The Reason Why Amazon’s Fire TV Stick Is So Much Cheaper Than The Apple TV







We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.

If you have ever shopped for an Amazon Fire TV Stick or an Apple TV, you likely noticed a rather substantial price difference between the two. Apple TVs start at $199, while Amazon Fire TV Sticks usually go for about $59.99, depending on the model, and for even less with discount sales. That’s a pretty big gap, and while some of it can be attributed to Apple’s strong track record of delivering premium-quality devices, that’s only part of the reason. 

Namely, the Fire TV Stick is likely designed to be a so-called “loss leader,” which is a tactic businesses use to sell something at low cost (or even at a loss) to draw in customers and encourage them to buy other, more expensive products. Way back in 2012, Jeff Bezos admitted that the company sells hardware at cost. He stated that Amazon wants to earn money when customers use its devices, rather than through pure sales.

As a somewhat expected result of said tactic, the company collects your data to then serve you ads. Advertising is a huge business for Amazon. If you have ever used an Amazon service, you’ve likely noticed a large number of ads. Connected TV advertising is generally on the rise, with some estimates that in 2025, the connected TV advertising market reached $33.35 billion in the United States alone. Now, add the more than 250 million Fire TV devices sold globally, and the math speaks for itself.

Amazon wants you to be part of its ecosystem

The company doesn’t really hide the fact that it uses your data for advertising purposes, among other things. Besides doing some objectively useful things better than a smart TV, Fire TV Sticks can collect data about the applications you use, movies and TV shows you watch, voice requests through Alexa, search history, your location, and more. All of this is used to measure advertising and serve you targeted ads. Amazon also says that it sometimes includes third-party advertising as well, providing your data to advertisers to serve more useful and relevant ads.

Basically, the company wants you to be a part of its advertising ecosystem. For instance, while using your Fire TV Stick, Amazon can (and will) show you ads encouraging you to subscribe to Amazon Prime (which also has its own ads), rent a movie, shop, or do anything else related to the company’s services. This means that the online retailer doesn’t have to make a profit from device sales and can afford the low price if it earns revenue from active use and advertising. This is largely different from Apple TV, where the main focus is on hardware and performance, hence the premium price.

In July 2024, the Wall Street Journal reported that Amazon sold its Echo speakers and other smart gadgets at low prices, hoping to make up the profit through other parts of the business. Hence, it’s not that far-fetched (one would say it’s logical) to assume that this is also the strategy with Fire TV Sticks, and a reason why the Fire TV Stick is cheaper than the Apple TV. Plus, to be fair, compared to other major smart TV devices, Apple TV just does some things better.





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews


1,000W, 10-port charger for $45... predictably disappointing.

1,000W, 10-port charger for $45… predictably disappointing. 

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


ZDNET’s key takeaways

  • Things that look “too good to be true” invariable are just that.
  • This example got dangerously hot in a short period of time before dying. 
  • There’s no legitimate charger that comes close to delivering on the 1,000W promise.

Being a tech reviewer for a living means that I get offered some very interesting things. Not interesting as in Bugatti supercars or jewel-encrusted Fabergé eggs, but interesting as in “this thing could easily be a fire hazard — want to take a look?”

Also: The best GaN chargers of 2026: Expert tested

Submissively, I often say yes. And I’m glad I did with the most recent pitch, because it was very interesting indeed.

Meet the “interesting” charger

This time around, the thing of interest was a charger that claimed to deliver an incredible 1,000W through its ten ports — four 140W USB-C ports, four 100W USB-C ports, and two 20W USB-A ports. 

The person who bought this charger told me that they’d plugged it in, used it to charge their phone for “a few minutes,” got worried when it became “a little hot,” and unplugged it.

That's a lot of promise... but (spoilers), they don't deliver!

That’s a lot of promise… but (spoilers), they don’t deliver!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

The unit was suspiciously light and plasticky, especially given its built-in power supply. Compare this to Ugreen’s Nexode 500W charger, which weighs a hair under 5 lb.

There was also a slight whiff of melty plastic, which made me think that this had been a bit more than a little hot. 

Also: This $4 router reboot timer is the cheap internet fix I didn’t know I needed – and it works reliably

Color me suspicious, but I had a gut feeling that the only way this charger would be able to push out 1,000W would be if it caught fire. 

Turns out I wasn’t far wrong.

How long would it last? Answer: Minutes

Talk is cheap. It was time to test the charger. 

So I plugged it in, turned it on, and started using it. Within a couple of minutes of starting to use it, I noticed a few things:

  • No matter what I tried, I couldn’t persuade the charger to deliver more than about 60W from any of the ports. 
  • As for peak output, I managed to get close to 250W.
  • The power output was very uneven and noisy, fluctuating wildly. The more ports I used, the worse it got.
  • The unit got very hot to the touch very quickly, even under light loads. 
  • But… before I could get the thermal camera out to check how hot it got, there was a pop and the unmistakable smell of “Magic Smoke.” The charger had been sent to Silicon Heaven within minutes.

Annnnd… POP! This is the moment the charger gave up the ghost.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Diagnosis time

Time to take it apart and have a look inside. For an item that plugged into the mains power, this unit was shockingly easy to take apart. 

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

A thin sheet of easily removable plastic is a that separates curious hands from live AC power.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

And even unplugged and broken, it was capable of delivering zaps! If the case came off while this was plugged into an outlet, it could very easily be deadly.

There’s charge still in some of the capacitors, and these could deliver quite a zap despite the unit being broken and unplugged!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

After getting inside, the unit was filled with a grey goo that I’d seen in a previous disappointing charger I’d taken apart. This is a thermal paste that’s used to try to dissipate the heat generated by the components. 

It’s not really going to work because it’s sealed in a plastic box with no effective heatsink. It’s a token gesture at best. At worst, it creates a mass that’ll slowly heat up and hold temperature because it’s got no way to get rid of it.

Behold the grey goo!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Next to this goo was a bank of capacitors — the black cylinders in the photo — which were the cause of the failure. They’d clearly overheated, with three of them showing signs of bulging.

The problem!

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes/ZDNET

Well there’s the problem!

I also noticed that two of the components — bridge rectifiers that are used to turn AC mains into DC — have been fixed on an angle to make the touch a metal heatsink. It’s not really an effective way to cool down components.

The bottom line

Another “too good to be true” device bites the dust. It’s not the first one I’ve come across, and it won’t be the last.

Moral of the story here is that manufactures are using big number marketing — in this case 1,000W and masses of ports — to scalewash poor quality products. 

This might be a half-decent product if it was built to deliver 100W, but there’s no end of competition at that end of the market. Silkscreen “1,000W” on the outside, sprinkle in a few reviews that feel scripted and fake, and all of a sudden it’s interesting and exciting… right up until it blows up. 

Also: My top 7 laptop-bag essentials now, after decades of remote work

I know of no 1,000W charger. In fact, the 500W Ugreen Nexode is the highest-power charger that I’ve tested that’s legit. And the price is also legit — $250. 

But it’s built to deliver on what it promises and is packed with safety features, including “tip-over protection,” which cuts the output when the unit tips over and prevents it from falling on its side, where it can’t dissipate heat effectively. Now that’s an attention to safety that I like to see in a product that handles that much power. 

But if you want 1,000W of output, you’ll have to buy two and duct tape them together.





Source link