Apple iPhone Buried for 250 Years Probably Won’t Work, Report Says


An Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max that’s been buried as part of an America250 time capsule is unlikely to work when it’s time to unearth it. America’s Time Capsule, due to be dug up in 2276, includes an iPhone with a Notes app featuring “digital artifacts” for future readers. 

The America250 constitution with signatures in front of Supreme Court building

The pocket constitution is included inside America’s Time Capsule. 

America250

However, a Forbes report suggests that the iPhone will be unusable for future generations. The battery is a “fundamental failure point” because lithium-ion batteries degrade over time. The report also suggests that Apple’s “restrictive practices,” such as dropping support for older models, would prevent the phone from being unlocked at all, even if it survives. 

That’s assuming humans will even be using wall outlets, chargers and the same kinds of energy supply and voltage in 250 years — and that Apple servers will still be active.

America Innovates is an event co-hosted by Forbes and America250. It’s unclear whether including Apple’s device was intended as a commentary on the company’s “planned obsolescence” business strategy, where products are designed with a limited lifespan.

Representatives for America Innovates did not respond immediately to CNET’s request for clarification.

This was state-of-the-art technology…

Burying technology in a time capsule may be functionally useless for preservation, but still valuable as a cultural mirror. Sure, the hardware will fail long before two centuries pass, but it serves a historical purpose rather than a practical one.

Still, it’s probably useful to include a disclaimer that we honestly believed we were living in the ultimate digital age when the capsule went underground. That state-of-the-art technology will probably be glorified, nonbiodegradable plastic trash in 250 years. 

The 900-pound time capsule is also filled with photos, documents and other items from the three branches of the government, as well as from all 50 states and territories. These items include a stainless steel rosary from Puerto Rico and a Pocket Constitution signed by Supreme Court Justices.

Experts warn that time capsules are an ineffective way to preserve information for several reasons, including the presence of groundwater. A 2019 article said that 99% of unearthed capsules are destroyed or, perhaps worse, simply boring.

“Burying something is literally the worst way to preserve it for future generations,” Paleofuture blogger Matt Novak told Mental Floss, “but we continue to do it.” 

The iPhone is also not the first Apple product to be buried underground for later digging up. In 2013, a once-lost “Steve Jobs time capsule” buried 30 years before was discovered with an Apple mouse inside. Also included was a six-pack of Balantine beer and a Rubik’s Cube.

screenshot-2026-07-06-at-4-26-00pm.png

For 30 years, the location of the “Steve Jobs Time Capsule” was lost to history, until it was uncovered in 2013, containing the Apple founder’s Lisa mouse.

Screenshot by CNET





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






To paraphrase a famous superhero, flying is, statistically speaking, the safest way to travel. It is, of course, also one of the more expensive modes of transportation available to travelers. And yes, if you’ve rolled a suitcase into an airport any time in the past couple of decades, you know travelers are required to adhere to dozens of rules and regulations before they board a plane, and even more while they’re up in the air.

Most of those rules are put in place by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the government agencies tasked with overseeing and regulating transportation and civil aviation in the United States, respectively. Apart from the myriad rules drawn up by those factions, many major airlines have added to the list with regulations that their passengers must adhere to in-flight, and yes, you agree to those terms anytime you buy a ticket by way of a “contract of carriage.”

United Airlines just added a pretty major new rule to its CoC that requires all passengers to use headphones when enjoying content with audio from a personal device like a laptop, tablet, or mobile phone. The rule is intended to limit environmental noise in the plane’s cabin, thereby ensuring a more pleasurable flight for both passengers and crew. Still, you may be surprised just how far United is threatening to go in punishing those who refuse to adhere.  

United may take its headphones policy to extreme measures in some cases

If you’ve ever been seated near someone who isn’t using headphones (which is one of the necessary in-flight gadgets) while watching a movie, listening to music, or even scrolling through social media in flight, you no doubt agree that United’s new headphones rule is one that’s very much worth enforcing. In fact, many other airlines already have similar policies in their own contracts of carriage. Even still, none of those policies are quite as severe as United’s, with the airline’s new CoC amendment stating that failure to adhere to the headphones rule could ultimately result in your removal from the flight.

That CoC goes on to state that not only might you be removed from the flight you’re on if you refuse to use headphones, but you may also be permanently banned from flying with United Airlines. As travel expert Scott Keyes told CBS, United is the first major airline to take such a hardline stance on the matter of headphones, but it wouldn’t be surprising to see its competitors quickly adopt similar policies.

Interestingly enough, it is not made entirely clear just how far United is prepared to go in enforcing the rule. For instance, it would be relatively easy to remove a passenger from the plane prior to takeoff. It’s much harder to imagine that United would go so far as to land a plane mid-flight to the same end. But perhaps that is where the threat of a permanent ban comes into play. Only time will tell.





Source link