What Does The Leaf Symbol Mean On Brake Pads?






Copper has the chemical symbol “Cu” (from the Latin word “cuprum”) and has been used by humans for a very long time. Neolithic people used this naturally occurring metal as far back as 8,000 BCE, after they realized it was better than banging stone tools together. Copper is found in the human body and is indispensable in keeping it running smoothly. In fact, we need about 900 micrograms per day. It’s been used for countless incredible inventions over the millennia, including our cars’ braking systems.

Asbestos was used in early brake pads but was eventually replaced by asbestos-free alternatives and, later, by copper, due to its superior heat dissipation and friction stability, both of which improved braking and extended lifespan. The friction generated during use produces temperatures between 250°F and 390°F. Copper is a great thermal conductor that helps resist that intense heat. Unfortunately, every time they’re used, copper particles fall haphazardly onto road surfaces. 

Copper released into the environment spreads far and wide, and doesn’t break down. After heavy rain, those particles wash into municipal drainage systems and flow out to creeks, streams, and oceans, where they become detrimental to aquatic life. In 1991, the EPA published the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) to minimize the levels of these elements in drinking water. In January 2015, an agreement was made between the EPA, individual states, and the auto industry to reduce the use of copper in brake pads.

The Copper-Free Brake Initiative of 2015

In 2015, there were approximately 263 million registered vehicles in the United States. Today, we’re at or near 300 million. That’s a lot of brakes. Much in the same way asbestos was eventually found to be hazardous to our health, so too was copper. The January 2015 Copper-Free Brake Initiative called for reducing copper in brake pads to less than 5% by weight by 2021, with a further reduction to 0.5% by 2025. Copper wasn’t the only element that was reduced; the accord also agreed to lower the amount of mercury, lead, cadmium, asbestiform fibers, and chromium-6 salts. Manufacturers used a three-leaf symbol on boxes to indicate that brake pads complied with the initiative.

In 2010, before the copper reduction mandates were put in place, it’s estimated that as much as 1.3 million pounds of copper dust entered California’s environment. Some estimates say that California has had a 61% reduction in copper runoff since the changes were made. Meanwhile, Washington had as much as 250,000 pounds of copper particle pollutants, much of which ended up in its waterways and was especially harmful to salmon. Washington was the first state to ban copper brake pads due to the fish’s economic importance as a primary export. 

Today, modern brake pads come in four flavors. Organic (also known as Non-Asbestos Organic) pads are made from fiberglass, rubber, and sometimes Kevlar. There is also ceramic, which produces the least amount of dust. Metallic and semi-metallic brake pads contain a mix of iron, copper, steel, and other metals.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link