The Condom Shortages That Oil Creates


To make a condom you need synthetic rubber and silicone oil.

And that is the problem.

Condom Shortages

To our list of products that depend on the Strait of Hormuz, we can add condoms.

Because of raw material shortages, soaring freight rates, and route disruptions, Karex, the world’s largest condom maker will be raising prices by as much as 30%. The oil-hungry recipe for making one-fifth (5 billion) of the world’s condoms includes ammonia, nitrile, and packaging materials as well as synthetic rubber and silicone oil. Karex’s CEO said that production has to be halted if just one of the 100 intermediate products they use is unavailable. In addition, he worries about the panic buying and hoarding that could exacerbate any condom shortages.

A U.S. Karex subsidiary has already seen its prices rise. The cost of latex, foil wrappers, and the plastics in packaging are up as much as 30%. Meanwhile the 25% increase for condom lubricant sounds low when compared to the whopping 100% price pop for nitrile, a non-latex condom ingredient.

Our Bottom Line: Shipping delays

One reason for higher prices is shipping delays. Explaining, Karex CEO, Goh Miah Kiat, said “We’re seeing a lot more condoms actually sitting on vessels that have not ⁠arrived ​at their destination but are highly required…”

Avoiding the Persian Gulf, the diverted shipping traffic adds 10 to 14 days when it travels around the Cape of Good Hope. By extending travel time, the longer routes diminish container availability and reduce global shipping capacity by 10% to 15%. As a result, we wind up with “vessel bunching” in places like Jeddah. (Saudi Arabia), Salalah (Oman) and Singapore where newly arrived vessels line up for birth and storage space.

And all of this affects our condom supply.

My sources and more: Always interesting, the BBC podcast Unexpected Elements inspired today’s post. From there, I added to our facts  though the NY Times and CNN. And finally, we learned more about shipping delays from the Eurasia Review.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Virtually every new SUV will depreciate in value over its life as the miles rack up and components start to wear out. However, some of them depreciate much faster than others. At one end of the spectrum, there are some models from the likes of Cadillac, Tesla, and Infiniti, all of which can lose close to two-thirds of their value after just half a decade on the road. That makes them some of the worst-depreciating SUVs on the market. At the other end, there are SUVs like the Toyota Land Cruiser.

The exact resale value of any used car will depend on factors like its trim, condition, and mileage, but on average, Land Cruiser owners can expect a higher trade-in value than most rivals will fetch. According to data from CarEdge, a new Land Cruiser can be expected to lose around 35% of its original value after five years on the road, assuming it covers around 13,500 miles annually.

Estimates from iSeeCars make for equally encouraging reading for Land Cruiser owners, with the outlet estimating that after five years, a new example will lose just 34.4% of its sticker price. Even after seven years on the road, iSeeCars estimates that the average Land Cruiser will still be worth a little over half of what buyers originally paid for it.

The Land Cruiser holds its value well

The estimate from iSeeCars puts the Land Cruiser slightly ahead of average for value retention in the large hybrid SUV segment, and significantly ahead of the overall market average for new SUVs. According to the same data, the average new SUV can expect to lose 44.9% of its value over the same period, over 10% more than the Land Cruiser. That said, a different Toyota SUV is forecast to retain even more of its value.

Since the 2025 model year, both the Land Cruiser and the 4Runner have shared their platform and hybrid powertrains. However, according to current estimates, the 4Runner is the clear winner when it comes to resale value. Data from iSeeCars forecasts that a new, non-hybrid 4Runner is likely to lose only 25.4% of its value after its first five years, and CarEdge predicts almost exactly the same figure. According to the former outlet, a hybrid 4Runner will lose slightly more of its value over the same timeframe, shedding 28.6% on average.

While the 4Runner is the better choice purely for value retention, that only forms part of the equation for most buyers. The Land Cruiser remains appealing thanks to its mix of off-road capability and on-road refinement, with even the base 2026 trim offering plenty of standard features, despite missing out on the luxuries that higher trims include.





Source link