Just Ask Jenna Looks at Movie Distractions


by Jenna C, ’26Just Ask Jenna questions | econlife

Dear Jenna,

I was at a movie the other night, and right when it got to an important scene, the person next to me kept checking their phone. The screen lighting up was already distracting, but then their phone started buzzing and even rang once. It completely took me out of the moment, and I could tell other people around us were getting annoyed too. The person on their phone probably didn’t think it was a big deal, but it affected everyone trying to watch the movie.  Why does one person‘s behavior end up impacting everyone else like that?

From,
Distracted in the Dark

Just Ask Jenna answers | econlife

Dear Distracted in the Dark,

What you are describing is a really clear example of something in economics called an externality and once you start thinking about it, it shows up in way more situations than you would expect.

An externality happens when one person‘s actions create a cost or benefit for someone else who is not directly involved in the decision. In your case the person checking their phone gets the benefit of doing what they want at the moment, but the cost gets pushed onto the rest of the audience. You and everyone around you become that third-party, even though you had no control over the situation.

What makes this concept more interesting is that externalities can go both ways. They can be negative, like your example, where the experience of watching the movie is disrupted, but they can also be positive. For example, when someone is fully engaged and respectful in a shared space, it helps maintain the experience for everyone else. It’s the same idea just with a different outcome.

Once you start viewing situations through this lens, it is hard to unsee. It becomes clear that most decisions are not just individual, they have spillover effects. Your example is a small one, but it reflects a much bigger idea that shows up in everything from shared spaces like theaters to traffic to environmental issues.

Best of luck!
Jenna 

Disclaimer

The information provided from Just Ask Jenna is for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information shared, the author makes no guarantees of any kind regarding completeness, accuracy, or suitability for any particular purpose.

All opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent any affiliated organizations or entities. We also wanted to note that we are exploring the use of AI in generating topics.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Virtually every new SUV will depreciate in value over its life as the miles rack up and components start to wear out. However, some of them depreciate much faster than others. At one end of the spectrum, there are some models from the likes of Cadillac, Tesla, and Infiniti, all of which can lose close to two-thirds of their value after just half a decade on the road. That makes them some of the worst-depreciating SUVs on the market. At the other end, there are SUVs like the Toyota Land Cruiser.

The exact resale value of any used car will depend on factors like its trim, condition, and mileage, but on average, Land Cruiser owners can expect a higher trade-in value than most rivals will fetch. According to data from CarEdge, a new Land Cruiser can be expected to lose around 35% of its original value after five years on the road, assuming it covers around 13,500 miles annually.

Estimates from iSeeCars make for equally encouraging reading for Land Cruiser owners, with the outlet estimating that after five years, a new example will lose just 34.4% of its sticker price. Even after seven years on the road, iSeeCars estimates that the average Land Cruiser will still be worth a little over half of what buyers originally paid for it.

The Land Cruiser holds its value well

The estimate from iSeeCars puts the Land Cruiser slightly ahead of average for value retention in the large hybrid SUV segment, and significantly ahead of the overall market average for new SUVs. According to the same data, the average new SUV can expect to lose 44.9% of its value over the same period, over 10% more than the Land Cruiser. That said, a different Toyota SUV is forecast to retain even more of its value.

Since the 2025 model year, both the Land Cruiser and the 4Runner have shared their platform and hybrid powertrains. However, according to current estimates, the 4Runner is the clear winner when it comes to resale value. Data from iSeeCars forecasts that a new, non-hybrid 4Runner is likely to lose only 25.4% of its value after its first five years, and CarEdge predicts almost exactly the same figure. According to the former outlet, a hybrid 4Runner will lose slightly more of its value over the same timeframe, shedding 28.6% on average.

While the 4Runner is the better choice purely for value retention, that only forms part of the equation for most buyers. The Land Cruiser remains appealing thanks to its mix of off-road capability and on-road refinement, with even the base 2026 trim offering plenty of standard features, despite missing out on the luxuries that higher trims include.





Source link