I brought a Bose, Sony, and JBL speaker to the beach – this one’s my new outdoor essential


Bose SoundLink Plus in Citrus Yellow

Jada Jones/ZDNET

Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.


As a Georgian, it’s customary to travel down to Florida to get some sun on the beach during summer vacation. I figured this year, I’d take a few of the latest Bluetooth speakers with me to better gauge their performance.

Also: I flew 2,700 miles with Apple, Sony, and Sennheiser headphones – this pair had the best audio

As with the many headphones I test, it’s easy to form a positive opinion of a speaker in controlled environments such as my home office, front porch, or parents’ backyard. But throw that same speaker into some uneven loose sand, uncontrollable ocean waves, and a nearby naval base and you have some totally different conditions. 

I took the Bose SoundLink Plus, JBL Charge 6, and Sonos Play, outside with me while I relaxed on the shores of Pensacola Beach, using a different speaker each day. Here’s how it went.

Day 1: JBL Charge 6

JBL Charge 6 in Purple

Jada Jones/ZDNET

The good: portability, Auracast

The Charge 6 lies horizontally, and its carrying strap clips one end to the other. Thus, you get a comfortable handle that makes it easy to carry the three-pound speaker. Since JBL supplied the Charge 6 with Auracast, if you have a compatible smartphone, you can play music from one phone to several Auracast-enabled speakers, regardless of manufacturer. 

Review: JBL Charge 6

JBL’s implementation of Auracast is a huge plus, considering Bose doesn’t support the feature, instead forcing you to purchase another one (keyword, one) of its speakers for Party Mode, while Sonos supports grouping with up to four speakers, but limits this feature to the Move 2 and Play speakers.

The bad: battery

The JBL Charge 6 has the longest advertised battery life out of this trio, promising 24 hours of playtime plus an additional four hours with the Playtime Boost battery-saving feature enabled. Though 28 hours is impressive, Playtime Boost significantly dampens the speaker’s bass response, which is no good when noisy waves, children, and military jets are in the equation.

In a noisy environment, like a public beach in the middle of June, the Charge 6 won’t offer 24 hours of playtime, let alone 28. To combat environmental noise, I increased the speaker’s volume, which consumes more power and shortens your playtime – very common for portable speakers as a whole, not just JBL.

Also: 48 hours later with the Google Home Speaker, I can’t stop talking to Gemini (even if it’s imperfect)

I used about 45% of the battery over six hours, so I probably could have squeezed out nearly seven more. I didn’t need to use the Charge 6’s reverse USB-C charging to charge my phone, but if I did, it would also drain the speaker’s battery quicker.

Day 2: Bose SoundLink Plus

Bose SoundLink Plus in Citrus Yellow

Jada Jones/ZDNET

The good: style, bass, battery

Bose’s SoundLink Plus is a very stylish portable speaker. Its design is sleeker and more minimalist than JBL’s Charge 6, and it comes in more fun colors than Sonos’s Play. Anytime I’ve taken the SoundLink Plus out and about with other people, I always get compliments on its look. If you want a portable speaker that looks as good as it sounds, Bose has you covered.

Review: Bose SoundLink Plus

The SoundLink Plus’s strong bass is its greatest asset, as increasing the volume and tweaking the highs and mids in the Bose app brought vocals forward, while maintaining its strong bass response. I used the SoundLink Plus for nearly six hours, played it loudly, and had just under 70% battery left, which is on par with Bose’s advertised 20 hours. 

The bad: also the bass

Bose fitted the SoundLink Plus with a tweeter, a midwoofer, and four passive radiators. With this speaker configuration, the passive radiators work overtime to deliver a beefed-up bass response. However, with waves constantly crashing and the occasional fighter jet flying over me, at a lower volume, all I could hear was bass, as it cuts through the noise the most. 

Day 3: Sonos Play

Sonos Play

Jada Jones/ZDNET

The good: sound, voice assistant, auto EQ

The Sonos Play is a great-sounding speaker, fitted with three Class-H amplifiers that power two tweeters and one midwoofer for the brand’s signature smooth, fun sound. The Sonos Play features Automatic Trueplay, which uses the speaker’s built-in microphone to optimize its sound for your environment. This feature did help with balancing the Play’s sound, and it is available over Bluetooth. 

Review: Sonos Play

Sonos Voice Control also works over Bluetooth, though limited to basic controls, such as track play, pause, skip, and volume up/down. Still, I found this feature useful when I finally washed my hands of sand and didn’t want to touch the sandy speaker before eating.

The bad: design, battery

However, unlike the SoundLink Plus and Charge 6, the Play speaker sports a vertical orientation. It was difficult to keep the Play upright on the uneven sand, and laying it horizontally does alter the sound profile.

Also: Your Sonos smart speaker has an underutilized automation feature – 5 helpful ways I use mine

After a five-hour day, I used about half of the speaker’s battery, which means the Play could have offered me nearly 14 hours instead of its advertised 24. Again, it’s not uncommon for Bluetooth speakers’ playtime to run a little short when you’re using them outdoors and turning up the volume, which is directly related to their power consumption.

Writer’s choice

It’s tough to choose between the Bose SoundLink Plus and the JBL Charge 6 for outdoor adventures. Objectively, the SoundLink Plus better handled increased power demands, while the Charge 6 has a stronger durability rating and supports Auracast; both speakers support reverse USB-C charging.

Subjectively, I appreciated the SoundLink Plus’s stylish design and powerful bass response. For summer days outside, I’ll reach for it first.

Though the Sonos Play is a great speaker and offers many of the same features as Bose’s and JBL’s speakers, it loses much of its coveted features, such as voice assistant support and Wi-Fi streaming, as soon as you leave your home network. It’s much better suited for outdoor listening within your property line.

What about waterproofing?

The Bose SoundLink Plus and Sonos Play have an IP67 durability rating, while the JBL Charge 6 has an IP68 rating. All three speakers are waterproof and can withstand submersion in water up to three feet deep for up to 30 minutes, but the JBL charge can withstand submersion in water up to three-and-a-half feet for up to 30 minutes, making it the most durable of the bunch.

With their waterproof ratings, all three speakers can withstand splashes, droplets, jets, and brief, shallow submersion without significant damage. 

Also: I switched to a Bose-Sonos hybrid setup for my home audio – and it worked harmoniously

All three speakers are fully protected from solid objects, which translates to protection against sand, dust, dirt, or gravel in the real world. Based on these speakers’ durability ratings, all three responded well to sand exposure and were perfectly fine after a quick rinse with freshwater to remove any residual sand.

Ingress protection (IP) ratings, or durability ratings, are a focal point of Bluetooth speaker specs. These ratings determine how well a specific speaker withstands exposure to water and dust before these particles degrade its performance. The first number signifies solid particle resistance, while the second number indicates liquid resistance.

Manufacturers certify these speakers in controlled labs by blasting them with fine talcum powder and water from different directions at various pressures. 





Source link

Leave a Reply

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get our latest articles delivered straight to your inbox. No spam, we promise.

Recent Reviews






A 100-year-old World War II veteran was recently reunited with the tank he drove during the Battle of Iwo Jima. The tank was an M4 Sherman, and the veteran was Marine Corporal Leighton Willhite. The M4 Sherman was America’s most common tank during that war, with about 50,000 produced before the war’s end. It dominated the battlefield long after WWII.

The detective work behind the reunion of the soldier and the tank was performed by Jonathan Bernstein, Arms and Armor Curator at the National Museum of the Marine Corps. Bernstein did extensive research at the National Archives into the unique aspects of the tanks of the 5th Tank Battalion that served on Iwo Jima. It turns out that this specific tank, named “Lucky,” had countermeasures designed to minimize the effects of Japanese magnetic anti-tank mines. This included nails welded point-up onto its upper surfaces to prevent the mines from being placed flush against its upper body, where they would cause major armor damage. While the nails were gone, the weld scarring remained from where they’d been attached. Photographs shot during the battle confirmed that “Lucky” was present there on March 1, 1945. According to Bernstein, it is very rare to be able to put a specific crew together with the tank they operated, but it definitely happened here.

Corporal Willhite, who was 18 at the time, also demonstrated immense bravery when he and his commander left the tank to rescue another tank crew who became trapped. Willhite received the Bronze Star with Valor.

What role did Sherman tanks play in the Battle of Iwo Jima?

The M4 Sherman tanks, as exemplified by “Lucky,” played a key role in the Battle of Iwo Jima, where their biggest strengths and weaknesses were displayed. The volcanic sand terrain was difficult for the tanks to negotiate, causing many transmission failures for the Shermans. It’s also where three U.S. Marine divisions went up against a heavily fortified Japanese force that had no qualms about sacrificing itself to slow the Marines’ advance. 

A favorite Japanese tactic was to attack the Marines’ tanks with satchel charges strapped to their backs, detonating their charges after sliding underneath the tanks, where the armor was not as strong. Magnetic mines that stuck to the tanks’ bodies were also used by the Japanese. This led to a variety of “adaptations” made to the Sherman tanks. 

These included the welded-on nails, plus wooden planks along the sides of the tanks that protected the tanks’ suspensions and reduced the effects of shaped charges. In addition, there were other adaptations, including spraying sand onto freshly painted areas of the tank to prevent Japanese magnetic mines from adhering to it. Sections of the tanks’ tread, known as track blocks, were also spot-welded onto vulnerable parts of the tanks, such as the front and the turret, where they offered additional protection and could be accessed if spare parts were needed. According to a report from the 5th Tank Battalion on the subject of Iwo Jima, “The all-around performance of the M4A3 tank was exceptionally good.” During the five-week battle that ended in victory, 7,000 Marines died, and 20,000 were injured.

What happened to Lucky between Iwo Jima and its recovery at Camp Lejeune in 2002?

Following the victory at the Battle of Iwo Jima, “Lucky” went back to Hawaii, where it was refitted for its next planned role, showing how tanks shaped the course of WWII. Along with 71 other tanks, “Lucky” was converted into a flame-thrower tank, which replaced around 60% of its ammunition storage capacity with tanks capable of holding 300 gallons of napalm. The event that these 72 tanks were being prepared for was the invasion of Japan, which ended up not happening, thanks to the atomic bombs “Little Boy” and “Fat Man” being dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan, in August of 1945. This, combined with the concurrent Soviet invasion of Manchuria, led to Japan’s formal surrender in September of that year. 

Later, “Lucky” was used as a training tank for an indeterminate period, after which it was sent to Camp Lejeune, the Marine base in North Carolina. It was left in a wooded area of the base until it was discovered by some Marines in 2002, who sent it to the National Museum of the Marine Corps. And the rest is history.

The story of “Lucky” and Corporal Willhite is just one small piece of the vast World War II panorama of events that stretched across the entire world by the time it ended. It exemplifies how millions of American and other Allied soldiers were engaged in bloody battles across many different locations, fighting for a cause they truly believed in. There’s a reason that this cohort is known as “The Greatest Generation.”





Source link