 340-cubic inch V8 with a power output of 275 horsepower and 340 lb-ft of torque. 

It also differentiated itself from other Duster models thanks to bigger springs, sporty rally wheels, and bigger sway bars. Hagerty called it: “Mopar’s underappreciated mini muscle car” because it was grossly overshadowed by the bigger Mopars like the ‘Cuda and the Road Runner. The Duster 340 was the smallest powerhouse of the ’70s, yet it was somehow forgotten. Moreover, the Duster 340 ran the quarter mile in 14.5 seconds at 99 mph in standard trim. 

This was enough to outrun many more expensive muscle cars from that era. It was also lighter, roomier, and faster than the 340 ‘Cuda, which cost considerably more money. Granted, the prices have started to rise, and it seems like the Duster 340 is getting its due, but for what it was, it didn’t get the attention it deserved.

AMC Rebel Machine

When writing articles such as these, it is very easy to drown in opinions and pick cars that someone else said were underrated simply because they believe they are better than they are. However, in some instances, some cars, like the 1970 AMC Rebel Machine, were objectively underappreciated. AutoEvolution called it “arguably the most underrated muscle car of all time,” because it was priced at $3,500 from the factory, yet only 2,000 of them were ever built.

Moreover, there really is no clearer sign that it didn’t get the attention it deserved than the fact that it was available for one year only. The Rebel Machine debuted at the NHRA World Championship Drag Race Finals in Dallas on October 25, 1969, and it ran mid 14s from the factory. Its engine was the AMC 390 — one of the most iconic engines from the golden era of muscle cars — and it was not just any AMC 390. 

This one was developed alongside Hurst Performance Research and featured redesigned cylinder heads, a high-flow intake, and larger exhaust manifolds, producing 340 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque. Still, none of that was enough. AMC was always the underdog, and in 1970, even a car that could run mid-14s out of the factory couldn’t change that.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Flip phones are making a comeback, but most US adults aren’t convinced enough to upgrade. 

Smartphone brands are trying new phone concepts, like flip and foldable phones, to give us a bigger screen when we want it, while still maintaining the same functionality as the smartphones we’re used to. There’s the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, for instance, and there’s even a rumor that Apple plans to release its first foldable phone

And if you remember the popular 2000s Motorola Razr, now there are rumors about the Motorola Razr 2026 — it reminds me of my old pink phone. But gone are the days of a basic keypad and a few ringtones. Smartphone brands are adding AI features, such as creating custom emoji, removing background objects from photos, and live translation. 

Yet a recent CNET survey says smartphone users aren’t sufficiently impressed by new features and concepts to consider upgrading their phones. Only 12% are motivated by AI integrations and 13% by new phone designs. Instead, price (55%) and longer battery life (52%) are the biggest drivers of their decision to get a new phone. 

If most US adults aren’t sold, why are tech brands so adamant? Let’s dive into CNET’s findings and what they mean for the future of smartphones.

  • The top three motivations for US adult smartphone owners to consider upgrading their devices are price (55%), longer battery life (52%) and more storage (38%). That’s the same top three as last year: In 2025, price was the top motivator (62%), followed by longer battery life (54%) and storage capacity (39%). 
  • Despite AI’s growing presence, only 12% of smartphone owners say AI integrations would motivate them to consider upgrading. 
  • Only 13% of smartphone owners would be motivated to consider upgrading to a new phone concept, such as a foldable or flip phone. 
  • Over half of smartphone owners (58%) experience frustration with their phone’s battery life, and 31% say their phone’s battery doesn’t hold a charge as well as it did when it was new.  

Most US adults aren’t motivated by new smartphone features and designs

Smartphone brands, like Samsung and Apple, are building in convenient features, such as a tool to remove unwanted objects from pictures, AI call screening and the ability to draft a message from a prompt. However, CNET found that US adults would consider upgrading for more practical reasons. Over half (55%) of US smartphone users are motivated by price, including 53% of Apple users and 56% of Samsung users. 

Yet brands are still exploring new concepts and features, like Apple Intelligence, a built-in AI feature. Then there’s the rumor of a book-style iPhone, potentially followed by a clamshell foldable design. But that’s not what most smartphone owners are after. 

Smartphone owners are more convinced by other design and feature factors when deciding on a new phone, such as camera features (27%) and the phone’s display or screen size (22%). Here are the top motivators to consider upgrading for all smartphone users.

Zain Awais / CNET

You’ve probably noticed the price of a basic smartphone has increased drastically over the years. Take the iPhone, for example. It was originally $600 for 4GB. But advanced features, the RAM shortage, inflation and tariffs are pushing prices even higher. Now, the baseline iPhone 17 (256 GB) is $800, and the Samsung Galaxy S26 (256 GB) starts at $900. 

There’s no way of knowing for sure, but these may be the lowest prices we’ll see on new models for a while, especially as features advance and designs become more complex. So if you’re already in the market for a new phone, you might want to think seriously about pulling the trigger now if you find a good deal.

The top upgrading motivators haven’t changed much over the years

Looking back at CNET’s survey data from 2024 and 2025, and now, people’s motivators for upgrading their phones haven’t changed much. Price, longer battery life and more storage have been top drivers in the past, and despite small dips this year, they’re still key upgrading factors.

Despite design upgrades and new features, smartphone owners are still focused on how much they’re paying and how long they can use their devices without needing a charger. Consumer sentiment about AI integrations dropped hard from 2024 to 2025, but it has edged up slightly in 2026. And smartphone owners aren’t as easily persuaded by phone color or the phone being thinner, either. 

Even with these nice-to-have capabilities, smartphone owners are looking at the basics. That includes practical features like battery life and more storage to hold their many important files, photos and apps. 

Most smartphone owners want better battery life

Taking a closer look at smartphone users’ hope for longer battery life in a new phone, over half (58%) are frustrated with their current phone’s battery life. Roughly one in three (31%) say their phone doesn’t hold a charge. 

The reality is, battery life will decline the longer you have your phone, so you may find your phone’s battery charge doesn’t last as long as it used to. Even though you can replace your phone’s battery, most phone batteries have a lifespan of two to three years before they start degrading. 

CNET Director of Editorial Content Patrick Holland examined battery life tests on over 35 current smartphones. And it’s not just iPhones that pack impressive batteries.

Based on CNET’s lab testing, the $1,200 iPhone 17 Pro Max had the best overall battery life, with a 5,088-mAh capacity. Another top performer was the $900 OnePlus 15, with a 7,300-mAh battery. 

If you’re looking for a phone with better battery life, consider one with a silicon-carbon battery to increase capacity without requiring a larger phone. The OnePlus 15, Poco F7 Ultra, OnePlus 13R and OnePlus 15R all feature silicon-carbon batteries with large capacities and all performed well in Holland’s testing. Keep in mind that other factors can impact your battery life, like your carrier’s signal, software efficiency and processor. 

Methodology

CNET commissioned YouGov Plc to conduct the survey. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. The total sample comprised 2,486 adults, of whom 2,407 owned a smartphone. Fieldwork was undertaken from April 29 to May 1, 2026. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all US adults (aged 18 plus). 





Source link