The Surprising Reason Why Scientists Are Placing Underwater ‘Boomboxes’ In Jamaica’s Coral Reefs






Rising sea temperatures and periods of extreme heat have caused the bleaching of coral reefs all over the world, and Jamaica’s reefs were hit by a particularly significant bleaching event in 2023. Scientists and researchers watched in horror as corals died after losing the algae that they needed for their survival, but there was nothing they could do to stop it. In the space of just a few weeks, reefs around the country went from being lively, noisy habitats for numerous species to being deathly quiet.

Events like these cause catastrophic long-term damage, but scientists still haven’t given up hope on regenerating the reefs. They’re now betting on an unusual method to help speed up the recovery process: underwater speakers that play the sounds of a healthy reef. The process, first detailed by Climate Central, involves recording the sounds of healthy reefs in other areas, where fish, crustaceans, and other inhabitants all generate a unique soundtrack.

This soundtrack is then played through a loudspeaker that’s placed within the degraded reef, and it can help attract fish and coral larvae back to the area. Multiple studies have shown that these soundtracks can make a difference, with one study published in the Nature journal finding that juvenile fish were significantly more likely to settle on degraded reefs if the loudspeakers were playing a recording of a healthy reef.

Studies have shown that loudspeakers are effective

The Nature study took place on the Great Barrier Reef off the coast of Australia, and focused on observing the differences between numbers of juvenile fish on degraded reefs that played a healthy reef soundtrack, versus those that didn’t. Meanwhile, other studies have suggested that the soundtrack might be able to attract certain species of coral larvae, albeit only during a narrow window in their lifecycle.

Research carried out by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution found that golfball coral larvae, placed in cups on reefs in the U.S. Virgin Islands, were more likely to settle if they were played a healthy reef soundtrack through a waterproof underwater speaker. However, it only worked during the first portion of their larval stage. Later on, they proved to be a lot less choosy, and the soundtrack didn’t make a notable difference. The results suggested that targeting certain species during specific periods could help maximise the effect of the loudspeakers, although further research is still needed to get a broader picture of exactly which species are most responsive to the audio signals and when.

The findings from these and other studies will all help shape the exact methods scientists use when they’re deploying reef loudspeakers in the future, but the overall message seems clear. Fish and coral can indeed be influenced by the presence of underwater boomboxes playing what they want to hear, but boomboxes alone aren’t going to be enough to fix the damage done during mass bleaching events.

Scientists are also employing other reef restoration techniques in Jamaica

As well as installing loudspeakers, Climate Central reports that researchers in Jamaica are also growing coral fragments to help repair the reef. Researcher Bethany Dean at the Alligator Head Foundation says that developing ways to help coral reproduce was another important way to boost the chances of recovery, since natural reproduction was slowing.

The coral fragments she grows in the lab will eventually be placed onto artificial reefs that are based around sculptures created by Italian artist Marco Barotti. Barotti adds that the current project is “very different from everything I did before,” but that “sound has always been at the core of my work.” For now, whether or not this combination of coral, sculptures, and artificial noise will be enough to successfully regenerate the reefs remains an open question.

Climate change has damaged plenty of other habitats alongside coral reefs, although nature continues to show a remarkable ability to recover in other places. To take just one example, scientists monitoring deforestation with satellites found that the surprisingly simple strategy of leaving them to regenerate unassisted was enough to significantly increase forest cover over time. Although coral reefs have needed scientists to take a more active approach to regeneration than rainforests, there’s still a chance that they’ll be able to rebound with the right assistance.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link