How Long Do Inline-6 Engines Tend To Last And Can You Extend Their Lifespan?






Inline six engines, also commonly known as straight sixes, are widely regarded in the enthusiast community as some of the smoothest and simplest engine layouts, a fact inherent to their design. But while their smoothness was never in question, what about their reliability?

Granted every single block design is always going to have its good, bad, and ugly designs. On one hand, you have the AMC and Jeep straight six, Toyota 2JZ, and Jaguar XK6 — all unquestionably amazing engines. On the other, you have terrible sixes like the Mercedes M104, Triumph TR6 family, and… this is a trigger word, I apologize — the Land Rover Ingenium. That’s a pretty wide breadth of reliability to cover, so where’s the middle ground? Is the straight six a good configuration in general or not?

Personally, I think so, and I have the physics and mechanical knowledge to back it up. My name’s Maddie, and I’m a straight six addict. I’ve driven and worked on these engines beginning with my very first car, my mom’s 2001 Jeep Cherokee. I now have a ’96 Cherokee, a car I’ve owned for 16 years, and an R34 Skyline — again, both with straight sixes. Each car behaves quite differently as well; my Jeep’s six is a deep-breathing gas engine LARPing as a diesel. My Skyline’s revs to 7k RPM with vigor and aplomb.

On paper, these engines are worlds apart. But in terms of reliability, not so much — in fact, despite their differences, both are well over 100k miles and still strong engines. Moreover, as an enthusiast and former tech, I’ve seen and worked on many in excess of 500k or more miles. Here’s how you can get your six’s odometer that high, too.

The secret to the straight six is in its construction

The nice thing about straight sixes is how smooth they are, and that’s because the engines have inherently near-perfect balance characteristics. Think of them like two inline threes stuck together end to end. Each piston has a corresponding opposite in the other “block,” and both of these pistons cancel each other out. That means there’s a net-zero vertical and lateral force exerted on the block. It also means you don’t need stuff like counterweights to help offset these forces, which keeps the block’s internals relatively simple. No split crankpins, balance shaft, and so on.

That said, straight six engines aren’t exactly perfect. For one, they take up a lot of room in the engine bay, which is why BMW always cants its engines to the side. It means you necessarily have a big, long nose; or otherwise have to jam your engine under the windshield like on the AMC Pacer — its engine bay was originally supposed to have a Wankel rotary before GM cancelled the project at the last moment.

In some ways, this actually helps a lot with maintenance. Because you have a long, thin engine, theoretically you have plenty of space on either side for working. My Jeep was an excellent learning tool for procedures like changing spark plugs because of this very reason. Conversely, my Skyline’s engine is so long that to get at the timing belt, I have to remove the radiator to get enough clearance to do the crank pulley. So there is a trade-off in some respects, but for the most part, older straight sixes are dead-simple, and simplicity generally equals reliability.

How can you make straight-sixes last longer?

Read these three words like Gospel: Do the maintenance. Seriously, that’s it. Just do the maintenance, and don’t skimp out on parts. My Skyline’s water pump cost like $400 to import an OEM part, but I could’ve gotten a sketchy knockoff for about ¼ that price. I’m someone who enjoys daily driving her classic cars, so guess which pump I bought? This goes for everything, too — you get what you pay for with these engines.

Straight sixes tend to be creatures of extremes these days. You either have the old workhorses from the 20th century or the fancy twin-turbo BMW units of today, and not much in between. Yes, it’s a given that the latter are more expensive and difficult to work on, but the fact remains that you also need to do the maintenance with both.

In short, my Cherokee’s engine lasted well beyond 200,000 miles and counting because I do the maintenance, don’t drive hard when the engine’s cold, and I don’t ask the engine to operate outside its design parameters. It really is that straightforward. Don’t stray from the recommended intervals, especially with high-mileage engines, and practice good driving habits. This means driving sympathetically — don’t lug your engine, don’t idle for long periods when it’s cold, don’t overstrain it by revving it, and so on. It really is miraculous what these engines can do when drivers don’t abuse them to within inches of their lives.

Some of the longest-lasting engines are sixes. I mean, there’s a reason why most trucks still use straight sixes. It’s a simple and durable block construction, but it’s not idiot-proof. If you bear that in mind, you’re golden.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link