Apple WWDC: What tech fans got right (and wrong) about iOS 27, Tim Cook, and more


big-guessing-game-guesses-revealed-zdnet.png

Cole Kan/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


Apple’s WWDC keynote went live on June 8th, setting the stage for announcements on upcoming features and software updates, but not without the usual predictions and speculation.  

Also: Everything announced at Apple WWDC 2026 – including Siri, iOS 27 dev beta, and more

This year, we wanted to hear what you thought. We asked ZDNET readers five questions relating to features and software updates in round one of our Big Guessing Game contest. For every correct answer, we’ll give you an entry into a drawing to win the latest Apple Watch in September. 

The results for Round 1 are in, but if you missed it — don’t worry, there will be two more rounds of questions you can still partake in. 

Here’s what ZDNET readers predicted for WWDC

Apple executives at WWDC 2026

Kerry Wan/ZDNET

1. What’s the most underrated Apple Intelligence feature?

The first question was a freebie. If you answered it, you got an entry into the contest. We wanted to hear what you considered a more useful feature than Apple gave it credit for. Hot takes encouraged, of course. 

There were some common themes: almost 10% of responders mentioned advanced voice control and natural language, which was an integral part of Siri’s evolution. Some noteworthy responses that highlight our readers’ insight: 

“The ‘quiet plumbing’ features that turn the camera and OS into a real-time understanding layer.”   

And: 

“Siri becoming a true system-level context engine instead of ‘just a voice assistant.'” 

2. Which longstanding Android feature will Apple finally add to iOS 27?

Nearly 10% of respondents called out AI-generated wallpapers and backgrounds, something Apple mentioned while showing off the new Image Playground features. During the demo, we saw generative AI creating backgrounds for group texts and the lockscreen. 

Also: 3 new MacOS 27 features make it worth upgrading right away for me – Siri included

We also got several responses for a universal back button — something Android has locked into the core OS, regardless of what app you’re in. On an iPhone, there’s no “universal back”, it depends on the app’s interface. The closest equivalent is to swipe up and access the App Switcher window. 

3. How many times was “Siri” mentioned at WWDC 2026?

We have the number, and it’s exactly 106. While no respondent guessed that exact number, we’ll say anyone with an answer number plus or minus 10 gets it right. Several people fall into that category, with quite a few saying “100”, and the closest response was just 5 away. 

4. How much screen time (in minutes) will outgoing CEO Tim Cook get during WWDC?

Tim Cook WWDC 2026

Apple

Tim Cook introduced the show and closed it out at the very end, with a (very) subtle acknowledgement of his stepping down as CEO, his statement that “it’s been an honor of a lifetime” punctuating the end of his nearly 15-year tenure at the company’s head. 

His combined segments lasted right around four minutes, so we marked it correct for anyone plus or minus two minutes. This was much more brief than the majority of respondents, who guessed he would be on-screen closer to eight, 10, or 15 minutes.

Question 5: If Apple does unveil new hardware at WWDC, what will it be?

As much as we wanted to hear about a foldable iPhone, no new hardware was announced during WWDC, something that 27% of you guessed correctly.

Round 2: July 7th, 2026

Thanks to everyone who participated! As mentioned, everyone who submitted an answer for the first question got an entry into the drawing, but the more correct answers you have, the more chances you have to win. 

Also: How to download the iOS 27 developer beta right now (and which models support it)

The second round launches on July 7th and will focus on Apple’s devices, so be sure to check back in to share your expertise on Apple’s upcoming product launches. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Today, when one pictures a “classic Dodge Charger”, the first image that pops up is almost certainly one of the highly desirable Charger models from the late 1960s or early ’70s. Indeed, those early muscle car Chargers are iconic, playing a starring role in the “Dukes of Hazzard” television show and, somewhat more recently, “The Fast and the Furious” films. But as time ticks on, is it time to start appreciating the modern version of the Charger as a potential modern classic?

It’s now been over 20 years since Dodge brought back the Charger nameplate for a spacious four-door sedan with an optional HEMI V8 engine. While the basic Charger R/T was a potent machine for its time, Dodge really took the Charger’s game to the next level for the 2006 model year with the debut of the Charger SRT8. 

The SRT8 model used a larger version of the third-gen HEMI V8 that, combined with other performance upgrades, transformed the sedan into a serious performance car capable of running with its 1960s HEMI ancestors at the drag strip — to say nothing of its vastly superior handling and refinement. In the years that followed, Dodge would continue to improve the Charger’s performance with larger and more powerful HEMI engines, but the significance of the original Charger SRT8 is not to be overlooked.

A muscle car legend reborn for the 2000s

Today, with the modern Charger being such an established part of the car enthusiast world, it’s easy to forget some of the controversy that surrounded its mid-2000s return. Most of it focused on the fact that the beloved muscle car nameplate had been brought back for a four-door sedan rather than a retro-styled coupe. Fortunately, those people looking for that retro coupe would be satisfied by the reborn Dodge Challenger when it arrived a few years later, while the Charger went on to become a highly popular muscle sedan in its own right.

The addition of the SRT8 model to the lineup certainly helped, of course. Under the hood was the larger 6.1-liter HEMI V8, which differed from the standard 5.7-liter HEMI in several ways, not least the displacement. With the 6.1 under the hood, the SRT8 made 425 hp and 420 lb-ft of torque, easily laying down a mid-13-second quarter-mile time in Motor Trend’s hands. This was very quick by mid-2000s standards, especially considering the now-outdated five-speed automatic transmission.

But the SRT8’s performance went beyond just the drag strip. As part of the SRT transformation, Dodge also gave the car larger wheels and tires, a retuned suspension setup, and large Brembo brakes. While this didn’t necessarily make the car an agile road course weapon, it did give the SRT8 an athleticism that belied the Charger’s weight and size. 

The evolution of modern Dodge muscle

What’s even cooler about this era in Chrysler/Dodge performance history is that the Charger was just one of the four-door LX platform cars that the automaker offered with SRT badges and a powerful HEMI engine under the hood. Apart from the Charger, buyers could also choose from the more upscale, but ultimately short-lived SRT version of the Chrysler 300C sedan or the Dodge Magnum SRT8 station wagon.

The original Charger SRT8 marked the beginning of a long run of increasingly powerful, high-performance models. In the early 2010s, the Charger SRT8’s 6.1 HEMI was replaced by the larger and more powerful 6.4/392 HEMI, with that motor eventually becoming available in the less expensive Charger R/T Scat Pack. Then, of course, came the Charger SRT Hellcat, with a 707-hp, supercharged 6.2-liter that turned the car into a genuine super sedan.

So is the original Charger SRT8 a guaranteed future classic? Classified listings show that clean examples still bring decent money today, but the fact that it was followed by improved models may ultimately limit its potential for becoming a true, mega-desirable collector car. Regardless, though, the Charger SRT8’s accomplishments in modern muscle car history are not to be taken lightly.





Source link