Regular vs. Smart Thermostats: Everything You Wanted to Know


At CNET, we’ve been testing smart thermostats for years, so it’s always a little surprising to hear, “What’s a smart thermostat?” But only a fraction of American households, around 17%, actually use smart thermostats. That’s too bad, because they’re one of my favorite smart home innovations, and offer handy advantages for almost everyone

So, what’s the difference, aside from flashy new touchscreen designs? I’ll take you through what’s new with these thermostats and how your heating and cooling will never be the same (neither will your energy bills).

Scheduled heating and cooling

A woman reaches to an Ecobee Essential thermostat on a white wall.

Thermostats like Ecobee’s allow for easier scheduling from a distance.

Ecobee

Both smart and traditional thermostats have programmable settings, letting you set temperature thresholds for specific hours and specific days of the week, and changing them as seasons change. The biggest difference is that smart thermostats make this much easier.

With old programmable thermostats, you’re mostly stuck doing programming with the thermostats’ manual controls. Smart thermostats allow you to set schedules from the app, no matter where you are, and you can usually save and switch between schedules on the fly, making the process significantly smoother.

Read more: Don’t Put Your Thermostat In These Places

Costs 

You can find a standard programmable thermostat without any bells and whistles for under $20 from brands like Honeywell Home (although those with fancy touchscreens will cost more), so they’re an easy way to save money if you need a replacement. Smart thermostats, with all their added features, cost significantly more. Amazon has one of the cheapest for under $100, but for something like Nest’s 4th-gen Learning Thermostat, you’ll have to pay close to $300.

Honeywell Home thermostat on a white wall in front of a kitchen.

If you’re worried about initial costs, regular thermostats cost a whole lot less than smart thermostats.

Honeywell Home

Energy savings

Programmable thermostats will save you money, as long as you stay within strict temperature settings at certain times of day and night. Smart thermostats don’t necessarily save more, but they make saving money so much easier that houses tend to save more as a result, since very few users have time to constantly adjust a standard thermostat for maximum savings.

With settings like eco modes and monthly reports on energy savings, smart thermostats tend to save the average household significant amounts of money. Google Nest studies have estimated the average user saves around 15% on energy bills annually, while Ecobee says users can save up to 26% at the high end. That’s easily enough to cover the initial costs of a smart thermostat in a year or two.

Some smart thermostats are very pretty, but its their control options that matter.

Google Nest

Remote operation

A regular thermostat doesn’t have app connections and will, at most, have a remote control you can use from across the house. Smart thermostats, meanwhile, have Wi-Fi connections and apps. That means that as long as you have your phone and a connection, you can make thermostat changes.

For some people, this is an important feature — they can adjust the temperature while on vacation or if they forget while away from home. Others are fine making changes only when they’re at home.

Automatic learning and adjusting

A regular thermostat will heat or cool your home exactly when and how you tell it to. So will a smart thermostat — unless you enable its smarter features. Smart thermostats include learning algorithms and sensors that study activity in the house, like when people get up in the morning and start moving around.

With basic data like this, smart thermostats can start making adjustments about when to raise the heat or start cooling off, and when to hold back because there’s no one at home. Essentially, they can schedule themselves and respond to significant changes in habits.

Also, many new smart thermostats come with satellite sensors that you can place in specific rooms that traditional thermostats may not be able to “read” very well, increasing their temp-sensing accuracy. 

Ecobee's thermostat and sensor side by side.

Ecobee’s thermostat with its sensor.

Ecobee

Energy savings

Programmable thermostats will save you money, as long as you stay within strict temperature settings at certain times of day and night. Smart thermostats don’t necessarily save more, but they make saving money so much easier that houses tend to save more as a result, since very few users have time to constantly adjust a standard thermostat for maximum savings.

With settings like eco modes and monthly reports on energy savings, smart thermostats tend to save the average household significant amounts of money. Google Nest studies have estimated the average user saves around 15% on energy bills annually, while Ecobee says users can save up to 26% at the high end. That’s easily enough to cover the initial costs of a smart thermostat in a year or two.

Installation

Both smart and standard thermostats are installed the same way — by connecting various wires to the thermostat’s base plate. Both offer professional installation services as well, so there’s not much difference here.

The biggest difference is that smart thermostats won’t work as well with every home system. For example, smart thermostats won’t make a huge difference if you use radiant floor heating as your primary heat source (it’s slower to respond and doesn’t affect thermostat sensors the same way), so you may as well save money with a simpler thermostat.

A Nest thermostat sensor sitting on a white table with a temperature illustration above it.

Thermostat sensors can go anywhere to monitor specific temperatures.

Google Nest

Connections to other devices

Smart thermostats can often connect to other smart home technology, including security hubs and customized triggers, through platforms like IFTTT or Controller for HomeKit. Since smart thermostats tend to have extra sensors for humidity or air quality, they can trigger things like air purifiers, fans, dehumidifiers and more. Some smart thermostats even come with built-in voice assistants, while most at least support voice assistant control through Alexa, Google’s voice assistant and more.

Regular thermostats don’t have any of these connections, so you can’t usually connect them to home routines or set temperature triggers for other devices.

ecobee-siri-oct-12

Many smart thermostats can work with voice assistants too.

Ecobee

Bottom line

Smart thermostats make saving money much easier than regular thermostats and come with plenty of extra bells and whistles, including opportunities to connect them to voice assistants and other smart home devices. They’re also sleek, smart devices that display personalized info about your home and weather, while learning your habits and automatically adjusting heating or cooling — no micromanagement needed. Plus, unlike regular thermostats, you can control them from anywhere.

In return, the big drawback of smart thermostats is that they cost a whole lot more than a regular thermostat replacement would, although they do tend to pay for themselves within a year or two. However, not everyone is comfortable using an app for scheduling or letting a smart thermostat make changes itself, so some users may find themselves uncomfortable with the change.

Ready to learn even more? See our guide on the best settings to use on your smart thermostat for the season, the easiest steps to save on heating and cooling bills, and the best smart home devices overall. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Flip phones are making a comeback, but most US adults aren’t convinced enough to upgrade. 

Smartphone brands are trying new phone concepts, like flip and foldable phones, to give us a bigger screen when we want it, while still maintaining the same functionality as the smartphones we’re used to. There’s the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, for instance, and there’s even a rumor that Apple plans to release its first foldable phone

And if you remember the popular 2000s Motorola Razr, now there are rumors about the Motorola Razr 2026 — it reminds me of my old pink phone. But gone are the days of a basic keypad and a few ringtones. Smartphone brands are adding AI features, such as creating custom emoji, removing background objects from photos, and live translation. 

Yet a recent CNET survey says smartphone users aren’t sufficiently impressed by new features and concepts to consider upgrading their phones. Only 12% are motivated by AI integrations and 13% by new phone designs. Instead, price (55%) and longer battery life (52%) are the biggest drivers of their decision to get a new phone. 

If most US adults aren’t sold, why are tech brands so adamant? Let’s dive into CNET’s findings and what they mean for the future of smartphones.

  • The top three motivations for US adult smartphone owners to consider upgrading their devices are price (55%), longer battery life (52%) and more storage (38%). That’s the same top three as last year: In 2025, price was the top motivator (62%), followed by longer battery life (54%) and storage capacity (39%). 
  • Despite AI’s growing presence, only 12% of smartphone owners say AI integrations would motivate them to consider upgrading. 
  • Only 13% of smartphone owners would be motivated to consider upgrading to a new phone concept, such as a foldable or flip phone. 
  • Over half of smartphone owners (58%) experience frustration with their phone’s battery life, and 31% say their phone’s battery doesn’t hold a charge as well as it did when it was new.  

Most US adults aren’t motivated by new smartphone features and designs

Smartphone brands, like Samsung and Apple, are building in convenient features, such as a tool to remove unwanted objects from pictures, AI call screening and the ability to draft a message from a prompt. However, CNET found that US adults would consider upgrading for more practical reasons. Over half (55%) of US smartphone users are motivated by price, including 53% of Apple users and 56% of Samsung users. 

Yet brands are still exploring new concepts and features, like Apple Intelligence, a built-in AI feature. Then there’s the rumor of a book-style iPhone, potentially followed by a clamshell foldable design. But that’s not what most smartphone owners are after. 

Smartphone owners are more convinced by other design and feature factors when deciding on a new phone, such as camera features (27%) and the phone’s display or screen size (22%). Here are the top motivators to consider upgrading for all smartphone users.

Zain Awais / CNET

You’ve probably noticed the price of a basic smartphone has increased drastically over the years. Take the iPhone, for example. It was originally $600 for 4GB. But advanced features, the RAM shortage, inflation and tariffs are pushing prices even higher. Now, the baseline iPhone 17 (256 GB) is $800, and the Samsung Galaxy S26 (256 GB) starts at $900. 

There’s no way of knowing for sure, but these may be the lowest prices we’ll see on new models for a while, especially as features advance and designs become more complex. So if you’re already in the market for a new phone, you might want to think seriously about pulling the trigger now if you find a good deal.

The top upgrading motivators haven’t changed much over the years

Looking back at CNET’s survey data from 2024 and 2025, and now, people’s motivators for upgrading their phones haven’t changed much. Price, longer battery life and more storage have been top drivers in the past, and despite small dips this year, they’re still key upgrading factors.

Despite design upgrades and new features, smartphone owners are still focused on how much they’re paying and how long they can use their devices without needing a charger. Consumer sentiment about AI integrations dropped hard from 2024 to 2025, but it has edged up slightly in 2026. And smartphone owners aren’t as easily persuaded by phone color or the phone being thinner, either. 

Even with these nice-to-have capabilities, smartphone owners are looking at the basics. That includes practical features like battery life and more storage to hold their many important files, photos and apps. 

Most smartphone owners want better battery life

Taking a closer look at smartphone users’ hope for longer battery life in a new phone, over half (58%) are frustrated with their current phone’s battery life. Roughly one in three (31%) say their phone doesn’t hold a charge. 

The reality is, battery life will decline the longer you have your phone, so you may find your phone’s battery charge doesn’t last as long as it used to. Even though you can replace your phone’s battery, most phone batteries have a lifespan of two to three years before they start degrading. 

CNET Director of Editorial Content Patrick Holland examined battery life tests on over 35 current smartphones. And it’s not just iPhones that pack impressive batteries.

Based on CNET’s lab testing, the $1,200 iPhone 17 Pro Max had the best overall battery life, with a 5,088-mAh capacity. Another top performer was the $900 OnePlus 15, with a 7,300-mAh battery. 

If you’re looking for a phone with better battery life, consider one with a silicon-carbon battery to increase capacity without requiring a larger phone. The OnePlus 15, Poco F7 Ultra, OnePlus 13R and OnePlus 15R all feature silicon-carbon batteries with large capacities and all performed well in Holland’s testing. Keep in mind that other factors can impact your battery life, like your carrier’s signal, software efficiency and processor. 

Methodology

CNET commissioned YouGov Plc to conduct the survey. All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. The total sample comprised 2,486 adults, of whom 2,407 owned a smartphone. Fieldwork was undertaken from April 29 to May 1, 2026. The survey was carried out online. The figures have been weighted and are representative of all US adults (aged 18 plus). 





Source link