How Wristwatch History is About More Than Time


Watches are not only about telling time.

Wristwatch History

Armies

During wartime, the military requires synchronization.

Fighting the Second Boer War in 1900 or so, soldiers “jerry-rigged pocket watches and strapped them on their wrists.” (Especially if you were holding a rifle, it was impractical to reach into your pocket to check the time.)

Fast forwarding to World War I, the wristwatch starts to take off as does a small company called Wilsdorf and Davis. However, the watches they made needed a name so, as they explained, like Kodak, they made up one and called it the Rolex.

A journalist described a World War 1 battle that depended on the time:

“The watch hands [on the officers’ wrists] pointed to the second which had been given for the assault to begin, and instantly, to the tick, the guns lifted and made a curtain of fire round the Chateau of Hooge, beyond the Menin road, six hundred yards away.”

Navies

Navies also required “portable time.” They needed their watches for precisely calculating longitude. As a result, the British government offered a prize that, in today’s money, would have been close to 2 million dollars. Responding in 1735, John Harrison invented a marine chronometer that let them know the spread between local time and Greenwich Mean Time. Each one hour equaled 15 degrees of longitude.

Railroads

During most of the 19th century, different towns and cities and villages–anyone–could decide the time. You can imagine how tough it was to create a train schedule. I assume that passengers could have a 10:30 arrival time at one destination and 10:15 for the next one.

But then, in 1883, the railroads decided to tell us what time it was. They drew four (sort of) vertical lines. While state boundaries did not matter, economic connections did. When it was 11 am in the East, it would be 8 am in the West. Established by the train schedules, everyone knew what time it was supposed to be.

As a result, on Sunday, November 18, 1883, clocks, watches and schedules across the U.S. adjusted to reflect the standardized time. On the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Line, all conductors were told to move their watches back 28 minutes.

So yes, they needed watches. While at first it was pocket watches, after World War I, companies manufactured railroad wristwatches that met higher accuracy and durability standards.

Our Bottom Line: Private and Social Return

Long ago, Edwin Mansfield (1930-1997), a University of Pennsylvania economist, said that a seemingly small innovation can have a large impact through its private and social return. Although he was referring to manufacturing inputs like thread, he could easily have been talking about the wristwatch. Its private return, as profit, initially went to watchmakers like Rolex. Next, a larger second phenomenon kicks in. Rippling across millions of individuals, a social return creates the positive externalities that bring benefits to countless individuals.

With the wristwatch, about more than time, those externalities related to winning wars, navigating ships, and synchronizing railroads.

My sources and more: The idea for today’s wristwatch history began with yesterday’s walk. Listening to the Acquired  5 hour podcast on Rolex  I learned the entire story of a watch brand and much more. Then, wanting to see where the wristwatch went, I went to the Atlantic and the Rolex website. And finally, economic historian David Landes’s (1924-2013) Revolution in Time is a classic. (Before the watch, Landes told us that some 15th century soldiers brought a rooster for a wakeup call.)

Our featured image is from UnconstrainedTime. Also please note that several of today’s sentences were in past econlife posts.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Researchers in South Korea developed a wearable system that uses seven smart rings to read finger and hand motions to translate American Sign Language and International Sign Language into text. The purpose is to make communicating easier between those who sign and nonsigners without needing a separate human interpreter. 

AI Atlas

According to the study, published Friday in the journal Science Advances, the system reliably recognized 100 ASL and ISL words during testing. It also performed well with users the system had not seen before, and it didn’t require recalibration for each person. Because the system detects words in sequence, it can produce sentence-level translations without extra training on grammar. 

ASL and ISL are the everyday languages of more than 72 million deaf and hard-of-hearing people. However, most hearing people do not know any words in these languages or have a very basic understanding. That gap makes certain tasks, like ordering at a restaurant or asking for help, much more difficult. 

A graphic shows two illustrated people talking in sign language, ASL and ISL. The graphic also shows the different components of the ring as well as pictures of hands modeling the rings.

A concept of how the rings work in the real world. 

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Existing sign language translator prototypes often rely on bulky gloves that can distract from or block natural hand movement or feel uncomfortable for the wearer, which limits real word adaption. Camera-based technologies can work well in controlled environments but are often limited to those places where a camera can be set up with a clear line of sight, the researchers wrote. 

To solve these problems, the researchers designed sensing rings for each finger that can capture precise motion and finger position while letting the hands move naturally. The rings can detect both signs that involve movement, like the words for “dance,” “fly” and “sun,” and signs that are held still, like “I” and “you.”

“These advances suggest that [the device could enable] barrier-free public translation systems for unseen users and unrestricted daily assistive interfaces,” the authors wrote in the study. 

The authors are affiliated with Yonsei University, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies and the Korea Institute of Science and Technology, among others. While the technology is still experimental, the authors wrote that the technology has the potential to ease communication difficulties. The underlying idea could also help improve controls for other systems, like virtual or augmented reality.

“Beyond sign language translation, the ring-type, wireless, and modular architecture of (wirelessly connected, ring-type sign language translators) may also be extended to other gesture-driven applications such as virtual or augmented reality control, touchless device interfaces, or rehabilitation monitoring systems where fine-grained hand movement tracking is essential,” they wrote.





Source link