The most essential component for any PC


Thinking of setting up your first gaming PC? While it can be all too easy to get carried away with the idea of cutting-edge graphics cards, OLED monitors and customisable keyboards, before you can realistically tackle any of that, you need to start with the absolute core of your machine: the processor. Once you have one of the best CPUs in tow, then you can start putting together your gaming PC properly.

Of course, if you’re not exactly sure what it is you need quite yet then fear not, we’re here to help. For anyone starting completely from scratch, a CPU serves as the brain of a device, facilitating the bulk of everything you see on screen. They’re an essential component of any piece of tech as your phone has one, as does your smartwatch, but it’s in PCs and laptops that CPUs really get put to work.

When it actually comes to choosing a CPU, you’ll want to pay attention to the number of cores included (the higher the count the better the CPU can handle multitasking) as well as the clock speed, which relates directly to gaming performance. If you really want to go all out with triple-A games that require a lot of attention to run well, then you’ll also want a CPU with a good cache size.

If you want to know a bit more detail about CPUs in general, including CPU temperature management and what overclocking is all about, then you can find out exactly that in our larger CPU guide. For those who just want to get straight to buying, you’re in the right place as every option here has been tested by one of our experts and verified for their capabilities.

We’ve also made sure to include a good variety of options, so those tied to a budget or only looking to set up a mid-range gaming PC, are still covered. Once you’ve settled on the right CPU for your rig, it’s worth jumping over to our other rankings for the best graphics cards, the best keyboards and the best gaming monitors.

Best CPU at a glance

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_ANCHOR_LIST

How we test

Learn more about how we test CPUs

We always review multiple CPUs at once to compare data, using consistent components for fair testing where possible.

We use a mix of both synthetic and in-game benchmarks to gauge performance, while also considering additional features and pricing.

We also measure the likes of power consumption and peak temperature under stress to get an idea of performance efficiency

  • Impressive gaming performance

  • Versatile across multiple fields

  • APO could be a game changer

  • No price increase compared to last gen

  • Insane temperatures & power draw

  • Far better value CPUs available

  • Little difference compared to last gen

According to our tests, the Intel Core i9-14900K is the most powerful consumer desktop processor you can buy. It excels at both gaming and content creation, making it an excellent all-rounder for any task.

It packs in an astonishing 24 cores, although they are made up of a mix of performance cores and power-efficient cores thanks to Intel’s hybrid design. Nevertheless, this absurd number of cores enables the processor to juggle multiple complex workloads simultaneously, which is especially useful if you’re a professional creator working with animation or 4K video.

Our gaming benchmark tests also saw it consistently beat the competition. It’s admittedly not too much more powerful than the preceding Intel Core i9-13900K since they’re based on the same architecture, but the i9-14900K shares the exact same price point, making it great value for money.

The Intel Core i9-14900K certainly isn’t perfect, as our tests show it to have a high temperature and power draw under stress. But if you’re happy to invest in a top-notch cooler and PSU, then you’ll be treated to the absolute best performance you can get from a consumer CPU.

  • Price to performance value is solid

  • Strong single-core performance

  • 3D V-Cache helps in some titles

  • DDR5 RAM support only

  • AM5 motherboards are still pricey

  • Not quite as potent as Intel offerings

More than anything the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D proves that you don’t need to spend a ton of money to get a great performing CPU for gaming. With a starting price tag of £439/$449 but available regularly for a rate that far undermines that if you do a bit of bargain hunting beforehand, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is perfect for high-end gamers on a budget.

Even though the 7800 technically sits at the entry level portion of the X3D family of CPUs, we were pleasantly surprised to find that it performed at a much better level than expected. In fact, it actually has a fair amount in common with the Ryzen 7 7700X when talking about performance.

When it came to our synthetic tests, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D was able to score 3,656 points in PCMark 10, a solid 14,791 in Geekbench and an impressive 17,938 in Cinebench R23, multi-core mode.

  • Impressive, well-rounded performance

  • Hardware upgrade on Intel Core i7-13700K

  • Very close to i9 performance, but for less cash

  • Exceedingly hot in certain setups

  • Power draw is incredibly high

  • RAM compatibility can be tricky

Unless you’re absolutely made of money, the chances are that your gaming PC also gets used for work and productivity during the day. With that in mind, it helps to have a well-rounded CPU that can handle both types of tasks with ease, which is exactly where the Intel Core i7-14700K comes in.

For starters, the CPU’s hardware is somewhat uncommon compared to what you’d usually find in Intel’s 14th generation chipsets. Inside you’ll find 12 Gracemont efficient-cores, each with a single thread, alongside eight Raptor Cove performance-cores, complete with hyperthreading.

What this leads to is a performance output that is so close to the more expensive Intel Core i9-14900K alternative that it makes the $180 price difference between them seem quite unnecessary unless you want the absolute best. For example, we recorded an impressively high single-core performance in both Cinebench and Geekbench, reaching 2,039 and 2,836 respectively.

The one key downside to bear in mind is that this CPU can run quite hot when pushing it to its very limits, and it managed to reach 100C several times during our stress tests, so you’ll definitely want to pair it with a sufficient CPU cooler.

  • Fantastic multi-core performance

  • Top class gaming speeds

  • Future-proofed with PCIe 5.0 and DDR5

  • Great power efficiency

  • Requires a powerful cooling system

  • Can find better value gaming CPUs elsewhere

  • Worth waiting for Intel Raptor Lake before buying

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is our top recommended processor from AMD. It’s not the fastest option, beaten by the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D, but we believe it represents the best balance of performance and affordability. The Ryzen 7000 Series runs on AMD’s new Zen 4 architecture that not only brings a performance boost, but also support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, enabling you to upgrade to the latest and greatest RAM and SSDs.

AMD claims the Ryzen 9 7900X has a max boost clock speed of 5.6GHz. The only part that seemingly hasn’t been upgraded is the amount of cores and threads from the previous gen – there’s still 12 cores and 24 threads.

Those specs didn’t seem to hold back multi-core performance though. In Cinebench R23, a program which simulates CPU-heavy and intensive tasks such as rendering, AMD’s latest flagship chip managed to beat off Intel’s older generation Alder Lake chip (the i9-12900K) by some margin. The AMD chip has since been taken over by the Intel Core i9-14900K in terms of performance, but the Ryzen 9 7900X consumes considerably less power under stress, making it the more efficient option.

In testing, the Ryzen 9 7900X offered outstanding performance for both gaming and intense creative workloads. If you want even more speed, then AMD also offers the Ryzen 9 7950X which packs more cores, while the Intel Core i9-14900K tops the charts for all of our benchmark tests.

  • Strong overall gaming performance

  • Decent in multi-threaded tasks

  • 3D V-cache is still a game changer

  • Temps and power draw solid

  • Can’t quite keep up in pro workloads

  • Not all games benefit from V-cache

  • No support for DDR4

If you’re loyal to AMD and want the most powerful chip that the company has to offer, then look no further than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D. This takes the excellent performance power of the preceding AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and then boosts it with the clever AMD 3D V-Cache technology that further boosts performance for supported applications and games.

In general, the Intel Core i9-14900K saw a faster performance than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D in our benchmark tests. This was the case for both content creations and gaming workloads, although it fared better for the latter scenario thanks to its excellent single-core performance and 5.7GHz max clock speed.

Select games will also be given a great performance boost by the AMD 3D V-Cache technology, potentially even leapfrogging its Intel rival. But this is very dependent on the game, and there’s no easy way to know which games will benefit beforehand.

Arguably the Ryzen’s biggest trump card is its superb power efficiency, as our tests showed that it drew far less power than the Intel Core i9-14900K. It also impressed in terms of thermal performance, remaining relatively cool under stress. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X arguably offers better value, but if you want the fastest possible AMD chip, this is it.

  • Strong performance in game

  • Best value processor right now

  • Reasonable temps and power draw

  • Price remains the same as last gen

  • No major hardware advancement

  • Better professional picks elsewhere

  • Lacks Intel’s APO tech

The Intel Core i5-14600K offers remarkable value for money, even outperforming more expensive desktop processors such as the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X.

Its single-core performance is especially impressive, with our benchmark results showing it to excel at gaming. This is no one-trick pony either, with its 14 cores and 20 threads ensuring a great performance for multi-threaded workloads such as 3D animation and editing 4K video. It’s still far behind the Intel Core i9-14900K in this regard, but it’s in a league of its own at its price point.

The Intel Core i5-14600K also offers support for DDR5 and PCIe 5.0, which means you’ll be able to team this processor up with the latest and greatest RAM and SSDs to drive up the overall performance ceiling of your PC.

So if you’re looking for a versatile desktop processor that can handle both content creation and gaming at high speeds, but without spending a huge chunk of your savings, then the Intel Core i5-14600K is the current best option.

Test Data

  Intel Core i9-14900K AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Intel Core i7-14700K AMD Ryzen 9 7900X AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Intel Core i5-14600K
PCMark 10 13943 13656 13840 10865 14030 13675
Cinebench R23 multi core 36464 17938 31928 27528 32789 23067
Cinebench R23 single core 2214 1765 2039 1863 1959
Geekbench 5 single core 2180
Geekbench 5 multi core 18613
Geekbench 6 single core 3123 2760 2836 2772 2821
Geekbench 6 multi core 22366 14791 18420 17721 17563
Power consumption 216 W
Peak temperature 98 °C 91 °C 93 °C 95.5 °C 89 °C 93 °C
Borderlands 3 frame rate (4K) 29.7 fps
Borderlands 3 frame rate (Quad HD) 59.63
Borderlands 3 frame rate (Full HD) 81.19
Horizon Zero Dawn frame rate (4K) -1 fps 48 fps
Horizon Zero Dawn frame rate (Quad HD) 77 fps
Horizon Zero Dawn frame rate (Full HD) 216 fps 221 fps 94 fps
Dirt Rally (4K) 65.24 fps
Dirt Rally (Quad HD) 106.45 fps
Dirt Rally (Full HD) 336 fps 157.88 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (4K) -2 fps
Cyberpunk 2077 (Full HD + RT) 220 fps 208 fps 216 fps 211 fps 222 fps
F1 22 (Full HD) 165 fps 148 fps 163 fps 150 fps 162 fps
Total War: Warhammer 3 (Full HD) 195 fps 197 fps 193 fps 196 fps 201 fps
Power consumption (idle) 175.3 W 128.5 W 172.3 W 127.1 W 141.3 W
Power consumption (under stress) 622.1 W 465.3 W 616.5 W 439.5 W 517.6 W
Idle temperature 43 °C 51 °C 39 °C 53 °C 43 °C

Full Specs

  Intel Core i9-14900K Review AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D Review Intel Core i7-14700K Review AMD Ryzen 9 7900X Review AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Review Intel Core i5-14600K Review
UK RRP £580 £400 £579.99 £699 £310
USA RRP $590 $449 $418 $549 $699 $330
EU RRP €669.00
AUD RRP AU$590
Manufacturer Intel AMD Intel AMD AMD Intel
Size (Dimensions) x x INCHES x x INCHES x x INCHES x x MM x x INCHES x x INCHES
ASIN B0CHBJGFBC B0BTZB7F88 B0CGJ41C9W B0BBJ59WJ4 ‎B0BTRH9MNS B0CHBGVFHP
Release Date 2023 2023 2024 2022 2021 2023
First Reviewed Date 21/11/2023 20/02/2024 18/02/2024 21/11/2023 21/11/2023
Model Number BX8071514900K Intel Core i7 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D ‎BX8071514600K
Power Consumption 216 W
Boosted Clock Speed 6 GHz 5.0 GHz 5.6 GHz 5.6 GHz 5.7 GHz 5.3 GHz
Architecture 14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake) Zen 4 Raptor Lake Zen 4 Zen 4 14th Gen Intel Core (Raptor Lake)
Base Clock Speed 3.2 GHz 4.2 GHz 3.4 GHz 4.7 GHz 3.2 GHz 3.5 GHz
Number of Cores 24 8 20 12 16 14
Number of Threads 32 16 28 24 32 20
Motherboard Chipset 600 / 700 Series X670 Z690 / Z790 X570 600 Series 600 / 700 Series
Manufactoring Process 7 nm 5 nm 3 nm 5 nm 5 nm 7 nm
Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 AMD Radeon Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770 AMD Radeon Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 770

Advertisement

How much RAM is enough?

We recommend having at least 8GB of RAM for general tasks, but if you’re looking to play games or edit video etc, then we suggest upping that to 16GB of RAM and beyond.

What is better: GHz or cores?

It really depends on your workload. Having high frequency speeds is obviously very important, especially for intensive tasks such as gaming and content creation. But it’s also important to have multiple cores to improve the efficiency of multi-tasking, especially when using apps such as Adobe Premiere Pro.

Can CPU affect FPS?

Yes, a more powerful CPU can have a positive impact on your FPS when gaming, but a GPU will be more influential here.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


The Windows Insider Program is about to get much easier

Ed Bott / Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Microsoft is making the Insider Program less complicated.
  • Beta channel will be a more reliable preview of the next retail release.
  • Other changes will allow testers to quickly enable/disable new features.

Last month, Microsoft took official notice of its customers’ many complaints about Windows 11. Pavan Davaluri, the executive vice president who runs the Windows and Devices group, promised sweeping changes to Windows 11. Today, the company announced the first of those changes in a post authored by Alec Oot, who’s been the principal group product manager for the Windows Insider Program since January 2024.

Those changes will streamline the Insider program, which has lost sight of its original goals in the past few years. (For a brief history of the program and what had gone wrong, see my post from last November: “The Windows Insider Program is a confusing mess.”)

Also: If Microsoft really wants to fix Windows 11, it should do these four things ASAP

If you’re currently participating in the Windows Insider Program, these are meaningful changes. Here’s what you can expect.

Simplifying the Insider channel lineup

Throughout the Windows 11 era, signing up for the Insider program has required choosing one of four channels using a dialog in Windows Settings. Here’s what those options look like today on one of my test PCs.

insider-program-channels-lineup-old

The current Insider channel lineup is confusing, to say the least.

Screenshot by Ed Bott/ZDNET

Which channel should you choose? As the company admitted in today’s post, “the channel structure became confusing. It was not clear what channel to pick based on what you wanted to get out of the program.”

The new lineup consists of two primary channels: Experimental and Beta. The Release Preview channel will still be available, primarily for the benefit of corporate customers who want early access to production builds a few days before their official release. That option will be available under the Advanced Options section.

windows-insider-channel-lineup-new

This simplified lineup is easier to follow. Beta is the upcoming retail release, Experimental is for the adventurous.

Screenshot courtesy of Microsoft

Here’s Microsoft’s official description of what’s in each channel now, with the company’s emphasis retained:

  • Experimental replaces what were previously the Dev and Canary channels. The name is deliberate: you’re getting early access to features under active development, with the understanding that what you see may change, get delayed, or not ship at all. We’ve heard your feedback that you want to access and contribute to features early in development and this is the channel to do that.
  • Beta is a refresh of the previous Beta Channel and previews what we plan to ship in the coming weeks. The big change: we’re ending gradual feature rollouts in Beta. When we announce a feature in a Beta update and you take that update, you will have that feature. You may occasionally see small differences within a feature as we test variations, but the feature itself will always be on your device.

These changes will apply to the Windows Insider Program for Business as well.

Offering a choice of platforms

For those testers who want to tinker with the bleeding edge of Windows development, a few additional options will be available in the Experimental channel. These advanced options will allow you to choose from a platform that’s aligned to a currently supported retail build. Currently, that’s Windows 11 version 25H2 or 26H1, with the latter being exclusively for new hardware arriving soon with Snapdragon X2 Arm chips.

Also: Microsoft account vs. local account: How to choose

There will also be a Future Platforms option, which represents a preview build that is not aligned to a retail version of Windows. According to today’s announcement, this option is “aimed at users who are looking to be at the forefront of platform development. Insiders looking for the earliest access to features should remain on a version aligned to a retail build.”

windows-insider-advanced-options-new

The Future Platforms option is the equivalent of the current Canary channel

Screenshot courtesy of Microsoft

Minimizing the chaos of Controlled Feature Rollout

Last month, I urged Microsoft to stop using its Controlled Feature Rollout technology, especially for builds in the Beta channel. Apparently, someone in Redmond was listening.

One of the most common questions we receive from Insiders is “why don’t I have access to a feature that’s been announced in a WIP blog?” This is usually due to a technology called Controlled Feature Rollout (CFR), a gradual process of rolling out new features to ensure quality before releasing to wider audiences. These gradual rollouts are an industry standard that help us measure impact before releasing more broadly. But they also make your experience unpredictable and often mean you don’t get the new features that motivated many of you to join the Insider program to begin with.

Moving forward, Insider builds in the Beta channel will no longer suffer from this gradual rollout of features. Meanwhile, the company says, “Insiders in the Experimental channel will have a new ability to enable or disable specific features via the new Feature Flags page on the Windows Insider Program settings page.”

windows-insider-feature-flags

Builds in the Experimental channel will include the option to turn new features on or off.

Screenshot courtesy of Microsoft

Not every feature will be available from this list, but the intent is to add those flags for “visible new features” that are announced as part of a new Insider build.

Making it easier to change channels

The final change announced today is one I didn’t see coming. Historically, leaving the Windows Insider Program or downgrading a channel (from Dev to Beta, for example) has required a full wipe and reinstall. That’s a major hurdle and a big impediment to anyone who doesn’t have the time or technical skills to do that sort of migration.

Also: Why Microsoft is forcing Windows 11 25H2 update on all eligible PCs

Beginning with the new channel lineup, it should be easier to change channels or leave the program without jumping through a bunch of hoops.

To make this a more streamlined and consistent experience, we’re making some behind the scenes changes to enable Insider builds to use an in-place upgrade (IPU) to hop between versions. This will allow in most cases Insiders to move between Experimental, Beta, and Release Preview on the same Windows core version, or leave the program without a clean install. An IPU takes a bit more time than your normal update but migrates your apps, settings, and data in-place.

If you’ve chosen one of the future platforms from the Experimental channel, those options don’t apply. To move back to a supported retail platform, you’ll need to do a clean install.

Also: Apple, Google, and Microsoft join Anthropic’s Project Glasswing to defend world’s most critical software

The upshot of all these changes should make things a lot clearer for anyone trying to figure out what’s coming in the next big feature update. Beta channel updates, for example, should offer a more accurate preview of what’s coming in the next big feature update, so over the next month or two we should get a better picture of what’s coming in the 26H2 release, due in October.

When can we start to see those changes rolling out to the general public? Stay tuned.





Source link