Speeding costs you — and doesn’t actually save much time


Speeding in your car to work, to pick up your children from school, or go from one errand to the next not only wastes money in gas and sends harmful emissions into the air, it barely saves you time, new research says.

It is something to think about as gas prices stay elevated throughout the summer months and add pain to day-to-day driving and seasonal road tripping.

Instead, abiding by posted speed limits can save U.S. drivers millions of dollars at the gas pump and eliminate millions of gallons of fuel each day, according to a study published Thursday in the Nature journal Communications Sustainability. That is fuel that, when burned, emits planet-warming gases into the atmosphere. To top it all off, changing driving habits wouldn’t even add a full minute to a driver’s commute.

University of Minnesota researchers analyzed 120 million vehicle trips across the United States from four Wednesdays in 2021 using driving data on national road networks, speed limits and U.S. Geological Survey elevation data. The analysis included roads with speed limits of 45 mph (72 kph) and higher.

More than 43% of the studied trips included at least one instance of speeding, and drivers spent nearly 12% of their driving time going faster than the speed limit.

They found that if drivers of light-duty, conventional internal combustion engine vehicles actually drove at posted speed limits, it could save an average of $22 million, based on fuel costs at the time, 6.7 million gallons of fuel and 57,000 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide every day. The researchers said that is comparable to taking about 5.5 million passenger vehicles off the road.

And while drivers say that speeding saves them precious time, researchers found that is not really the case. With an average daily driving distance of 28.6 miles (46.03 kilometers), driving at or below the posted limit corresponds only to about 54 seconds longer per day.

“If your goal is to shave one minute off your time, then you’ve got to drive fast. If your objective is to get to your destination safely and to save fuel, then you might drive slower than the speed limit,” said William Northrop, mechanical engineering professor at the University of Minnesota and study co-author.

The research considered battery-electric vehicle efficiency only in California given the level of EV adoption in the U.S. at that time. Based on the California modeling, “We find that driving slower is beneficial for EVs as well,” he said.

Interestingly, the study found differences among states. Nevada saw elevated speeding prevalence as well as high speed excess. There was high speeding prevalence in Florida, Georgia and North Carolina, though those states did not necessarily exhibit high speed excess. Montana, Wyoming, Idaho and South Dakota showed both low speeding prevalence and speed excess.

The cost of faster driving today

Driving faster increases a vehicle’s energy use and the emissions from its engine, as well as reduces efficiency. Vehicle engines have become increasingly more efficient over the past several decades even as vehicles have gotten bigger and more powerful. But speed limits have also climbed since the Emergency Highway Energy Conservation Act was implemented, which mandated 55 mph national speed limits amid the 1970s energy crisis.

Accounting for the average cost of gas today and more vehicle miles traveled, that increases to roughly $26 million and 7.2 million gallons of fuel that Americans collectively could save each day this year just by not putting the pedal to the metal.

One limitation of the research is that slower driving could impact traffic patterns, which could play a role in efficiency.

However, it is especially timely as U.S. drivers remain price-sensitive to volatile gas prices as the war in Iran has sent the cost for a gallon of fuel above $4 this year. Experts have said there are a number of ways to improve one’s gas mileage, including something as simple as slowing down. Less fuel needing to be purchased because of better efficiency could influence oil market demand, which in turn could impact pricing.

Rob Middleton, associate research scientist of mechanical engineering at the University of Michigan who was not involved in the research, said the study was well-done. But he also noted that the fuel saved from driving more slowly still only represents a fraction of daily gasoline consumption in the U.S., which is about 375 million gallons daily.

“It’s a big number, but it’s a small fraction,” Middleton said. “This is a ‘freebie’ in that it doesn’t really cost anyone anything to do.”

“The market penetration of selling EVs is still small, so we still need fuel, we still need ICE (internal combustion engine) vehicles, we’re still going to have them for a very long time,” he added. “Things that we can do to either make the new ones better or to improve our fuel supply, we need to do.”

___

Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ast.john@ap.org.

___

Read more of AP’s climate coverage.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Misinformation about sunscreen makes up a small portion of TikTok videos about the subject, but those posts are disproportionately popular and widely shared, a new study finds.

Wellness topics are commonly affected by misinformation spread online. That includes content related to sunscreen — a crucial tool in preventing skin cancer. A new peer-reviewed study conducted by researchers at the University of Alberta found that misinformation on TikTok receives higher audience engagement compared to pro-sunscreen content. 

The study looked at 971 of the most-viewed TikTok videos about sunscreen and found that the most-viewed videos had anti-sunscreen messaging. These videos only made up a small fraction of content found on TikTok (6%), compared to pro-sunscreen videos (86.8%). And only 1.5% of the posts the researchers reviewed claimed sunscreen caused harm.

Although there are fewer anti-sunscreen videos, these attract the most attention because the messaging is more provocative, the researchers said. Public health officials have been concerned about the anti-sunscreen movement that claims, falsely, that sunscreen is harmful or prevents the health benefits of sun exposure. Among the myths these messages spread include that sunscreen causes cancer, it blocks the absorption of Vitamin D and that it’s toxic to humans. The popularity of this content on TikTok could influence viewers, particularly younger ones, to avoid it altogether. 

It’s not surprising that many Americans turn to social media for health advice. A Pew Research Center survey released in April found 36% of Americans reported getting health information at least sometimes from social media. (And 22% said they got health information from AI chatbots.) Wellness influencers know how to make particularly engaging content, which makes it easier for others to believe the message they’re sharing — even if it’s false or misleading. 

Experts attribute the willingness of Americans to believe sunscreen misinformation to a wide range of factors.

“I think sunscreen skepticism grew out of a few overlapping movements: clean beauty, distrust of institutions, fear of synthetic ingredients and a general wellness culture that tends to frame ‘natural’ as automatically safer,” Dr. Melanie Palm, a board-certified dermatologist and cosmetic surgeon at Art of Skin MD, tells CNET. Sensationalized messages spread easily on social media because they feed on real human fears. 

Although there’s relatively more pro-sunscreen TikTok content, experts believe the messaging for this has been short-sighted as well. The study found that the majority of sunscreen content promoted on TikTok was mainly centered around its beauty benefits, versus only 6% mentioning cancer risk reduction.

“For many people, especially younger people, photoaging feels more relevant than cancer prevention,” Palm says. Not that sun protection lacks beauty benefits. ”I don’t think it’s wrong to talk about the beauty benefits of sunscreen because sunscreen does help prevent brown spots, uneven tone, collagen breakdown, and premature aging,” Palm says. 

Since sunscreen content has leaned more towards the beauty angle, its skin cancer prevention messaging has been downplayed. “Dermatologists and brands need to say it [sunscreen can prevent skin cancer] more clearly, and we need to say it in plain language,” Palm says. The problem is that often the facts on social media sound like a lecture. Palm believes experts can work on explaining themselves better without diluting the science and being less dismissive if a patient is worried about sunscreen use.

“We can say, ‘I understand why that sounds concerning — here is what the evidence actually shows, and here are options if you prefer mineral sunscreen, tinted sunscreen, fragrance-free formulas or newer filters,’” Palm suggests. 

Palm recommends experts active on social media focus on shorter videos, simpler analogies and real-life examples of sun damage. That’s just one piece of the equation. Sunscreen manufacturers marketing their products on social media often use fear-based language. Palm recommends that they focus on educating the public instead. This includes explaining common terms such as “broad-spectrum” or why it’s important to reapply sunscreen. “Show sunscreens on different skin tones, because if a product leaves a white cast or pills under makeup, people are not going to wear it daily,” Palm says. 

With research showing that more people are receiving their news from social media, it’s prime time for experts to appear as relatable as possible when sharing content on social platforms. Sunscreen brands can aim to educate younger people on the importance of skin protection and still speak about its beauty benefits. Even if you’re sharing the truth on social media, the way you get that message across is just as important if you want to reach a greater audience. 





Source link