Maple Grove Daily

Maple Grove Daily

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.






Many motorcyclists are passionate about their rides, and that’s especially true of Harley-Davidson owners. That appreciation goes beyond the brand’s iconic logo and company legacy, as the longevity of the bikes and their engines is often a huge selling point. When it comes to the Milwaukee-8 engine, it’s common to find owners praising its reliability online — albeit with some notable exceptions.

Harley owners mostly appreciate the engine, with the reliability seemingly a strong point. A Harley owner on the UKGSer claimed to have put over 16K miles on two different Milwaukee-8-powered bikes without issue, while a Harley-Davidson Forum poster asserts that they had put 224,000 trouble-free miles on their 2020 bike over five years. Reddit users also loved the M8, with many agreeing it’s a great engine that often outperforms other engines.

However, some owners have had problems with the 114 variation of the Milwaukee-8. Much of those problems are related to oil collecting at the bottom of the engine’s crankcase, a condition known as “sumping.” There are many tales of this occurring online, though evidence suggests that the issue is limited to older models.

The evolution of the Milwaukee-8 engine

Harley-Davidson first acknowledged the Milwaukee-Eight’s sumping issue in a 2017 factory service bulletin. The bulletin noted that the issue primarily occured during extended periods of high-rpm operation or under heavy engine load. These situations would lead to an excessive amount of oil gathering in the engine’s crankcase, affecting the flywheel movement and causing the bike to lose power. High levels of engine braking were also possible, as was engine damage. Affected models included the Touring, CVO, Trike, Police, and Softail.

But while this was one of the reasons riders may have stayed away from even used Harleys, the company appears to have addressed the issue. The 2017 bulletin includes technical updates, indicating that the issue may have been fixed by implementing revised oil pump designs. These new pumps had updated part numbers and were installed to replace older pumps in affected motorcycles.

Despite any early problems, Harley-Davidson continues to use the M8 family of big-twin engines in the Touring and Softail models. The lineup’s variants currently include 107, 114, 117, and 121 cubic-inch models, with the 121-CI version powering certain CVO models like the Road Glide ST. These versions emphasize improved airflow, combustion efficiency, and better output compared to earlier large-displacement Harley engines like the Twin Cam engines.





Source link






Fuel economy and fuel efficiency get used interchangeably all the time, but they’re not actually the same thing. One is a specific measurement, and the other’s more of a broader concept. Knowing which is which can make all the difference, both for a vehicle’s performance and estimating its fuel costs. It’s all about looking beyond the traditional mpg figure to see the big picture.

In the simplest of terms, fuel economy is miles per gallon (MPG). It gives you an estimate of how far a vehicle can travel using one gallon of fuel. On paper, a sedan rated at 30 mpg can travel 30 miles on a gallon of gasoline. But fuel efficiency will tell you how effectively that sedan actually converts that fuel into motion. If it’s too big, too heavy, or driving too fast, fuel economy can take a hit. For that reason, a vehicle can have an efficient engine, but poor fuel economy.

A different way to measure fuel consumption

This nuance between fuel economy and fuel efficiency is why some are pushing to measure fuel consumption by gallons used over a fixed distance rather than miles traveled per gallon. The argument is that gallons per 100 miles gives drivers a more accurate description of how much fuel a vehicle burns, not unlike the calculation to find MPGe.

Automotive researcher Edmunds says it best. In its example, an SUV with a fuel economy of 12.5 mpg uses eight gallons to travel 100 miles, but a sedan with a fuel economy of 25 mpg uses four gallons over the same distance. Likewise, a 50-mpg hybrid would need two gallons. By thinking of it this way, Edmunds explains, you can see both fuel economy and fuel efficiency in one metric… revealing “how much gas is saved in each case.” 

Sticking with Edmunds’ exercise, think about a 25-mpg sedan and a 50-mpg hybrid. Fuel economy would make you think the hybrid is more efficient than the sedan because the mpg figure doubles. But in reality, the difference is only two gallons saved per 100 miles. Meanwhile, a 25-mpg sedan saves four gallons over a 12.5-mpg SUV using eight. That’s better fuel efficiency.

Here’s what to take away from all this math: Fuel economy measures distance traveled per gallon, while fuel efficiency tells you how effectively a vehicle uses fuel overall. To get the best picture, think in terms of fuel consumption rather than fuel economy alone.





Source link

Recent Reviews