How International Harvester Tried (And Failed) To Kill The Diesel Engine







It’s no exaggeration to say that diesel engines basically run American commerce. If there’s anything heavy that needs to move a long distance, there’s a good chance of diesel being involved. But back in the 1960s, many engineers actually believed that they were on borrowed time. The thinking was that diesel engines were too heavy and too finicky — almost too quaint for the burgeoning demands of commerce.

Somehow, the gas turbine emerged as the obvious heir — after all, it spent World War II powering aircraft. And if it could power planes, it could drive heavy trucks too. The military was thinking along the same lines. For instance, the M1 Abrams tank later became one of the most well-known wins of turbine power over diesel.

Most of the trucking industry was sold on the turbine dream. Ford, GM, Mack, Kenworth, Freightliner, and even the Chrysler turbine car program were all onboard. The wave also included International Harvester, one of the biggest names in American trucks and farm equipment at the time. However, its approach was a bit different. While many of the aforementioned companies tried to develop their own turbine, IH actually took a shortcut — it acquired San Diego-based Solar Aircraft Co. in 1960, as reported by The Autopian. Solar had been building gas turbines for stationary and marine applications for decades and had racked up 10 million collective operating hours across its product line. By 1963, it became a full IH subsidiary.

IH’s first turbine experiment involved strapping a Solar engine to a farm tractor – the HT-341. While it made plenty of headlines, it wasn’t very practical. It was loud, complicated, and drank way too much fuel. IH shelved it by 1967, but it wasn’t done with the idea.

The truck of the future that wasn’t

That same year, it decided to mate an actual semi with a turbine. Development on what would become the Turbostar began in 1967, and the truck made its public debut on January 11, 1968. The base for it was a CO-4000 cabover — a 6×4 configuration that IH also sold under the TranStar name. That said, the new turbine version did get a few tweaks. This included a smaller grille opening, a slightly raised ride height, and quad headlights — though there’s nothing that would make you do a double-take.

What sat under that cab was interesting, though. Solar’s B-series turbine weighed in at around 1,585 pounds, which was just half the mass of a comparable diesel of the period. It made 300 horsepower, spun at 34,000 RPM internally, and stepped that down to 4,000 RPM at the output shaft. A custom recuperator captured waste heat from the exhaust and recycled it to improve fuel economy. IH also dropped the standard 10-speed transmission in favor of a five-speed. Moreover, because the turbine ran cool enough to skip a radiator entirely, that whole cooling system simply didn’t exist. IH called it the “Truck of the Future” and told the press turbines would be commercially ready by the early 1970s.

Unfortunately, revolutionary as it was, the turbine truck never really caught on. Diesel engines just continued to improve, getting lighter, cheaper, and more powerful. Truckers, being practical people, just did not see a reason to switch to something unproven. Eventually, IH pulled the plug. As for Solar, well, it actually stuck around. It found a comfortable home in oil field operations — and that business was thriving.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







In the ever-shifting geopolitical sphere, China’s growing military presence and the ongoing tensions over Taiwan and the South China Sea continue to be a closely watched topic — particularly in regard to China’s ambition for naval power. In recent years, much speculation has been made over the country’s rapid military development, including the capabilities of the newest Chinese amphibious assault ships.

While there’s no denying its military advancements and buildup, much has been made about the logistical and military difficulties that China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) would face if it launched an amphibious invasion of Taiwan. However, there’s growing concern that if a Taiwan invasion were to happen, it wouldn’t just be military vessels taking part in the action, but a fleet of commercial vessels, too — including a massive new car ferries that could quickly be repurposed into valuable military transports.

While the possibility of the PLA using commercial vessels for military operations has always been on the table for a potential Taiwan invasion, the scale with which China has been expanding its commercial shipbuilding industry has become a big factor in the PLA’s projection of logistical and military power across the Taiwan Strait. It’s also raised ethical concerns over the idea of putting merchant-marked ships into combat use.

From car ferry to military transport

The rapid growth of modern Chinese industrial capacity is well known, with Chinese electric vehicle factories now able to build a new car every 60 seconds. Likewise, China has developed a massive shipbuilding industry over the last 25 years, with the country now making up more than half of the world’s shipbuilding output. It’s from those two sectors where China’s latest vehicle-carrying super vessels are emerging. 

With a capacity to carry over 10,000 new vehicles for transport from factories in Asia to destinations around the world, these ships, known as roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) ferries, are now the biggest of their type in the world. The concept of the PLA putting civilian ferries into military use is not a new one, or even an idea China is trying to hide. Back in 2021, China held a public military exercise where a civilian ferry was used to transport both troops and a whole arsenal of military vehicles, including main battle tanks.

The relatively limited conventional naval lift capacity of the PLA is something that’s been pointed out while game-planning a Chinese amphibious move on Taiwan, and it’s widely expected that the PLA would lean on repurposed civilian vessels to boost its ability to move soldiers and vehicles across the Taiwan Strait. With these newer, high-capacity Ro-Ro ferries added to the fleet, the PLA’s amphibious capacity and reach could grow significantly.

A makeshift amphibious assault ship

However, even with the added capacity of these massive ferries, military analysts have pointed out that Ro-Ro ships would not be able to deploy vehicles and soliders directly onto a beach the way a purpose-built military amphibious assault ship can. Traditionally, to deploy vehicles from these ships, the PLA would first need to capture and then repurpose Taiwan’s existing commercial port facilities into unloading bases for military vehicles and equipment.

However, maybe most alarming is that satellite imagery and U.S. Intelligence reports show that, along with increasing ferry production output, the PLA is also working on a system of barges and floating dock structures to help turn these civilian ferries into more efficient military transports. With this supporting equipment in place, ferries may not need to use existing port infrastructure to bring their equipment on shore.

Beyond the general military concern over China’s growing amphibious capability, there are also ethical concerns if China is planning to rapidly put a fleet of civilian merchant vessels into military service. If the PLA were to deploy these dual-purpose vessels into direct military operations, the United States and its allies would likely be forced to treat civilian-presenting ships as enemy combatants. On top of all the other strategic challenges a Taiwan invasion would bring, the U.S. having to navigate the blurred legal lines between military and merchant vessels could potentially give China a strategic advantage amidst the fog of war.





Source link