Young Catholic voters need to recognize what motivates Trump


As a young Christian and a Catholic who values American institutions, few political trends  have alarmed me more than the rise of Christian nationalism.

I also recognize that young  Catholics like me are passionate and active in political advocacy. It is time to recognize what is happening. President Donald Trump’s April attacks against Pope Leo XIV suggest how quickly religious language and loyalty can be deemed inferior to political goals inside the MAGA movement.  

Trump has clashed publicly with Pope Leo over foreign policy and immigration policies. Since becoming pontiff, Pope Leo has repeatedly framed peace as a central Christian duty and warned against the moral costs of war. His public speaking is aligned with the simplest teachings of Christian faith, that peace is to always be the priority among nations. He has also emphasized the dignity and protection of migrants and refugees, continuing a major concern of the modern papacy. 

Many could have seen a direct confrontation between the pope and the president coming,  but not many could have seen its unusually personal and dismissive tone toward church  authority. In a social media post, Trump called Pope Leo “weak on crime” and claimed that  he thinks it is “OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon.” These statements alone were an  extraordinary attack on the leader of the Catholic Church. But, to do one better, he  (perhaps jokingly) posted an AI generated picture of himself as Jesus Christ that many Christians found offensive or outright blasphemous.  

Additionally, this is not the first time he has attacked the Catholic church and its traditions.  During the selection process for pontiff, Trump posted an AI-generated image of himself as  pope, a move widely criticized as disrespectful. Once more, insinuating a significant lack of  respect for Catholic tradition. 

The Catholic church speaks on moral and public issues, but institutionally it does not  endorse political candidates. Hence, the church not been leading the charge on the attack on the secular American republic. 

The Catholic church staying out of the fray creates healthy boundaries in the preservation  of the separation of church and state in our country. But this precedent of nonpartisanship  can be misconceived as having been broken due to the church’s opposition to the Trump  administration’s foreign interventions and immigration policies. This is where Trump has  found the opportunity to undermine the Catholic Church’s influence among Catholics  throughout America; through seemingly depicting MAGA to be the superior guiding identity in their values.

While claiming to be on the side of Christian values, in 2025 the Republicans proposed and championed the “One Big Beautiful Bill.” This bill included slashing Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which impacts millions across America.

This policy is directly contradictory to the  core biblical principle to “Rescue the weak and the needy,” and to “deliver them from the hand of the wicked.” (Psalm 82:4). This verse explains that it is the duty of Christians to  serve the poor and lift them out of their place of struggle. Cuts to SNAP and Medicaid are two key examples of Republican advocacy that have led directly to the weakening of  support for those most in need, in an act counter to fundamental Christian teachings. 

The Republican party invokes Christian identity while backing policies that, in my view,  burden the poor and vulnerable. This pattern of talking about, but not fighting for, the faith, is not new. In a 2015 Bloomberg interview, Trump declined to name his favorite Bible verses because it was too “personal”.  

Young Catholics are active in civic engagement and political activities. We are mobilized,  passionate, but not yet fully unified. Many still support Trump and the Republican Party that follows behind him. However, it is time to realize the main priority within the MAGA coalition: to serve as a movement that often treats religion less as a discipline of  humility than as a language of power.

The attacks on Pope Leo may be an early sign of  something the church has worried about for a long time. When political identity demands religious obedience, it risks eroding the church’s role as a moral conscience. This election season, I call to all young Catholics to carefully consider the motives of the conservative  coalition that claims to be fighting for them. 

Maxwell Fjeld is a community organizer and student at the University of Minnesota.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Regular readers of this blog will know that most of what I do here is explain, analyse, and argue about macroeconomics, monetary policy, and increasingly artificial intelligence. That work is public and free – and I intend to keep it that way.

But over the past year, we have increasingly been asked – through PAICE, the consultancy I co-founded – to bring that kind of thinking directly into organisations. Investment committees, boards, executive teams, and strategy sessions.

So we have formalised that offering under the name Expert Briefings.

What is an Expert Briefing?

It is not a standard presentation. It is a tailored, interactive session where your organisation gets focused access to specialist knowledge on the topics that matter most to you right now. We start from your industry, your risk exposure, and your questions – and work from there.

At PAICE, we cover three interconnected areas:

Macroeconomics, monetary policy, and financial markets – global growth, inflation, central bank policy and communication, interest rates, currencies, commodities, and financial imbalances. The question we always come back to: what does any of this actually mean for your business, your investments, and your risk picture?

Geopolitics and business risk – trade conflicts, energy markets, security policy, and geopolitical shifts. And critically: the concrete implications for companies and investors who have to make decisions in an uncertain world.

Artificial intelligence and technology – the latest developments in AI, what they mean for your specific sector, and how you position yourself strategically when the pace of change is this fast.

These three areas can be addressed individually or in combination, depending on what your organisation needs.

Who is this for?

The organisations we work with range from pension funds and asset managers who need regular macro and market input for investment committees, to CEOs, CFOs, and boards who want an independent external perspective on economics, monetary policy, technology, and geopolitics. Exporters and multinationals dealing with currency risk and trade policy. Banks building internal analytical capacity. Technology companies navigating AI regulation and competitive dynamics.

The common thread is that they want direct access to expertise – not a consultant’s slide deck, but a genuine conversation with someone who has spent decades thinking about these questions.

Formats

We try to be flexible about how this works in practice. Some organisations want a regular monthly or quarterly cadence to stay continuously updated. Others prefer an on-demand retainer – a standing arrangement that allows them to call on a briefing when the need arises, without going through a full procurement process each time. And sometimes the need is simply a one-off session for a strategy day or board meeting.

For topics that genuinely benefit from multiple perspectives, we can also convene an expert panel – two or more specialists combining, for instance, macroeconomics with AI and technology, or geopolitics with energy markets.

Who delivers the briefings?

The briefings are anchored by me. I spent fifteen years as Head of Emerging Markets Research at Danske Bank, including co-authoring the 2006 “Geyser Crisis” report that identified the risks building in the Icelandic banking system ahead of the 2008 collapse. Today I serve as co-founder, co-owner, and Head of Analysis at PAICE, where our work sits at the intersection of macroeconomic analysis, monetary policy, AI, and data.

For broader panels and cross-disciplinary sessions, I draw on PAICE’s network of specialists across macroeconomics, monetary policy, financial markets, artificial intelligence, technology, and geopolitics.

Getting in touch

If any of this sounds relevant for your organisation, we are happy to have an initial conversation about what might make sense.

Contact: hello@paice.io

Speaker platform: http://www.globaletanker.dk (in Danish)





Source link