The north metro needs the Blue Line Extension


For more than two decades, the north metro has been told that a modern, reliable transit connection was coming. We have sat through meetings, weighed in on routes, and watched other parts of the region receive the kind of high-capacity transit that sparks development and connects people to opportunity.

The METRO Blue Line Extension (BLE) is our region’s chance to finally finish what we started and to deliver the same level of connection to the north metro that other communities already enjoy.

Some have suggested that bus service alone can meet the needs of our growing corridor. Buses are an essential part of our transportation network. But for the north metro, one of the most diverse and rapidly growing parts of Minnesota, buses alone are not enough. Light rail provides the reliability, permanence and economic pull that cannot be replicated with a bus.

This is not a choice between buses and rail. Light rail strengthens the broader transit network by creating a backbone that enhances bus connections throughout the region. As our communities grow, rail and bus service working together provide the kind of modern transportation system our residents deserve.

When a community invests in light rail, developers respond. They build housing, open storefronts and create jobs because they know the line is not going anywhere. That permanence gives businesses confidence to expand and families confidence to put down roots. The Green Line and its extension have shown this time and again. Our communities have extraordinary potential waiting to be unlocked. But potential only becomes reality when we build the infrastructure that supports it.

The BLE is more than a transit project. It is a generational piece of infrastructure that will shape how our communities grow for decades to come. It will influence where businesses invest, where housing is built, and where opportunity takes root. The project represents a $3.5 billion investment in the future of the north metro and is expected to generate significant economic activity throughout the corridor. Those benefits will be measured in new jobs, new housing, stronger small businesses, and expanded opportunities for future generations.

Younger generations understand what is at stake. They overwhelmingly support transit investments because they see them as investments in their economic, social and environmental future. They want affordable access to jobs, education, healthcare and opportunity throughout the region. They also recognize that a growing metro area needs transportation options that support future development and help protect the environment.

Residents deserve the convenience and predictability that light rail brings. Trains arrive on a schedule you can set your watch to. They are not stuck in traffic. They do not get rerouted. They are not delayed during a snowstorm. For workers, students, seniors, travelers and families, reliability is not a luxury. It is a necessity.

This project is also about fairness. Hennepin County is not just the Mall of America, Minneapolis, and its developing suburbs. The north metro has waited longer for a high-capacity transit connection. While other communities have seen the benefits of light rail, including new housing, new jobs and new investments, our constituents have been told to wait. At some point, a region has to decide whether it believes in fair access to opportunity. Completing the BLE is one way to show that we do.

A recent Minnesota Star Tribune column noted that the Twin Cities region has repeatedly found ways to support major infrastructure investments in other parts of the metro. Yet when the conversation turns to connecting North Minneapolis and the northern suburbs, the value of that investment is questioned. The north metro should not be asked to settle for less opportunity or less investment than other parts of the region.

The Metropolitan Council’s 2050 regional vision calls for a more connected, prosperous and equitable region. Achieving that vision requires investments that support growth and ensure opportunity is shared across the region. We should be planning for 2050, not 1950. As our region grows, we need infrastructure that connects people to opportunity while supporting sustainable economic development.

We also have a responsibility to finish what we started. Taxpayers, businesses and community members have invested years of planning and millions of dollars into this project. Walking away now would waste that investment and signal that the north metro’s future is negotiable. We do not believe it is.

Our message is simple. The north metro deserves the same level of connection as the rest of the region. We have waited long enough. Let us finish what we started and build the future the north metro deserves.

Jeff Lunde is the Hennepin County commissioner representing Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Crystal, New Hope, Osseo and Robbinsdale. Hollies J. Winston is mayor of Brooklyn Park



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews







Today, when one pictures a “classic Dodge Charger”, the first image that pops up is almost certainly one of the highly desirable Charger models from the late 1960s or early ’70s. Indeed, those early muscle car Chargers are iconic, playing a starring role in the “Dukes of Hazzard” television show and, somewhat more recently, “The Fast and the Furious” films. But as time ticks on, is it time to start appreciating the modern version of the Charger as a potential modern classic?

It’s now been over 20 years since Dodge brought back the Charger nameplate for a spacious four-door sedan with an optional HEMI V8 engine. While the basic Charger R/T was a potent machine for its time, Dodge really took the Charger’s game to the next level for the 2006 model year with the debut of the Charger SRT8. 

The SRT8 model used a larger version of the third-gen HEMI V8 that, combined with other performance upgrades, transformed the sedan into a serious performance car capable of running with its 1960s HEMI ancestors at the drag strip — to say nothing of its vastly superior handling and refinement. In the years that followed, Dodge would continue to improve the Charger’s performance with larger and more powerful HEMI engines, but the significance of the original Charger SRT8 is not to be overlooked.

A muscle car legend reborn for the 2000s

Today, with the modern Charger being such an established part of the car enthusiast world, it’s easy to forget some of the controversy that surrounded its mid-2000s return. Most of it focused on the fact that the beloved muscle car nameplate had been brought back for a four-door sedan rather than a retro-styled coupe. Fortunately, those people looking for that retro coupe would be satisfied by the reborn Dodge Challenger when it arrived a few years later, while the Charger went on to become a highly popular muscle sedan in its own right.

The addition of the SRT8 model to the lineup certainly helped, of course. Under the hood was the larger 6.1-liter HEMI V8, which differed from the standard 5.7-liter HEMI in several ways, not least the displacement. With the 6.1 under the hood, the SRT8 made 425 hp and 420 lb-ft of torque, easily laying down a mid-13-second quarter-mile time in Motor Trend’s hands. This was very quick by mid-2000s standards, especially considering the now-outdated five-speed automatic transmission.

But the SRT8’s performance went beyond just the drag strip. As part of the SRT transformation, Dodge also gave the car larger wheels and tires, a retuned suspension setup, and large Brembo brakes. While this didn’t necessarily make the car an agile road course weapon, it did give the SRT8 an athleticism that belied the Charger’s weight and size. 

The evolution of modern Dodge muscle

What’s even cooler about this era in Chrysler/Dodge performance history is that the Charger was just one of the four-door LX platform cars that the automaker offered with SRT badges and a powerful HEMI engine under the hood. Apart from the Charger, buyers could also choose from the more upscale, but ultimately short-lived SRT version of the Chrysler 300C sedan or the Dodge Magnum SRT8 station wagon.

The original Charger SRT8 marked the beginning of a long run of increasingly powerful, high-performance models. In the early 2010s, the Charger SRT8’s 6.1 HEMI was replaced by the larger and more powerful 6.4/392 HEMI, with that motor eventually becoming available in the less expensive Charger R/T Scat Pack. Then, of course, came the Charger SRT Hellcat, with a 707-hp, supercharged 6.2-liter that turned the car into a genuine super sedan.

So is the original Charger SRT8 a guaranteed future classic? Classified listings show that clean examples still bring decent money today, but the fact that it was followed by improved models may ultimately limit its potential for becoming a true, mega-desirable collector car. Regardless, though, the Charger SRT8’s accomplishments in modern muscle car history are not to be taken lightly.





Source link