The Cost Price Squeeze That Crushes Farmers


The American Soybean Association says the U.S. farmer is in a “cost-price squeeze.”

Let’s take a look.

Farmers’ Cost Price Squeeze

According to The Economist, farmers were coping with high costs even before Donald Trump was first elected. Between 2012 and 2017, they had seen seed costs rise by close to 18%, land prices were up 6%, and for labor, the hike was 50%.

Then tariffs hit:tariffs impact

Farmers’ Costs

Shown above as between 2% and 3% on machinery, Chinese retaliatory tariffs rose beyond 80% during 2025. Meanwhile U.S. tariffs on imported steel were close to 25%. As a result, with farm equipment makers like John Deere paying more for its inputs, researchers at Mississippi State University calculated that the cost of a 200–249 horsepower tractor was up a whopping 71%, increasing from $191,000 to $327,000. That meant, per acre, the cost moved from $27.24 to $41.11, based on 2,000 acres of use.

From there, we can look back at manufacturing and forward at financing. Thinking of pricier imported steel as one reason, John Deere said it absorbed tariff costs of $600 million during 2025. Meanwhile, farmers were paying more in interest to finance their equipment purchases.

Farmers’ Prices

When China abandoned the U.S. soybean farmer, exports plunged from 5.9 million tons to zero until a new trade deal emerged in 2026. Usually, by September, China had purchased 40% of the US overseas sales but in 2025, instead, they were buying from Brazil and Argentina.

China’s retaliatory tariffs made U.S. soybeans prohibitively expensive in China, but it also diminished the price elsewhere:

farmers' cost price squeeze

With Chinese demand down, price also cascaded:

farmers' cost price squeeze

 

Our Bottom Line: Factors of Production

Summarizing the U.S. farmers’ catastrophic squeeze, we can look at land, labor, and capital:

farmers' cost price squeeze

Then, to all of this we can add econlife’s description of the Iran War’s impact on the urea farmers use for fertilizers and the diesel that fuels their equipment.

Please note that I am concerned with The Economist’s and my own tariff numbers because they have fluctuated so much. What is true for a day could be inaccurate after that.

But we can be sure of the cost price squeeze that is crushing U.S. farmers.

My sources and more: Thanks to The Economist for inspiring today’s post.  From there, U.S. soybean and farmers’ associations, here and here, and this TV report had more detail.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Virtually every new SUV will depreciate in value over its life as the miles rack up and components start to wear out. However, some of them depreciate much faster than others. At one end of the spectrum, there are some models from the likes of Cadillac, Tesla, and Infiniti, all of which can lose close to two-thirds of their value after just half a decade on the road. That makes them some of the worst-depreciating SUVs on the market. At the other end, there are SUVs like the Toyota Land Cruiser.

The exact resale value of any used car will depend on factors like its trim, condition, and mileage, but on average, Land Cruiser owners can expect a higher trade-in value than most rivals will fetch. According to data from CarEdge, a new Land Cruiser can be expected to lose around 35% of its original value after five years on the road, assuming it covers around 13,500 miles annually.

Estimates from iSeeCars make for equally encouraging reading for Land Cruiser owners, with the outlet estimating that after five years, a new example will lose just 34.4% of its sticker price. Even after seven years on the road, iSeeCars estimates that the average Land Cruiser will still be worth a little over half of what buyers originally paid for it.

The Land Cruiser holds its value well

The estimate from iSeeCars puts the Land Cruiser slightly ahead of average for value retention in the large hybrid SUV segment, and significantly ahead of the overall market average for new SUVs. According to the same data, the average new SUV can expect to lose 44.9% of its value over the same period, over 10% more than the Land Cruiser. That said, a different Toyota SUV is forecast to retain even more of its value.

Since the 2025 model year, both the Land Cruiser and the 4Runner have shared their platform and hybrid powertrains. However, according to current estimates, the 4Runner is the clear winner when it comes to resale value. Data from iSeeCars forecasts that a new, non-hybrid 4Runner is likely to lose only 25.4% of its value after its first five years, and CarEdge predicts almost exactly the same figure. According to the former outlet, a hybrid 4Runner will lose slightly more of its value over the same timeframe, shedding 28.6% on average.

While the 4Runner is the better choice purely for value retention, that only forms part of the equation for most buyers. The Land Cruiser remains appealing thanks to its mix of off-road capability and on-road refinement, with even the base 2026 trim offering plenty of standard features, despite missing out on the luxuries that higher trims include.





Source link