These Toyota Truck Engines Have Bad Reputations Buyers Should Know About







Everyone is probably familiar with the adage of Toyota cars being amongst the most reliable vehicles on the planet. In fact, we’d argue that the brand has built its entire reputation on being boring — via route of being reliable, sensible, and usually gray — because the car never stops working. So, when a Toyota engine has a “send it back to the factory” level problem, it becomes the talk of the town. And, as you’ll see, Toyota’s rare misses are talked about decades later, especially when it concerns a truck. 

We’ve all seen the memes about Toyota trucks winding up everywhere from wars in deserts to suburban driveways where the largest obstacle is the curb. That said, by and large, a Toyota truck (like the vast majority of other Toyota vehicles) is known for starting every morning, having lower-than-optimal infotainment systems, price gouging you on trim levels, and really never leaving you stranded on the side of the interstate. However, even the best of us aren’t infallible, and so it is with Toyota. 

While we will get into numbers later in this article, here’s something to give you an idea of the scale of the problem: Just one engine family has been responsible for almost 275,000 vehicles being recalled — and that’s just in the past two years between 2024 and 2026. There are a total of five engines on this list, and we’ll be progressing in a chronological order, from oldest to newest.

Toyota’s current truck lineup explained

The current Toyota truck lineup consists of surprisingly few models. You have the workhorse Hilux (notoriously unavailable in the U.S.), the midsize Tacoma, and the full-size Toyota Tundra. There is also the LC79 pickup, which is essentially the legendary 70 series given a pickup body and a modern VIN number, like a blast from the past. Sadly, of the four trucks that Toyota currently has in production, only the Tacoma and the Tundra continue to be available in the U.S. market. The LC79 struggled with the American Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) as well as EPA emissions guidelines, while the Hilux would remain uncompetitive on price because of the “chicken tax” — a duty imposed on light-duty imported pickups instituted in the 1960s. 

The current duo of Toyota trucks on offer in the U.S., then, is all we have, and engine choices are equally restrictive. The Tacoma gets three distinct engine choices, all of which are a 2.4-liter inline-4 motors, making up to 326 hp and 465 lb-ft of torque. The most powerful engine on the Tacoma (with the 326 hp) is a hybrid setup, while the base engine makes 278 hp and 317 lb-ft of torque. The modern Toyota Tundra is similar — which we’ll cover later on – and it’s extremely, overwhelmingly, and uncharacteristically problematic.

3VZ-E 3.0L V6

The first engine on our list is over four decades old, having debuted in 1988. This family was actually the first mass-produced V6 engine that Toyota would ever make. This engine is so old that, at the time, Toyota didn’t even have a name for its pickup truck in North America, branding it the “Toyota truck” or “Toyota pickup” until 1995, when the Tacoma nameplate first appeared. The 3VZ-E displaced three liters across six cylinders, with a bore of 87.5 mm and a stroke of 82 mm, and could be found in the second iteration of the 4Runner, as well as in the fifth-gen Toyota pickup. 

However, there were bound to be some teething problems on this generation, and the most fatal flaw stemmed from the way the exhaust system was set up. The exhaust crossover pipe (which is a system that connects the left and right side exhaust manifolds on V-shaped engines) used to run right behind a couple of the cylinder heads. This exhaust crossover would then proceed to bake that rear cylinder with excessive amounts of heat (from the exhaust gas it carried), which would lead to head gasket failure, wrecking the engine if unchecked. Furthermore, the from-factory exhaust crossover pipe was prone to heating up so much (and then not being cooled properly) that the valves in the exhaust system would literally burn themselves. The cooling system was also prone to trapping air bubbles in the system.

3VZ-E 3.0L V6 (Continued)

In Toyota’s defense, it did issue a service campaign – specifically SSC V06 for those interested – wherein gaskets on all affected vehicles made after 1990 would be replaced, and gaskets on 1988 to 1990 models would get an extended warranty up to 100,000 miles. If you are looking to nab a Toyota truck from this generation, you should really make sure that the service campaign was carried out, otherwise it’s just a very expensive repair waiting to happen. 

However, proof of repair for a 30-something year old truck would be hard to find, so it’s probably best to avoid trucks with this engine. If you have your heart set on one of these trucks though, there are a couple fixes that one could do to alleviate the issues to a great degree — but they’re not cheap. For one, you could get performance headers installed on the engine that would be better at wicking the heat away from the head, or you could also get an aftermarket exhaust crossover kit. As a temporary fix, you could thermally insulate the factory crossover exhaust system on the passenger side — but be careful that the insulation is properly certified so as to not catch on fire. 

If you can find a truck where any of the above “upgrades” have been done, then that’s great; otherwise you’ll need to budget a few thousand dollars for at least one of the fixes, which could actually well exceed the cost of the truck.

3RZ-FE 2.7L I4

Released in 1994, the 3RZ-FE is a four-cylinder unit arranged in an inline layout that displaces a total of 2.7 liters via a bore of 95 mm and an equivalent stroke — making about 150 hp and 177 lb-ft of torque. Additionally, the engine was notably a dual overhead cam (DOHC) unit that also featured fuel injection, technologies that were just gaining traction at the time. 

This engine had big shoes to fill, given that it was the replacement for the tried, tested and true Toyota 22R-E, which was also a truck-focused four-cylinder workhorse engine. The 3RZ-FE could be found in all the models that the 3VZ-E 3.0L V6 from above was in, i.e., the 4Runner and Tacoma. In addition to those models, the 3RZ-FE I4 could also be had in the uniquely-named Land Cruiser Prado, Hilux truck, and the HiAce van. 

While the unit didn’t suffer from a debilitating single flaw like the V6 that we just looked at, it did have a slew of common issues. The timing chain on the engine would be prone to stretching (usually because the tensioners or guides in the chain system begin to give) which could result in catastrophic damage to engine internals. Other issues were with the serpentine belt eating itself, the balancer shafts acting up, and the water pump failing.

5VZ-FE 3.4 V6

Next, we need to make a very clear distinction between “this is an unreliable hunk of metal that turns oil into mileage” and “this engine is not necessarily unreliable, but isn’t without criticism.” The 5VZ fits the latter. For those who are paying attention to the naming, you’ll notice that this engine is remarkably similar to the 3.0-liter V6 that we covered at the beginning of this article. That’s because the 5VZ-FE is a direct successor to that engine, introduced in 1995 for many of Toyota’s mainstay models, like the 4Runner, Tacoma, Tundra, T100, Hilux, and Land Cruiser Prado. 

It did solve many of the quibbles that came with the incumbent V6, but new technologies did bring about some unforeseen issues on the new engine. The most prominent problem on this model would be the knock sensor harnesses in the bay failing, because both sensors were located at the bottom of the engine valley where various things could spoil them. This could even put the engine into limp mode, along with throwing up check engine lights and worsening the economy. To fix this (ostensibly common) issue would need a few hours of labor, all for a part that can be found for about $70, including shipping. Other issues on this legendary Toyota 3.4 V6 were the exhaust manifolds cracking, which could trigger an exhaust leak -– characterized by that tick-ticka-tick-ticka sound during a cold start. The timing belt, rough idling, and serpentine belt are also points of failure.

3UR-FE 5.7L V8

The 3UR-FE was the most powerful V8 motor available in a Toyota when it launched in 2007. It was to be found in models such as the Toyota Tundra and Sequoia as well as some Land Cruiser variants, so it was a massive engine built to power Toyota’s largest body-on frame trucks. The specific Land Cruiser it powered was the LC200 in only some markets, along with the Lexus LX570, the luxury version of the Land Cruiser; the only truck it came in would have been the Tundra, made between 2007 and 2021. 

This is because 2022 model Tundra pickups shipped with the brand new V35A-FTS engine that we’ll cover in the next section, which was even more problematic than this one, the 3UR-FE. Once again, the 3UR-FE was not debilitatingly unreliable -– far from it -– but it did come with a number of known, common issues. Primarily, early models of the Tundra suffered from a defective camshaft (a supplier’s fault) that could lead to camshaft cracks and failure. 

Also, moisture can enter the air injection pumps and switching valves, causing a host of issues. Other problems that happen with some regularity on the 5.7 V8 include exhaust manifold cracks, water pump leaks, and difficulties replacing the starter motor due to where it’s buried. Furthermore, aside from North America and some African markets, the 5.7 V8 was generally eschewed for the diesel or the 4.6 V8 instead; getting cheap imported parts would be tough if your local scrapyard doesn’t have one laying about.

V35A-FTS 3.4L Twin-Turbo V6

The latest problem child from Toyota is actually fairly new, as the issues began as recently as the middle of 2024. The engine in question is a V6 motor that displaces 3.4 liters, assisted by two turbochargers, carrying the engine code of V35A-FTS. 

As we alluded to in the introduction, the V35A-FTS engine is found in the modern Toyota Tundra, where it can be had either as a hybrid powerplant or as a purely internal-combustion (ICE) unit. The non-hybrid makes 358 hp and 406 lb-ft of torque, while the electrified system, with its additional e-motor, makes an impressive 437 hp at 5,200 RPM, along with 583 lb-ft of torque at 2,400 RPM. 

In 2022, this engine was offered in the Toyota Tundra for the first time, though the engine had been around for five years prior, debuting on the Lexus LS500. As Lexus is the luxury arm of Toyota, there is a fair bit of platform, engine, and component-sharing between the two brands. After the engine debuted on the Tundra, problems started almost immediately.

V35A-FTS 3.4L Twin-Turbo V6 (Continued)

Over a quarter-million units of the V35A-FTS were at risk of shipping with a major manufacturing defect. Engine blocks undergo machining which produces microscopic metal shavings – called “swarf” in the industry. Now, typically, the engine block is cleaned quite thoroughly, but in certain V35As, this wasn’t done. As a result, metal shavings could find their way into the crankshaft and the main bearing. For those who don’t know, the crankshaft is basically the thing that turns the up-down-up-down movement of the pistons into forward momentum sent to the wheels. The main bearing can be thought of as the “housing” that the crankshaft sits in, and it’s important to note that the crank and bearing aren’t supposed to touch. 

There is a layer of oil that prevents that, but these metal shavings could get into that (very thin) layer of oil and cause friction. This would fuse the crankshaft and main bearing together, wrecking your engine. Toyota initially issued a recall for 102,000 units in May, 2024, expanded it once in November, 2025, and then once more in May, 2026, bringing the total number of affected vehicles up to more than 270,000 in total. On the initial recall, every single engine block would be replaced, but as the issue scale became clear, the “expansions” toned things down. On the 2025 and 2026 recalls, dealers would check the software for wear and replace the block if necessary — a risky move, considering how widespread the issue was.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


Google Drive Organize My Files

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Gemini can suggest Drive file moves and new folders.
  • Organize My Files requires Workspace or Google AI access.
  • The tool is useful but still feels limited and unfinished.

I’m an Apple person. I’ve owned an iPhone since 2007 and a Mac since before that, so of course I’m also a longtime user of iCloud Photos and iCloud Drive. I pay $10 a month for the 2TB iCloud+ plan because I have 488GB of data sitting there, including nearly 40,000 photos. Don’t judge me. The real problem is that I’m also a heavy Google user, specifically Workspace apps.

Also: I tested ChatGPT Plus vs. Gemini Pro to see which is better

After 14 years of using Google Drive, I have 340GB of data stored there from all the Google Docs, Sheets, Slides, and Gmail messages I’ve created, not to mention file uploads. So I pay $20 a month for Google AI Pro, which gives me 5TB of storage and access to Gemini AI. And because, apparently, I need all the subscriptions, I also pay $20 a month for ChatGPT Plus.

I need to cut subscriptions

I know… I need to cut subscription costs somewhere. I’ve wondered whether I should cancel ChatGPT or somehow, some way, reduce my Google usage enough to stop paying for extra Drive storage. Realistically, I do not think I could ever get my data down to the 15GB Google gives me for free. My Drive has become so daunting that I’ve mostly stopped trying to manage it.

The funny part is that I am hyper-organized. My pantry has coordinated glass jars with labels. My daughter’s toy room has a place for everything. My Google Drive, though? A dumping ground. What can I say? Pre-parenthood Elyse was not so organized.

Also: Tired of AI Overviews? I found 9 Google Search alternatives

Because my Drive has never been in a good place, I have let files, photos, screenshots, PDFs, tax documents, drafts, downloads, and random digital debris accumulate with no real oversight for years. I keep putting off cleaning it.

Recently, I had the idea that some AI service could connect to my Drive and help me quickly organize it with a few clicks. Then I remembered my Drive includes things like my house deed, a copy of my will, and my LLC business details, and suddenly giving a random third-party company broad access to my personal data felt like too much to bear.

So here we are. My Drive is still messy, and my subscriptions are still multiplying. Joy. I sure do love that in this economy.

Can ‘Organize My Files’ declutter my Drive?

But today I spotted a quiet little launch from Google: its “Organize My Files” feature is now available. Can Gemini actually, truly help me declutter, organize, and simplify my Drive now? Apparently, it uses Gemini AI to suggest moving loose files in Drive into existing folders or creating new folders for related files. And I get to review everything before anything moves.

Also: I tried Gmail’s new Gemini AI features, and I want to unsubscribe

If this works, maybe one day I can move my data out of Drive and cancel my Google AI Pro plan for good. Maybe. One day.

How Organize My Files works

What you’ll need: A Google account with a messy-as-hell Drive. Oh, and Google’s “Organize My Files” feature is currently limited to Google Workspace and Google AI subscribers. Workspace smart features must also be enabled for it to appear in Drive.

Open Google Drive

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

Look toward the top of the file and folder list in My Drive for a new button called “Suggest File Moves.” Google said it will appear in My Drive as well as in parent folders in Drive. 

Clicking Suggest File Moves opens a new Organize My Files window, where Gemini will begin analyzing loose files and suggesting ways to clean them up.

Also: This Gemini setting made my AI results way more personal


Show more

Click Suggest File Moves

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

After a minute or so, Gemini serves up recommendations to review. They’re divided into two main types:

  • Gemini may suggest moving files into existing folders in Drive.
  • Gemini may suggest creating new folders for related groups of files.

All files and folders can be previewed through hovercards or opened in a new tab for a closer look.

Also: Is Google’s AI Ultra plan worth $100/month?


Show more

Review Gemini's suggestions

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

It’s time to use the checkboxes to select or deselect any file or folder that Gemini served up. 

Also, if a suggested folder name is weird, just rename it. Check destinations for folders, too. If they aren’t right, change the target. Once the suggestions do look right and you’re happy, approve the changes.

Gemini will then perform the file or folder moves in one batch and return to My Drive.

Also: I used Nano Banana 2 to make perfect sketchnotes: 5 lessons


Show more

Approve the changes

Elyse Betters Picaro / ZDNET

My result

After all that, Gemini suggested 19 moves for me. Nineteen. And it mostly surfaced recent files I had created or uploaded.

Some of the suggestions made sense. Gemini wanted to move my resume and a couple of resumes I had helped family members create into an existing resume folder. It also suggested creating a new Family and Real Estate folder for house deed documents, plus a Travel Planning folder for upcoming summer trip itineraries I have stored in Drive. But one of the files it grouped under Travel Planning was literally called “Delete,” because it’s a doc I want to delete. Gemini did not realize that, nor did it suggest deleting it.

To be clear, I have hundreds of gigabytes of data and years of clutter sitting in Google Drive.

Also: How I unlocked another 15GB of Gmail storage for free

Still, I approved the changes Gemini recommended. For the heck of it, I ran the tool again. In about 30 seconds, it suggested the same thing: the same file moves, the same new folders, and the same changes it had just made. This feels half-baked.

It’s not at all the sweeping cleanup assistant for Drive that I was hoping for and need. Maybe it will get better over time. It did just come out of beta, and it’s possible Google will improve how Gemini scans Drive, prioritizes older files, recognizes obvious trash, and surfaces deeper organization suggestions. I just don’t want to have to click it 500 times, hoping it finds something new each time.

Looks like I’m still stuck with a messy Drive and a $20 AI Pro subscription… for now.





Source link