A More Fitting Flagship Than NSX Ever Was






Driving the MDX Type S around Los Angeles for a week, I had a realization. With the NSX long gone from their lineup (the last NSX was built nearly four years ago), the MDX has been the flagship vehicle for Acura for quite some time. The NSX was fantastic, and totally wouldn’t fit in Acura’s lineup today. The MDX, however, is their biggest SUV and their most expensive vehicle, with added performance coming via the Type S trim, and it reps the brand in a big way. 

Smaller Acura vehicles like the Integra Type S offer compact-hatchback performance and an ambitious entry point for brand enthusiasts, but the three-row MDX is a much better seller. The MDX typically sells double the number of units in a given year than the entry-level Integra, so no matter how much we enthusiasts love the Integra, it’s the MDX that holds up the brand name.

The MDX, while it certainly isn’t a brand-defining flagship like the NSX, or a speedy hatchback with decades of name cachet, has the weight of lofty expectations resting on its shoulders. Along with entertaining driving dynamics, the MDX needs to be fairly premium. It represents the storied luxury brand, offering the latest tech they can muster up in the most family-friendly package. Thankfully, it’s big enough and strong enough to carry the load of a demanding luxury market, and it even goes a bit further by being genuinely fun to drive.

Some pep in its step

The standard MDX is powered by a naturally-aspirated SOHC 3.5-liter V6 that makes 290 horsepower and 267 lb-ft of torque. It’s adequate, but not exactly the entertaining choice. The Type S gets its own unique engine, with some spicy turbocharging thrown into the mix. 

Specifically, the MDX Type S gets a turbocharged 3.0-liter V6 (yep, it’s technically smaller displacement) that produces 355 hp and 354 lb-ft of torque, paired with a 10-speed automatic transmission. While that might not be impressive compared to some of the luxury SUV V8 models out there, it’s certainly adequate for all your family-hauling needs and much more.

Slam your right foot to the floor and the Type S heads forward in a hurry, with snappy upshifts from the 10-speed and a bit of growl from the boosted V6 and the quad pipes. It’s not aggressive or rowdy, but it’s powerful enough to feel purposeful on the right stretch of road — it’s a big upgrade in entertainment over the standard model. Fuel economy drops between the two engines, with the standard MDX getting an EPA estimate of 22 mpg combined, and the Type S returning an estimate of 19 mpg combined (much less when you’re driving for a bit of fun), but that loss in efficiency is worth the added smiles per mile in my mind. I found myself going a few extra miles in the MDX for no reason at all, just to enjoy the drive, and that’s high praise for a three-row SUV — even if it did cost me a bit at the pump.

Smooth maneuvers

One of the MDX Type S’ other high-performance personality traits is its excellent suspension. The double-wishbone front and multi-link rear suspension, paired with the Type S’ adaptive air suspension, make for an impressive ride and better-than-you-might-expect handling capabilities. Steering isn’t exactly razor sharp, but it’s well-weighted enough for a vehicle of this size and it feels reasonably responsive. The big SUV changes direction quickly, and while I wouldn’t call it sports-car nimble, the MDX Type S is fearlessly stable.

With a curb weight of 4,776 lbs, the MDX would have every right to wallow a bit through corners, but it doesn’t. It remains flat, tracks extremely well, and the steering feels properly weighted. Few SUVs in this price range are as entertaining to drive at speed, and the MDX provides that entertainment without sacrificing comfort. 

On the highway, in the city, and on beaten-up back roads, it has an excellent ride quality to go along with its enthusiastic demeanor. Send any lengthy road trip my way, and I’d be happy to drive the miles behind the wheel of an MDX Type S. Mix in some curvy back roads, and I’ll be even happier.

An interior that doesn’t disappoint

The overall experience in the MDX is one of simple luxury. There aren’t a lot of ostentatious bits or overwhelming design details, just simple, easy-to-use features and a well-built cabin. The seats are comfortable, but, at least for the driver and front passenger, they’re well bolstered enough to provide stability on a winding mountain pass. Spend your winters taking the kids to the local ski lifts? You’ll enjoy the journey without being tossed from your seat in a corner.

Comfort features like the Type S’ standard heated and ventilated seats work quickly — excellent news for your impatient teenagers or your impatient self. More than just some small air bladders slightly pressing against your back, the seat massagers dig in a little bit, no doubt helping to relieve stress on your upcoming road trip or your stop-and-go daily commute.

In the mid-size three-row class, there aren’t too many SUVs that offer massive space in the back, and the MDX doesn’t buck that trend. Space is at a premium in the third row, and I wouldn’t want to be stuck back there as an adult for any significant period of time, but it should be enough for the kids. Rhe second row is certainly spacious enough for an average adult. The trunk is a similarly average-sized space, offering 18.1 cubic feet of storage behind the rear seats, as well as a handy drop-down floor for groceries.

The tech scratches all the itches

Two screens are in charge of the interface for all the MDX’s tech. There’s a 10.2-inch digital gauge cluster, and a 12.3-inch center touchscreen for all the various infotainment tasks. Neither screen is particularly high-resolution or sharp, especially if you compare them to the screens currently gracing dashboards in high-class German luxury SUVs, but the Acura’s screens are relatively easy to use. Figuring out the various controls happens in a hurry, as does connecting your smartphone. During my week of driving the MDX, wireless Apple CarPlay booted up quickly every time I started the SUV and never dropped out.

While it doesn’t quite provide the volume and intensity I’d expect from something with such a high component count, the 31-speaker Bang & Olufsen “Ultra” sound system is properly impressive. Audiophiles will be pleased, and it’s a big upgrade over the standard 9- and 12-speaker stereos offered in the lower trims of the MDX.

Acura calls its set of driver safety aids AcuraWatch, and most of the features in that set come standard on every MDX. Adaptive cruise control, forward collision warning, lane-keep assist, blind-spot monitoring, and road-departure mitigation are all part of the deal. The Type S gets some added tech as part of the upgraded AcuraWatch 360, like a lane-change assist, blind-spot intervention with steering avoidance, and a forward cross traffic warning. All these systems, basic ones included, are great additions and made the driving experience better, but they were a bit conservative for my taste. Adaptive cruise control, for instance, left a pretty lengthy gap between the MDX and the car ahead — one that had other cars sneaking in front of me on a regular basis.

It’ll cost more to go fast

Your basic, run-of-the-mill version of the MDX has a starting price of $53,250 (including $1,450 destination fee). It comes standard with front-wheel drive, and some pretty basic amenities: it’s a nice place to be, but not really the flagship vehicle you’ll see on the front page of all the brochures. 

Heated seats, leatherette upholstery, tri-zone climate control, an 11-speaker stereo, and wireless smartphone connectivity are all part of the basic package. For $58,650, the Technology Package gets closer to the Type S and adds features like a 19-speaker Bang & Olufsen stereo, front and rear parking sensors, and premium leather upholstery. All-wheel drive is a $2,200 add-on for base and Technology Package models.

In the middle of the lineup, there’s the MDX A-Spec, the MDX with Advance Package, and the A-Spec with Advance Package, all of which offer increasing levels of equipment like a 360-degree camera, head-up display, extra USB ports, and upgraded upholstery via materials like Ultrasuede and Milano leather. 

At the very top of the heap, though, the MDX Type S I drove around for a week — with the spicy engine and the Advance Package and Double Apex Blue paint — has an MSRP of $77,300 (plus $600 for the blue paint). And while that’s a considerable price tag, it’s worth noting that it’s only $700 more than last year’s model. There are some accessories available for the Type S, but it’s mostly a come-as-you-are deal. So, is it worth it?

2026 Acura MDX Type S verdict

At nearly $80k, the MDX Type S is in an interesting space: it straddles the line between a few different vehicles. In terms of performance SUVs it’s a bit of a bargain, but if you want the most luxury bang for your buck, it’s a bit costly. The Lexus TX, for example, offers similar luxury for a similar price to the MDX Type S, but the Lexus doesn’t feel quite as sporting. 

The new Kia Telluride is just about as luxurious as the MDX, especially on top trim levels, but it’s significantly less pricey. The Telluride lacks the performance punch of the Type S, too, even if it is more spacious.

One of the best pound-for-pound rivals for the MDX is the Genesis GV80, which has an immaculate interior, but a very snug (optional) third row of seating. German rivals like the BMW X5 and the Mercedes-Benz GLE are also worth checking out, though their performance variants get pricey in a hurry. Whatever you put it up against, the MDX Type S has a strong showing. It represents the Acura brand well, giving shoppers a place for all their stuff and a healthy splash of entertainment along the way.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Another day, another politically motivated attack in the United States.

This morning’s shooting at a Dallas ICE detention facility – where a sniper killed two detainees and wounded another before taking his own life prompted me to revisit a question that’s been troubling me: Is political violence actually increasing in America, or does it just feel that way?

To explore this, I’ve conducted what I’ll call a methodological experiment.

Rather than relying on traditional datasets, I’ve used ChatGPT and Claude to construct a synthetic index of political violence in the US since 1945. Let me be absolutely clear: this isn’t conventional data. It’s data generated through language models, with all the limitations that implies.

The Methodology (and Its Limitations)

Here’s what I did: I asked both ChatGPT and Claude to generate lists of politically motivated violent incidents since 1945, then had them score each incident’s severity on a scale where 50 represents a “normal” level.

The models assessed both casualties and symbolic significance, and I used them to cross-check each other’s work. I then quality-checked the output myself and categorised perpetrators by political affiliation where this was clearly established.

This approach is, admittedly, unorthodox. Language models are trained on existing texts and may reflect biases in their training data. They might overweight highly publicised events or recent incidents that featured prominently in their training corpus.

The “data” we’re looking at is essentially a structured synthesis of what these models have absorbed about American political violence.

Yet there’s something intriguing here. These models have processed vast amounts of information about political violence – news reports, academic studies, government documents. Their output might capture patterns that traditional datasets miss, though it might also amplify certain narratives or blind spots.

What the Synthetic Data Reveal

With those caveats firmly in mind, the patterns that emerge from this exercise are concerning. The model-generated index shows a clear upward trend in political violence over the past decade.

Looking at the breakdown by perpetrator ideology (where clearly established), the data suggest that right-wing extremist groups have been responsible for the majority of incidents in recent years, though we cannot draw conclusions about today’s attack whilst investigations are ongoing.

The synthetic data align with some empirical observations. Princeton’s Bridging Divides Initiative recorded over 600 incidents of threats and harassment against local officials in 2024 – a 74% increase from 2022. The University of Maryland found that in the first half of 2025, 35% of violent events targeted U.S. government personnel or facilities – more than twice the rate in 2024.

The Charlie Kirk Assassination and Recent Patterns

The September assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk marked a particularly dark moment.

The incident followed numerous recent acts of political violence, including the murder of Minnesota Democratic state Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband, and two assassination attempts on President Trump in 2024.

What the synthetic data reveal is not just increased frequency but a shift in patterns. While overall levels of physical political violence remained low in 2024 compared to years prior, acts of vigilante violence grew as a proportion of all reported incidents.

We’re seeing less organised group violence and more lone-wolf attacks – a pattern that’s harder to predict and prevent.

The Epistemological Challenge

When we use language models to generate “data” about social phenomena, what exactly are we measuring? We’re essentially extracting structured information from the collective corpus of human writing about these events. It’s aggregating distributed information, but through an AI intermediary rather than traditional data collection methods.

This raises fascinating questions.

The models suggest that right-wing extremist violence has been responsible for a fairly large majority of U.S. domestic terrorism deaths since 2001. But how much of this reflects actual patterns versus the way these events are covered and discussed in the sources the models were trained on?

The synthetic data are, in a sense, a mirror of our collective discourse about political violence. They reflect not just what happened, but how we’ve talked about what happened. That’s both a limitation and, potentially, a feature – understanding the narrative landscape around political violence might be as important as counting incidents.

An Experimental Tool

I’ve built an interactive app (using the AI coding tool Lovable) based on this language model-generated violence index.

Users can explore the synthetic data, examine patterns across different time periods and perpetrator groups, and understand the methodology behind it. Think of it as an experiment in using AI to structure historical information rather than a definitive dataset.

The value isn’t in treating this as gospel truth, but in what it reveals about how these events are recorded, remembered, and synthesised in our collective digital memory.

When language models trained on our civilisation’s text output show rising political violence, it tells us something – even if that something is as much about narrative as about underlying reality.

This morning’s tragedy in Dallas reminds us that behind every data point – whether traditionally collected or AI-generated – there are real victims and real consequences. Understanding the patterns, however imperfectly, is the first step toward addressing them.

Try the tool here.





Source link