Free travel for Minnesota’s Congress members, staff is bipartisan


WASHINGTON – Since early last year, Minnesota’s members of the U.S. House and their staffers have taken dozens of free trips to France, Israel, Greece, Mexico and other destinations.

A MinnPost analysis of “gift travel” filings found that both Democrats and Republicans in Minnesota’s congressional delegation have joined colleagues from all other states to take advantage of a congressional perk – trips whose every expense is paid for by special interests.

From Jan. 1, 2025, until the end of May of this year, the eight members of Minnesota’s delegation to the House and their staffers took 74 such trips.

Sometimes lawmakers and staff take free trips in an honest effort to learn more about an issue and meet people who will help them understand those issues. But often the sponsors of those trips have an agenda and providing free travel is a way for lobbyists and other special interests to gain favor with a lawmaker or an influential congressional aide.

The MinnPost analysis found that Rep. Tom Emmer, R-6th District, accepted the most gift travel. That’s likely because many trips were offered to Emmer since he holds a politically powerful position as House majority whip.

Emmer’s office did not return requests for information about the trips he accepted.

But records show Emmer and his staffers took 29 trips during the 15-month period studied. For instance, Emmer and five of his staffers traveled to Israel last August at the expense of the American Israel Education Foundation, a non-profit established by AIPAC, the nation’s leading pro-Israel lobbying group.

Emmer’s trip, alone, was valued at $30,921. The lawmaker took his wife, Jaqueline, along on the trip.

The trips Emmer’s staffers took to Israel cost less. For instance, the cost of the gift trip accepted by Dennis Nalls, who has recently left Emmer’s whip office to become a lobbyist, was $17,447.

Rep. Michelle Fischbach, R-7th District, was accompanied by her husband, Scott, on her trip to Israel. The cost of that trip, $31,542, was also paid for by the American Israel Education Foundation.

Fischbach and Rep. Pete Stauber, R-7th District, were both on a trip to Greece hosted in April of 2025 by the Republican Main Street Partnership. That’s an organization founded to support Republican moderates that has, especially since President Donald Trump won a second term in office, shifted to the right.

The cost of sending Stauber and his wife Jodi to Athens and other points in Greece was $15,014. Fishbach’s trip was valued at about $8,000.

In her post-travel filing, Fischbach said the trip was necessary because she serves on the House Ways and Means Committee and “thus attending to the study of how U.S. funding is continuing to help the country.”

The reason Stauber took the trip was that, as a member of a panel with authority over transportation and infrastructure, he hoped “to study infrastructure preservation” in Greece, he said in a filing.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-5th District, also took some free foreign travel last year, to Mexico City. She was accompanied by her husband Tim Mynett. The trip, which involved meetings with Mexican officials, was valued at $1,677.

“It is crucial for progressives in Congress to understand how U.S. policies are impacting people, from immigration policies to the lack of regulation of guns to tariffs,” Omar said in a statement about her trip to Mexico. “What I heard on the ground will be pivotal for me to take back to Minnesota and Washington to be a better legislator for our community.”

Omar’s trip, which included a $66 fee for a translator, was funded by the PanAmerican Exchange, Inc.  

Even a short, one-day domestic trip can be pricey.

Stauber took two staffers with him on a trip to Kenner, La., on March 11 that was paid for by Arena Energy, an oil and gas company.

One of the staffers who accompanied Stauber on the trip was Shawn Rusterholz, a former lobbyist for the American Petroleum Institute.  The total cost of the trip for the three travelers was $8,919.

The lawmaker who authorized the fewest free trips was Rep. Kelly Morrison, D-3rd District, who is a freshman Democratic  lawmaker in a chamber controlled by the GOP. 

Morrison approved a trip to Israel for one of her staffers that was paid for by the J Street Education Fund, a organization that is linked to a pro-Israel group that, unlike AIPAC, is critical of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 

In the past 15 months, staffers of Minnesota’s congressional delegation have accepted free trips to France, Sweden, Ireland, Thailand, Japan, the United Kingdom, Jackson Hole, San Francisco, New Orleans and other points, near and far, paid for by special interests.  

Gift travel taken by staffers is often considered a perk for working on Capitol Hill.

Unforeseen loopholes

Gift travel existed in Congress for decades with few guardrails or oversight. But about 25 years ago, scandals that involved pricey outings to Scotland and elsewhere, paid for by notorious lobbyist Jack Abramoff, prodded Congress to implement tough new travel regulations.

But after that scandal, in which Abramoff was charged with bribery, Congress approved legislation that banned trips that are “planned, organized, requested, arranged, or financed in whole or in part by a lobbyist or foreign agent, or in which a lobbyist participates.”

Members of Congress and their staffers were required to seek permission from the House Ethics Committee to accept a free trip, provide an agenda and breakdown of expenses and file post-travel reports. And greater transparency was provided about gift travel.  

Privately-funded travel dropped after the new restrictions were put in place. Additional restrictions were implemented in 2021. But there is evidence the popularity of gift travel is on the upswing.

According to LegiStorm, lawmakers took 2,455 trips, with a total value of $10.4 million, in 2024. But just in the first six months of 2025, lawmakers accepted 1,824 trips with a value of about $9.6 million.

Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the nonprofit consumer advocacy group Public Citizen, said the restrictions on privately funded travel, which he advocated, have some unforeseen loopholes.

The largest one was seized upon by AIPAC, which simply “set up a foundation on paper” to continue to lead all others in providing lawmakers with free trips, Holman said.

Others involve “consultants” and other representatives of special interests who simply don’t file as lobbyists but perform the same function.

“What we find is that many who should register as lobbyists don’t and are not subject to the same public scrutiny,” Holman said.

He also found that while lobbyists are barred from traveling with lawmakers or their staff, they can show up at the trip’s destination.

There is another type of trip taken by lawmakers and their staffers. Those are the congressional delegation trips, or CODELs, that are considered official business and paid for – and approved – by congressional committees and use taxpayer dollars.

“They provide more transparency,” Holman said.

Yet he also said privately-funded travel can help broaden the knowledge of lawmakers and their staff if done properly. “They can be valid trips if they are financed by an entity that wants to educate, not get something back,” he said.

Many Minnesota congressional offices did not respond to requests for comment. But the office of Rep. Betty McCollum, D-4th District, sent a statement.

“Approved travel directly relates to legislative assistants’ policy portfolios, including national security, climate policy, artificial intelligence, and the congresswoman’s leadership as co-chair of the congressional Burma caucus,” the statement said.

It also said “sponsored congressional staff travel undergoes review and approval by the House Ethics Committee.”



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link