I cracked open a ‘1,000W’ portable charger after it failed me in minutes – the cause was clear (and gooey)


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Google Gemini

Lance Whitney/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Google is downloading a 4GB file to the PCs of many Chrome users.
  • The file is harmless and is used for the Gemini Nano on-device LLM.
  • You’ll see it if you’ve opted into the on-device AI setting in Chrome.

Google is silently saving a Chrome-related file to many computers. That’s nothing earth-shaking. But this file is a hefty 4GB in size, which has caught the attention of some Google watchers. What is the file, why is it being installed, and how can you check for it?

Also: I let Chrome’s AI agent shop, research, and email for me – here’s how it went

In a new blog post, computer scientist Alexander Hanff, aka the Privacy Guy, pulled back the curtain on this mysterious file. Named weights.bin, the file is being downloaded deep within the user data folder of many Chrome users. The file itself is related to Gemini Nano, which Google is using as the on-device AI model for Chrome users.

If you delete the file, it comes back

Though there’s nothing risky or dangerous about the file, Hanff and others have expressed concerns that it’s being downloaded without users’ knowledge or permission. And if you delete the file, it eventually comes back, Hanff said. That by itself is hardly alarming; that’s part of any software update. Rather, some of the criticism centers on the file’s size. If you have ample hard disk space, then 4GB is likely not a big deal. But if you’re running low, that big a file might chew up space you can’t spare.

Traditionally, AI models like Gemini use the cloud to interact with you. Submit a request, ask a question, or kick off a conversation, and the AI taps into its online data and resources to respond. But that method can be slow and naturally requires that you be connected. By traveling between your device and the cloud, your data can also be exposed.

A trend has emerged in which companies are experimenting with locally stored LLMs (large language models). That not only speeds up the process, but it also means you can use the AI offline and more securely. Gemini Nano has already been in play on Google’s own Pixel phones.

That explains why the file is so large; it has to pack in a lot of data. In this case, a weights file contains numbers that measure the level of importance an AI model assigns to your input. The AI uses these values to determine what should come next. For example, let’s say you start typing the phrase “Why did my new phone cost me an arm and a…” at the prompt. The AI assigns weights to your input to help it predict that the next word would be “leg.”

Also: This powerful Gemini setting made my AI results way more personal and accurate

How can you tell if the file has been downloaded to your PC? First, open Chrome, go to Settings, and select System. On the System screen, check whether the On-device AI option is turned on. If so, then you probably have the file or will soon get it.

To double-check, you’ll have to navigate to the user folder on your PC. That location varies based on your operating system. On my Windows 11 PC, I ran a search in File Explorer for weights.bin. The search took a long journey through the following path: C:\Users\lance\AppData\Local\Google\Chrome\User Data\OptGuideOnDeviceModel\2025.8.8.1141. At that final location, the weights.bin file appeared, measuring 4GB.

Since the file is downloaded again if you simply delete it, you’ll have to take an extra step to get rid of it permanently. After you delete the file, go back to Settings in Chrome and select System. Then  turn off the switch for On-device AI.

But as long as you have enough disk space (and if you can’t spare 4GB, then it’s time to clean up your drive), the file is little cause for concern. Just forget about it, especially if you’re keen to try on-device AI, and we’ll see what the future holds for Gemini Nano.





Source link