How Childcare Deserts Affect Families


The Bureau of Labor Statistics tells us about families with children:

  • In 2025, 32.9 million families had children younger than 18 years old.
  • Both parents were employed in 66.3% of these families.
  • All parents are employed in 70% of the families with children under age 6.

No need to do the math.

We can just say that lots of families need childcare.

Childcare Deserts

But adequate childcare is a problem.

Not only do parents need to be sure that their child receives adequate care but many also consider the tradeoff between the cost and what they earn. In addition, women especially bear the emotional burden (sometime called mental load). And now, with inflation continuing and the Iran War further escalating prices, affordability is a #1 issue.

So too is finding care if you live in a childcare desert.

According to a report from the Center for American Progress 46% of America’s children live in a childcare desert:

childcare deserts

There are fewer licensed childcare facilities in minority and rural communities. Among the most deficient states, we would include Idaho with 83% of its young children in a childcare desert. Even worse, it’s 96% in Alaska and 95% for Hawaii. By contrast, 21% of the children below 6 in Massachusetts live in childcare deserts while for New Jersey it’s 25%, Nebraska, 25%, and Washington D.C., 5%.

It would have been better if the dominant color of this map were blue:

childcare deserts

 

Our Bottom Line: Demand and Supply

As economists, we could say that demand and supply are the problem In childcare markets.

Childcare demand constrains the income licensed facilities can earn. Many have limited incomes that diminish their daycare budget. With free care from grandma a possibility, some families cap what they can pay through the cost paycheck tradeoff. When care is too expensive, one parent could stay home or grandma could kick in.

Meanwhile, on the supply side, childcare facilities face income limits that then get passed to what they pay their employees. Also, they are coping with increasing costs that include food, supplies, insurance, rent or mortgage payments. But it’s their low pay that makes it tough to get enough staff–one reason for childcare deserts.

Where are we? We wind up with high cost and low supply.

My sources and more: Thanks to Emily Peck’s Axios Markets for inspiring today’s post. From there, we found the details in this deserts report and a BLS press release. And of course, it all returns us to the landmark research on women and the workforce from Nobel Laureate Claudia Goldin.

 



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Virtually every new SUV will depreciate in value over its life as the miles rack up and components start to wear out. However, some of them depreciate much faster than others. At one end of the spectrum, there are some models from the likes of Cadillac, Tesla, and Infiniti, all of which can lose close to two-thirds of their value after just half a decade on the road. That makes them some of the worst-depreciating SUVs on the market. At the other end, there are SUVs like the Toyota Land Cruiser.

The exact resale value of any used car will depend on factors like its trim, condition, and mileage, but on average, Land Cruiser owners can expect a higher trade-in value than most rivals will fetch. According to data from CarEdge, a new Land Cruiser can be expected to lose around 35% of its original value after five years on the road, assuming it covers around 13,500 miles annually.

Estimates from iSeeCars make for equally encouraging reading for Land Cruiser owners, with the outlet estimating that after five years, a new example will lose just 34.4% of its sticker price. Even after seven years on the road, iSeeCars estimates that the average Land Cruiser will still be worth a little over half of what buyers originally paid for it.

The Land Cruiser holds its value well

The estimate from iSeeCars puts the Land Cruiser slightly ahead of average for value retention in the large hybrid SUV segment, and significantly ahead of the overall market average for new SUVs. According to the same data, the average new SUV can expect to lose 44.9% of its value over the same period, over 10% more than the Land Cruiser. That said, a different Toyota SUV is forecast to retain even more of its value.

Since the 2025 model year, both the Land Cruiser and the 4Runner have shared their platform and hybrid powertrains. However, according to current estimates, the 4Runner is the clear winner when it comes to resale value. Data from iSeeCars forecasts that a new, non-hybrid 4Runner is likely to lose only 25.4% of its value after its first five years, and CarEdge predicts almost exactly the same figure. According to the former outlet, a hybrid 4Runner will lose slightly more of its value over the same timeframe, shedding 28.6% on average.

While the 4Runner is the better choice purely for value retention, that only forms part of the equation for most buyers. The Land Cruiser remains appealing thanks to its mix of off-road capability and on-road refinement, with even the base 2026 trim offering plenty of standard features, despite missing out on the luxuries that higher trims include.





Source link