The Inadequate Tariff Refunds For a Small Manufacturer


When the Supreme Court told President Trump that he could not use IEEPA for his tariff authority, it affected $166 billion in tariff collections for over 53 million shipments. As a result, more than 300,000 importers could submit refund claims to U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

One of those applicants is the Massachusetts chair cushion manufacturer that invented the gripper.

Let’s take a look.

Tariff Refunds

Our story begins at the Klear Vu Corporation in Fall River, Massachusetts. A 60-year-old family-run business, Klear Vu makes chair cushions. Using fabric from China, they make the cushions in Massachusetts and then sell them to customers that include Walmart and Amazon. Klear Vu’s claim to fame was the gripper, an innovation that stops cushions from sliding.

Describing their business, Klear Vu emphasized how much it depends on Chinese suppliers for their quick and efficient textiles know-how. As Klear Vu’s co-owner explained, U.S. factories could not equal his Chinese manufacturers’ competitive prices, product variety, and speedy response to their requests.

Consequently, at the beginning of the second Trump administration, the tariffs on Chinese imports hit Klear Vu hard. Commenting on the 125% tariff, Klear Vu’s co-owner, Sam Cooper, said, “That was bananas. The 125 percent was totally wild. That is effectively a trade embargo.” The alternatives though meant triple prices from Turkey and, from others, as much as 10 years to develop the fabrics they needed. So, they asked their Chinese suppliers to share the expense and domestic retail customers to accept a price hike. But none of the support sufficiently offset the tariff expense.

At that point, they told China to hold up shipments. But they never laid off workers.

Our Bottom Line: The Cost of a Tariff

Owed tariff refunds (and paying for attorneys to get them), Klear Vu can never recoup its time, dollar, and emotional costs. In addition, returning to the gripper, we can wonder if the resources diverted by the tariffs are reducing future similar innovation at Klear Vu and millions of small companies like it.

It reminds me of what we’ve repeatedly said about the British coastline. Looking closer, we see so much more.

My sources and more: A good beginning, this WSJ article had some basic stats. But actually, it all began for me with this PIIE Trade Talks podcast. I also recommend going to the Klear Vu website.

 



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Virtually every new SUV will depreciate in value over its life as the miles rack up and components start to wear out. However, some of them depreciate much faster than others. At one end of the spectrum, there are some models from the likes of Cadillac, Tesla, and Infiniti, all of which can lose close to two-thirds of their value after just half a decade on the road. That makes them some of the worst-depreciating SUVs on the market. At the other end, there are SUVs like the Toyota Land Cruiser.

The exact resale value of any used car will depend on factors like its trim, condition, and mileage, but on average, Land Cruiser owners can expect a higher trade-in value than most rivals will fetch. According to data from CarEdge, a new Land Cruiser can be expected to lose around 35% of its original value after five years on the road, assuming it covers around 13,500 miles annually.

Estimates from iSeeCars make for equally encouraging reading for Land Cruiser owners, with the outlet estimating that after five years, a new example will lose just 34.4% of its sticker price. Even after seven years on the road, iSeeCars estimates that the average Land Cruiser will still be worth a little over half of what buyers originally paid for it.

The Land Cruiser holds its value well

The estimate from iSeeCars puts the Land Cruiser slightly ahead of average for value retention in the large hybrid SUV segment, and significantly ahead of the overall market average for new SUVs. According to the same data, the average new SUV can expect to lose 44.9% of its value over the same period, over 10% more than the Land Cruiser. That said, a different Toyota SUV is forecast to retain even more of its value.

Since the 2025 model year, both the Land Cruiser and the 4Runner have shared their platform and hybrid powertrains. However, according to current estimates, the 4Runner is the clear winner when it comes to resale value. Data from iSeeCars forecasts that a new, non-hybrid 4Runner is likely to lose only 25.4% of its value after its first five years, and CarEdge predicts almost exactly the same figure. According to the former outlet, a hybrid 4Runner will lose slightly more of its value over the same timeframe, shedding 28.6% on average.

While the 4Runner is the better choice purely for value retention, that only forms part of the equation for most buyers. The Land Cruiser remains appealing thanks to its mix of off-road capability and on-road refinement, with even the base 2026 trim offering plenty of standard features, despite missing out on the luxuries that higher trims include.





Source link